Abstract
Scientists who speculate on the future of human longevity have a broad range of views ranging from the promise of immortality, to radical life extension, to declines in life expectancy. Among those who contend that radical life extension is already here, or on the horizon, or immortality is forthcoming, elements of their reasoning appear surprisingly close, if not identical, to a famous mathematical paradox posed by the ancient Greek mathematician known as Zeno. Here we examine the underlying assumptions behind the views that much longer life expectancies are forthcoming or have already arrived, and place their line of reasoning within the context of a new Zeno paradox described here as The Paradox of Immortality.
References
1.
Lang HS: The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
2.
Wilmoth JW: In search of limits; in Wachter K, Finch C (eds): Between Zeus and the Salmon. Washington, National Research Council, 1997, pp 38–64.
3.
Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS; Mortality measurement at advanced ages: a study of the Social Security Administration Death Master File. North Am Actuar J 2011;15:432–447.
4.
Wilmoth J: How long can we live? Science, 2001. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/291/5508/1491.summary/reply#sci_el_32.
5.
Olshansky SJ, Carnes BA, Butler R: If humans were built to last. Sci Am 2001;284:50–55.
6.
De Grey ADNJ: Foreseeable and more distant rejuvenation therapies; in Rattan SIS (ed): Ageing Interventions and Therapies. Singapore, World Scientific, 2005, pp 379–395.
7.
De Grey ADNJ: Escape velocity: why the prospect of extreme human life extension matters now. PLoS Biol 2004;2:e187.
8.
Human Mortality Database: http://www.mortality.org/.
9.
De Grey A: Forseeable and more distant rejuvenation therapies; in Rattan S (ed): Aging Interventions and Therapies. Singapore, World Scientific, 2005, pp 379–395.
10.
De Grey A: The natural biogerontology portfolio: ‘defeating aging’ as a multi-state ultra-grand challenge. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007;1100:409–423.
11.
Carnes BA, Olshansky SJ, Hayflick L: Can human biology allow most of us to become centenarians? J Gerontol Biol Sci 2012 (in press).
12.
Carnes BA, Staats DO, Vaughan M, Witten T: An organismal view of cellular senescence. Méd Longév 2010;2:141–150.
13.
Kurzweil R, Grossman T: Fantastic Voyage. Plume, New York, 2005.
14.
Beltrán-Sánchez H, Preston SH, Canudas-Romo V: An integrated approach to cause-of-death analysis: cause-deleted life tables and decompositions of life expectancy. Demogr Res 2008;19:1323–1350.
15.
Vaupel J, Gowan AE: Passage to Methuselah: some demographic consequences of continued progress against mortality. Am J Public Health 1986;76:430–433.
16.
Vaupel JW: The remarkable improvements in survival at older ages. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1997;352:1799–1804.
17.
Vaupel JW: Biodemography of human ageing. Nature 2010;464:536–542.
18.
Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW: Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 2009;374:1196–2008.
19.
Carnes BA, Staats DO, Sonntag WE: Does senescence give rise to disease? Mech Ageing Dev 2008;129:693–699.
20.
Bell FC, Miller ML: Life tables for the United States Social Security Area 1900–2100: Actuarial Study No. 120. US Social Security Administration. https://www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/NOTES/as120/LOT.html (accessed January 12, 2012).
21.
Olshansky SJ, Carnes BA, Cassel C: In search of Methuselah: estimating the upper limits to human longevity. Science 1990;250:634–640.
22.
Girosi F, King G: Demographic Forecasting. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2008.
23.
Wilmoth JR: Demography of longevity: past, present, and future trends. Exp Gerontol 2000;35:1111–1129.
24.
Warner H, Anderson J, Austad S, et al: Science fact and the SENS agenda. EMBO Rep 2005;6:1106–1108.
26.
Reither EN, Olshansky SJ, Yang Y: Forecasting the future of health and longevity. Health Affairs 2011;30:1562–1568.
27.
Carnes BA: What is lifespan regulation and why does it exist? Biogerontology 2011;12:367–374.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.