Ties to parents or grown children may be the most important social relationships in an adult’s life. Research examining intergenerational relationships has focused on three broader topics: (a) the strength of emotional bonds, (b) exchanges of social support, and (c) the effects of the relationship on individual well-being. This review considers some of the major theoretical developments in the field including solidarity and intergenerational ambivalence theory as well as the newly developed multidimensional model of support. We also consider weaknesses in the research and theories to date and provide suggestions for future research.

Keywords:
Intergenerational exchanges, Family solidarity, Late life family, Intergenerational relationships, Intergenerational ambivalence
1.
Fingerman KL, Cheng YP, Tighe L, Birditt KS, Zarit S: Relationships between young adults and their parents; in Booth A, Brown SL, Landale N, Manning W, McHale SM (eds): Early Adulthood in a Family Context. Berlin, Springer, 2012, pp 59–85.
2.
Bengtson VL: Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. J Marriage Family 2001;63:1–16.
3.
Lowenstein A: Solidarity – conflict and ambivalence: testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members. J Gerontol B Soc Sci 2007;62:S100–S107.
4.
Birditt KS, Fingerman KL: Parent/child and intergenerational relationships across adulthood; in Fine MA, Fincham FD (eds): Family Theories: A Content-Based Approach. New York, Routledge Academic, in press.
5.
Fingerman KL, Birditt KS: Adult children and aging parents; in Schaie KW, Willis SL (eds): Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2011, pp 219–232.
6.
Giarrusso R, Feng D, Bengtson VL: The intergenerational stake over 20 years; in Silverstein M (ed): Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Berlin, Springer, 2005, pp 55–76.
7.
Birditt KS, Zarit S, Fingerman KL: Intergenerational relationship quality across three generations. J Gerontol B Soc Sci 2012, E-pub ahead of print.
8.
Rossi AS, Rossi PH: Of Human Bonding: Parent-Child Relations across the Life Course. Amsterdam, Aldine de Gruyter, 1990.
9.
Fingerman KL: Aging Mothers and Their Adult Daughters: A Study in Mixed Emotions. Berlin, Springer, 2001.
10.
Fingerman KL, Pitzer LM, Chan W, Birditt KS, Franks MM, Zarit S: Who gets what and why: help middle-aged adults provide to parents and grown children. J Gerontol B Soc Sci 2011;66B:87–98.
11.
Fingerman KL, Cheng YP, Wesselman ED, Zarit S, Furstenberg FF, Birditt KS: Helicopter parents and landing pad kids: intense parental support in adulthood. J Marriage Family, in press.
12.
Luescher K, Pillemer K: Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later-life. J Marriage Family 1998;60:413–425.
13.
Fingerman KL, Pitzer LM, Lefkowitz ES, Birditt, KS, Mroczek D: Ambivalent relationship qualities between adults and their parents: implications for both parties’ well-being. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci 2008;63B:P362–P371.
14.
Uchino BN, Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TW, Bloor L: Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. J Soc Clin Psychol 2004;23:123–139.
15.
Birditt KS, Fingerman KL, Zarit S: Adult children’s problems and successes: Implications for intergenerational ambivalence. J Gerontol B Soc Sci 2010;65:145–153.
16.
Fingerman KL, Chen PC, Hay EL, Cichy, KE, Lefkowitz, ES: Ambivalent reactions in the parent and offspring relationship. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci 2006;61B:152–160.
17.
Pillemer K, Suitor JJ, Mock S, Sabir M, Sechrist J: Capturing the complexity of intergenerational relations: exploring ambivalence within later-life families. J Soc Issues 2007;63:775–791.
18.
Suitor JJ, Gilligan M, Pillemer K: Conceptualizing and measuring ambivalence in later life. J Gerontol B Soc Sci 2011;66:769–781.
19.
Fingerman KL, Pillemer KA, Silverstein M, Suitor JJ: The Baby Boomers’ intergenerational relationships. Gerontologist 2012;52:199–209.
20.
Fingerman KL: ‘We had a nice little chat’: age and generational differences in mothers’ and daughters’ descriptions of enjoyable visits. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci 2000;55:95–106.
21.
Troll LE: Grandparents: the family watchdogs; in Brubaker T (ed): Family Relationships in Later Life. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1983.
22.
Son J, Erno A, Shea DG, Femia EE, Zarit SH, Stephens MA: The caregiver stress process and health outcomes. J Aging Health 2007;19:871–887.
23.
Grundy E, Henretta JC: Between elderly parents and adult children: a new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich’ generation. Aging Soc 2006;26:707–722.
24.
Fingerman KL, Miller LM, Birditt KS, Zarit S: Giving to the good and the needy: Parental support of grown children. J Marriage Family 2009;71:1220–1233.
25.
Silverstein M, Gans D, Yang FM: Intergenerational support to aging parents: The role of norms and needs. J Family Issues 2006;27:1068–1084.
26.
Dykstra PA, Kalmijn M, Knijn TCM, Komter AE, Liefbroer AC, Mulder CH: Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships, Wave 1 (NKPS Working Paper No 4). The Hague, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, 2005.
27.
Suitor JJ, Sechrist J, Plikuhn M, Pardo S, Pillemer K: Within-family differences in parent-child relations across the life course. Curr Directions Psychol Sci 2008;17:334–338.
28.
Swartz TT: Intergenerational family relations in adulthood: Patterns, variations, and implications in the contemporary United States. Annu Rev Sociol 2009;25:191–212.
29.
Lee J, Zarit S, Rovine MJ, Birditt KS, Fingerman KL: Middle aged couples’ exchanges of support with aging parents: patterns and association with marital satisfaction. Gerontology 2012;58:88–96.
30.
Attias-Donfut C, Wolff FC: The redistributive effects of generational transfers; in Arbur S, Attias-Donfut C (eds): The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies. London, Routledge, 2000, pp 22–46.
31.
Levitzki N: Parenting of adult children in an Israeli sample: parents are always parents. J Fam Psychol 2009;23:226–235.
32.
Umberson D, Pudrovska T, Reczek C: Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: a life course perspective. J Marriage Family 2010;72:612–629.
33.
Knoester C: Implications of childhood externalizing problems for young adults. J Marriage Family 2003;65:1073–1080.
34.
Pitzer LM, Fingerman KL: Psychosocial resources and associations between childhood physical abuse and adult well-being. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci 2010;65B:425–433.
35.
Belsky J, Jaffee S, Hsieh KH., Silva PA: Child-rearing antecedents of intergenerational relations in young adulthood: a prospective study. Dev Psychol 2001;37:801–808.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.