Background: Deficits in strength, power and balance represent important intrinsic risk factors for falls in seniors. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between variables of lower extremity muscle strength/power and balance, assessed under various task conditions. Methods: Twenty-four healthy and physically active older adults (mean age: 70 ± 5 years) were tested for their isometric strength (i.e. maximal isometric force of the leg extensors) and muscle power (i.e. countermovement jump height and power) as well as for their steady-state (i.e. unperturbed standing, 10-meter walk), proactive (i.e. Timed Up & Go test, Functional Reach Test) and reactive (i.e. perturbed standing) balance. Balance tests were conducted under single (i.e. standing or walking alone) and dual task conditions (i.e. standing or walking plus cognitive and motor interference task). Results: Significant positive correlations were found between measures of isometric strength and muscle power of the lower extremities (r values ranged between 0.608 and 0.720, p < 0.01). Hardly any significant associations were found between variables of strength, power and balance (i.e. no significant association in 20 out of 21 cases). Additionally, no significant correlations were found between measures of steady-state, proactive and reactive balance or balance tests performed under single and dual task conditions (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: The predominately nonsignificant correlations between different types of balance imply that balance performance is task specific in healthy and physically active seniors. Further, strength, power and balance as well as balance under single and dual task conditions seem to be independent of each other and may have to be tested and trained complementarily.

Keywords:
Steady-state balance, Proactive/reactive balance, Force production, Single/dual tasking, Cognitive/motor interference
1.
Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK: A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol 1994;49:M72–M84.
2.
Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR: The epidemiology of falls and syncope. Clin Geriatr Med 2002;18:141–158.
3.
Pijnappels M, van der Burg PJ, Reeves ND, van Dieen JH: Identification of elderly fallers by muscle strength measures. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008;102:585–592.
4.
Hausdorff JM, Edelberg HK, Mitchell SL, Goldberger AL, Wei JY: Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:278–283.
5.
Luukinen H, Koski K, Hiltunen L, Kivela SL: Incidence rate of falls in an aged population in northern Finland. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:843–850.
6.
Rubenstein LZ: Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 2006;35(suppl 2):ii37–ii41.
7.
Spink MJ, Fotoohabadi MR, Wee E, Hill KD, Lord SR, Menz HB: Foot and ankle strength, range of motion, posture, and deformity are associated with balance and functional ability in older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:68–75.
8.
Shimada H, Tiedemann A, Lord SR, Suzukawa M, Makizako H, Kobayashi K, Suzuki T: Physical factors underlying the association between lower walking performance and falls in older people: a structural equation model. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;53:131–134.
9.
Carter ND, Khan KM, Mallinson A, Janssen PA, Heinonen A, Petit MA, McKay HA: Knee extension strength is a significant determinant of static and dynamic balance as well as quality of life in older community-dwelling women with osteoporosis. Gerontology 2002;48:360–368.
10.
Granacher U, Bridenbaugh SA, Muehlbauer T, Wehrle A, Kressig RW: Age-related effects on postural control under multi-task conditions. Gerontology 2011;57:247–255.
11.
Granacher U, Gruber M, Gollhofer A: Force production capacity and functional reflex activity in young and elderly men. Aging Clin Exp Res 2010;22:374–382.
12.
Holviala JH, Sallinen JM, Kraemer WJ, Alen MJ, Hakkinen KK: Effects of strength training on muscle strength characteristics, functional capabilities, and balance in middle-aged and older women. J Strength Cond Res 2006;20:336–344.
13.
Izquierdo M, Aguado X, Gonzalez R, Lopez JL, Hakkinen K: Maximal and explosive force production capacity and balance performance in men of different ages. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999;79:260–267.
14.
Mayson DJ, Kiely DK, LaRose SI, Bean JF: Leg strength or velocity of movement: which is more influential on the balance of mobility limited elders? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:969–976.
15.
Melzer I, Benjuya N, Kaplanski J, Alexander N: Association between ankle muscle strength and limit of stability in older adults. Age Ageing 2009;38:119–123.
16.
Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR: Foot and ankle characteristics associated with impaired balance and functional ability in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005;60:1546–1552.
17.
Shimada H, Obuchi S, Kamide N, Shiba Y, Okamoto M, Kakurai S: Relationship with dynamic balance function during standing and walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:511–516.
18.
Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A: Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002;16:1–14.
19.
Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y: ‘Stops walking when talking’ as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 1997;349:617.
20.
Kapteyn TS, Bles W, Njiokiktjien CJ, Kodde L, Massen CH, Mol JM: Standardization in platform stabilometry being a part of posturography. Agressologie 1983;24:321–326.
21.
Muller O, Gunther M, Krauss I, Horstmann T: Physical characterization of the therapeutic device Posturomed as a measuring device – presentation of a procedure to characterize balancing ability. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2004;49:56–60.
22.
Montero-Odasso M, Schapira M, Varela C, Pitteri C, Soriano ER, Kaplan R, Camera LA, Mayorga LM: Gait velocity in senior people. An easy test for detecting mobility impairment in community elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 2004;8:340–343.
23.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed ‘Up & Go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–148.
24.
Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S: Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 1990;45:M192–197.
25.
Granacher U, Gruber M, Gollhofer A: Resistance training and neuromuscular performance in seniors. Int J Sports Med 2009;30:652–657.
26.
Newton RA: Validity of the multi-directional reach test: a practical measure for limits of stability in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M248–252.
27.
Beauchet O, Dubost V, Herrmann FR, Kressig RW: Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005;2:26.
28.
Laessoe U, Hoeck HC, Simonsen O, Voigt M: Residual attentional capacity amongst young and elderly during dual and triple task walking. Hum Mov Sci 2008;27:496–512.
29.
Beauchet O, Dubost V, Aminian K, Gonthier R, Kressig RW: Dual-task-related gait changes in the elderly: does the type of cognitive task matter? J Mot Behav 2005;37:259–264.
30.
Cohen J: A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992;112:155–159.
31.
Henwood TR, Riek S, Taaffe DR: Strength versus muscle power-specific resistance training in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63:83–91.
32.
Kressig RW, Beauchet O: Guidelines for clinical applications of spatio-temporal gait analysis in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18:174–176.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.