Background: Both diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) are age-related diseases and therefore occur simultaneously. DM and, in particular, diabetic nephropathy are associated with an increased modification of the extracellular tissue matrix with advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). Objective: As AGE-modified matrix impairs the invasive migration of lung carcinoma cells, our study aimed at the effect of DM on the NSCLC-related outcome. Methods: In a retrospective clinical study, we analyzed the time-dependent survival of NSCLC patients with DM compared to patients without DM, who had been treated for cancer by resection surgery. The age-matched study population (51–80 years) included 55 DM patients and 111 non-DM patients. Results: Comparative analyses between DM and non-DM patients did not find significant differences for NSCLC histology, tumor stage and stay in the hospital. Analyses of the mid-term (20-month) survival showed that the DM group had a significantly higher proportion of NSCLC patients being alive 20 months after tumor resection than the non-DM group (76 vs. 59%, p = 0.048). The DM-related increase in the mid-term survival rate was particularly observed for patients without lymph node metastasis (88%) and those patients also suffering from nephropathy (90%). In contrast to the mid-term survival, DM had no effect on the long-term (60-month) survival of NSCLC patients (35 vs. 32% in the non-DM group). Conclusion: Our study indicates that DM-associated changes mediate beneficial effects in terms of NSCLC progression, in which AGE modifications might play a critical role.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.