Background: Muscle power assessed by isokinetic dynamometers has the potential for playing an important role in investigating functional status in older subjects. Researchers and clinicians are interested in the reliability of isokinetic test protocols for the confidential assessment of status, as this affects the interpretation of the results of an intervention program. Objective: The current study investigated the inter- and intrarater reliability of an isokinetic strength-testing protocol of the knee and ankle preceded by a familiarization session. Methods: Twenty-four independently living elderly subjects (6 males, 18 females, mean age 71.2 ± 5.5 years) were assessed 3 times in two test sessions. The main outcomes were the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurements (SEM) and ratio of limits of agreement (RLOA) for isokinetic knee and ankle contractions, as measured with the Biodex System 3. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients of the isokinetic variables varied from 0.81 to 0.99 representing ‘good’ to ‘very good’ reliability. Most SEM and RLOA indexes represented acceptable agreement which varied from 6 to 13 and 18 to 37%, respectively. Nonacceptable agreement was found for ankle plantar flexion with SEMs that varied from 14 to 17% and RLOAs from 39 to 48%. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that the Biodex System 3 is a reliable device when used for elderly living independently. The ability of the device to determine a real change in isokinetic ankle and knee contractions is better on a group level than on an individual level. The Biodex System 3 can be employed with confidence in studies to determine the effect of exercise intervention programs on physical activity.

Keywords:
Isokinetic test protocols, Isokinetic dynamometers, Protocol reproducibility, Knee/ankle contractions
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.