Background: A large number of studies have demonstrated that various kinds of DNA damage accumulate during aging and that oxidative stress possibly contributes to this process. Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) can prevent their possible effects on DNA via detoxification of reactive substances that induced oxidative stress. Objective: To investigate the relationship between GSTM1 polymorphism and DNA sensitivity to oxidative stress with age, we used micronucleus (MN) frequency as a marker of DNA damage in lymphocytes from young and elderly subjects. Methods: This study was performed in 30 young (age range 20–36 years) and 30 elderly (age range 66–87 years) healthy individuals who were chosen on the basis of their GSTM1 genotype (15 GSTM1 null and 15 GSTM1 positive for each group). Lymphocytes were cultured after Ficoll isolation and treated for 48 h with a 30-µM dose of cumene hydroperoxide (CumOOH), a dose that does not decrease cell viability. Results: There was no significant difference in the MN frequency observed in control cultures from young and elderly individuals. However, the MN frequency in CumOOH-treated cultures was significantly higher in the elderly group than the young group (p < 0.001). No association was found between the GSTM1 phenotype and CumOOH-induced MN frequency. Conclusions: The results suggest that lymphocytes of elderly individuals are more susceptible to in vitro MN induction by CumOOH. However, this difference in susceptibility is not explained by the lack of GSTM1.

Keywords:
Aging, Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay, Glutathione S-transferase M1, Human lymphocytes, Oxidative stress
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.