Background: The growth of life-sustaining medical technology and greater attention to medical care at the end of life have provoked interest in issues related to advance care planning. Objective: To investigate how having a living will (LW), resuscitation preferences, health condition, and life attitudes are related in home-dwelling elderly people. Methods: In a cross-sectional descriptive study, detailed assessments were made of 378 home-dwelling elderly individuals participating in a cardiovascular prevention study (DEBATE Study). The participants were inquired about a preexistence of a written document (LW) concerning life-sustaining care, preferences of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in their current situation, and attitudes towards life. General health, physical and cognitive functioning, the presence of depression, and quality of life were also assessed. Results: Forty-four of the 378 participants (12%) had a LW. As compared with those without one (n = 334), there were more women [82% (36/44) vs. 63% (210/334)] and widows [57% (25/44) vs. 41% (135/334)] among those with a LW. They were also more educated and considered their health to be better. Despite having a LW, 46% (20/44) of them preferred CPR in their current condition, a proportion not statistically different from the 58% (194/334) of the individuals without a LW. In the whole sample, 39% (149/378) of the individuals preferred to forgo CPR. As compared with those preferring CPR, they were older, more often women, and widowed. Participants preferring to forgo CPR had a poorer quality of life, were more lonely, and showed signs of depression more often than those preferring CPR. The preference to forgo CPR was related to attitudes towards life regardless of physical or cognitive functioning. Conclusions: Having a LW does not reduce the reported preference of CPR which is related more to current mental status and life attitudes. In-depth assessment of the patient’s preferences should be performed in any comprehensive care plan.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.