Background: Experimental data on nociception in the elderly have so far been contradictory and most of these have been obtained using psychophysical methods with little attention paid simultaneously to the state of cognition and the psychometric performance of the subjects. Objective: The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to evaluate the impact of age on experimental nociception thresholds, and (2) to investigate the interactions of age, sex, cognition and psychometric performance with nociception thresholds. Methodology: (1) Two groups, one young and one elderly, of 42 healthy participants each, 21 males and 21 females, were compared as regards nociception thresholds with thermal and mechanical stimuli (heat and pressure detection and tolerance thresholds). (2) The elderly group took cognitive (mini-mental test), psychometric (choice reaction time) and psychophysical tests in auditory (sensibility, tolerance, discrimination) and nociceptive fields. Results: This study shows that (1) pressure nociception decreases with age especially in males, while thermal thresholds are not modified, and (2) correlations exist between cognitive function, psychometric performance, tolerance to loud sounds and tolerance to mechanical noxious stimuli. Conclusion: Our results suggest that cognitive and psychomotor parameters have to be taken into account when assessing experimental nociception in the elderly. Further studies are needed to evaluate possible report biases and to assess these interactions in old patients with pain and in mildly sensory, cognitive or motor impaired elderly subjects.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.