Tuberculin reactivity decreases with age despite epidemiologic evidence that the elderly are more likely to have been infected. Whether this phenomenon is due to lack of antigenic stimulus or host inability to mount a delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response is unclear. In order to determine if the DTH response to tetanus toxoid in an exposed population is a useful tool to understand the phenomenon of lack of tuberculin reactivity in the remotely exposed elderly, a trial of skin testing was undertaken. Seventy-seven residents of a Veterans Affairs domiciliary were skin-tested using solutions of tetanus toxoid, candida and mumps skin test antigen. The 35 subjects who had negative reaction to the tetanus skin test were randomized into two groups: one which received tetanus vaccination before repeat skin testing and one which did not. Positive skin test reactions occurred in 42 patients to tetanus toxoid, 44 to mumps and 37 to candida. Of the 35 randomized, 27 were available for repeat skin tests. None reacted to the repeat tetanus skin test although 5 reacted to other antigens to which they had previously been nonreactive. Tetanus toxoid was equal to other antigens in its ability to elicit a DTH response originally; however antigenic stimulation with vaccination did not elicit positive skin test in nonreactors. Lack of DTH response to tetanus toxoid in recently vaccinated patients implies that nonresponse was secondary to host factors rather than lack of antigenic stimulation.

Keywords:
Anergy, Skin testing, Tetanus toxoid, Tuberculin, Elderly
This content is only available via PDF.
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.