Despite the considerable amount of data published during the last 30 years concerning the hematological status of the aged, practitioners are still confronted with the problem of ‘normal’ or ‘physiological’ values in these subjects. Indeed, significantly different values are presented in the literature as normal for the aged, apparently depending on the various types of populations studied. Criteria used to define the subjects as ‘normal’ could be the main factor responsible for this discrepancy. Based on this hypothesis, we determined the values of usual blood cell parameters in two groups of apparently healthy subjects of over 75 years of age. Subjects of group A (16 men and 13 women) were selected according to the stringent criteria of the Senieur protocol and subjects of group B (15 men and 20 women) were recruited using ‘conventional’ admission criteria. For both groups, sex-matched young controls aged 20–29 years were tested in parallel. No clinically significant alteration was observed in group A, whereas more pronounced differences were found in group B. Our results confirm the necessity for stringent selection criteria in biological investigations in gerontology. Moreover, they demonstrate that blood cell parameters are not altered in the aged, provided that the latter are really ‘healthy’.

Keywords:
Blood cells, Physiological ageing, Selection criteria, Senieur protocol
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1987 S. Karger AG, Basel
1987
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.