Dittus et al. [Folia Primatologica 2019;90: 89–108] discuss conflicts in Sri Lanka between people and 4 subspecies of purple-faced langurs, 3 subspecies of toque macaques and a single grey langur subspecies. All of these subspecies are endemic and also listed by the IUCN as endangered or threatened with extinction due to extensive deforestation. Nevertheless, in order to mitigate conflicts with macaques, the above article recommended buffer zones that “should be at least 100–200 m wide, devoid of trees, shrubs and food sources: pasture could serve this purpose” [Dittus et al., 2019, p. 100]. This recommendation is presented without an explicit statement that buffer zones should not be carved out of existing primate habitats. Therefore, it could be misused by corrupt politicians and timber contractors to justify deforestation, even by expanding existing pastures that do not meet the width specifications prescribed by the article. These actions could undermine the survival of both langurs that rely exclusively on a vegetarian diet. Therefore, in my opinion, buffer zones as proposed by Dittus et al. [2019] are not a valid recommendation to mitigate human-monkey conflicts (HMCs) in Sri Lanka. I consider several other statements in the article also to have questionable relevance to mitigating HMCs in Sri Lanka. However, I discuss a commercially viable activity reported by Dittus et al. [2019] that could be used to mitigate HMCs and also promote monkey conservation in Sri Lanka. It derives from a time-tested and, therefore, successful business enterprise based on peaceful coexistence with monkeys that the authors of that article have undertaken at their field site in Polonnaruwa. However, they do not discuss the enterprise’s proven ability to promote peaceful coexistence with monkeys.Therefore, I explain how the enterprise could help communities throughout Sri Lanka to accrue financial benefits, by practicing peaceful coexistence with all monkey subspecies and promoting their conservation at the same time. This business model has the potential to strengthen Sri Lanka’s efforts to protect its unique contribution to global biological diversity from extinction.

Keywords:
Human-monkey conflict, Buffer zones, Ethnoprimatology
1.
Cabral SJ, Prasad T, Deeyagoda TP, Weerakkody SN, Nadarajah A, Rudran R (2018). Investigating Sri Lanka’s human-monkey conflict and developing a strategy to mitigate the problem. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10: 11391–11398.
2.
Department of Wildlife Conservation, Sri Lanka (2016). Strategy to conserve and coexist with Sri Lanka’s monkeys. Action Plan submitted to the Government of Sri Lanka for cabinet approval. 30 pages. Battaramulla, Department of Wildlife Conservation.
3.
Dittus WPJ (1974). The Behaviour and Ecology of the Toque monkey, Macaca sinica. PhD thesis, University of Maryland.
4.
Dittus WPJ (2012). Problems with pest monkeys: myths and solutions. Loris (Journal of the Wildlife and Nature Protection Society of Sri Lanka) 26: 18–23.
5.
Dittus WPJ, Gunathilake S, Felder M (2019). Assessing public perceptions and solutions to human-monkey conflict from 50 years in Sri Lanka. Folia Primatol 90: 89–108.
6.
Dittus W, Watson AC (2020). Macaca sinica. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2020: e.T12560A17951229.
https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T12560A17951229.en
(accessed April 7, 2021).
7.
Dittus W (2020). Semnopithecus priam ssp. thersites. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2020: e.T39841A17982835.
https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39841A17982835.en
(accessed April 7, 2021).
8.
Eisenberg JF, Muckenhirn NA, Rudran R (1972). The relation between ecology and social structure in Primates. Science 176: 863–874.
9.
Estrada E, Garber PA, Rylands AB, Fernandez-Duque E, Di Fiore A, Nekkaris KA, Nijman V, Heymann EK, Lambert JE, Rovero F, Barelli C, Setchell JM, Gillespie TR, Mittermeier RA, Arregoitia LV, de Guinea M, Gouveia S, Dobrovolski R, Shanee S, Shanee N, Boyle S, Fuentes A, MacKinnon K, Meyer ALS, Wich S, Sussman RW, Pan R, Kone I, Baoguo Li (2017). Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. Science Advances 3: 1–32.
10.
Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance (1993). Chapter 469. Printed at the Department of Government Printing, Sri Lanka.
11.
Fuentes A (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human-primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 101–117.
12.
Hocking J (2019). A model example of community-based conservation. https://medium.com/wild-without-end/a-model-example-of-community-based-conservation-b1d0a28fb37b.
13.
Jones-Engel L, Engel GA, Fuentes A (2011). Ethnoprimatological approach to interactions between human and nonhuman primates. In Field Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide (Setchell J, Curtis DJ, eds.), 2nd ed., pp 21–32. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
14.
Kothari A, Camill P, Brown J (2013). Conservation as if people also mattered: policy and practice of community based conservation. In Conservation and Society (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, ed.), Vol. 1, pp 1–15. Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer.
15.
Lee DE (2018). Evaluating conservation effectiveness in a Tanzanian community wildlife management area. Journal of Wildlife Management 82: 1767–1774.
16.
Mapa RB, Kumaragamage D, Gunarathne WDL, Dassanayake AR (2002). Land use in Sri Lanka: past, present and the future. Paper No. 974, 17th WCSS Conference in Thailand, August 14–21, 2002.
17.
Molur S, Brandon-Jones D, Dittus W, Eudey A, Kumar A, Singh M, Feroz MM, Chalise M, Priya P, Walker S (2003). Status of South Asian primates, Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) workshop report. Coimbatore, Zoo Outreach Organization/CBSG-South Asia.
18.
Mongabay (2018). Deforestation statistics for Sri Lanka. rainforests.mongabay.com (accessed May 8, 2020).
19.
Nekaris KAI, Boulton A, Nijman V (2013). An ethnoprimatological approach to assessing levels of tolerance between human and commensal non-human primates in Sri Lanka. Journal of Anthropological Science 91: 1–14.
20.
Ripley S (1967). Intertroop encounters among Ceylon gray langurs (Presbytis entellus). In Social Communication among Primates (Altmann SA, ed.), pp 237–253. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
21.
Ripley S (1970). Leaves and leaf monkeys: the social organization of foraging in grey langurs. In Old World Monkeys: Evolution, Systematics and Behaviour (Napier JR, Napier PH, eds.), pp 481–509. New York, Academic Press.
22.
Roe D (2014). Wanted: community wildlife conservation success stories. https://www.iied.org/wanted-community-wildlife-conservation-success-stories.
23.
Rudran R (1970). Aspects of Ecology of Two Subspecies of Purple-Faced Langurs. MSc thesis, University of Ceylon.
24.
Rudran R (1973a). Adult male replacement in one-male troops of purple-faced langurs (Presbytis senex). Folia Primatologica 19: 166–192.
25.
Rudran R (1973b). Reproductive cycles of two subspecies of purple-faced langurs (Presbytis senex) in relation to environmental factors. Folia Primatologica 19: 41–60.
26.
Rudran R (2007). A survey of Sri Lanka’s endangered and endemic western purple-faced langur (Trachypithecus vetulus nestor). Primate Conservation 22: 139–144.
27.
Rudran R (2013a). Purple-faced langur (Trachypithecus vetulus). In Mammals of South Asia (Johnsingh AJT, Manjrekar N, eds.), Vol. 1, pp 315–331. Himayatnagar, Universities Press (India) Ltd.
28.
Rudran R (2013b). Food habits and habitat use patterns of Sri Lanka’s western purple-faced langur. Primate Conservation 27: 99–108.
29.
Rudran R, Kotagama SW (2016). Strategy to conserve and coexist with Sri Lanka’s monkeys (abstract). In Proceedings of the 5th Asian Primate Symposium, October 18–22, 2016. p 16. Nugegoda, University of Sri Jayawardenepura.
30.
Rudran R, Dittus W, Gamage SN, Nekaris KAI (2020). Semnopithecus vetulus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2020: e.T22042A17959452.
https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T22042A17959452.en
(accessed April 7, 2021).
31.
Vandercone RP, Dinadh C, Wijethunga G (2012). Dietary diversity and food selection in Hanuman langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) and purple-faced langurs (Trachypithecus vetulus) in the Kaludiyapokuna Forest Reserve in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Primatology 33: 1382–1405.
32.
Weerathunghe C, Tissera M, Hewawasam G, Yaheya R (2017). Deforestation North of Wilpattu National Park, Site Visit Report. Colombo, Environmental Foundation (Guarantee) Ltd.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
2022
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.