When monkeys, such as the toque macaques (Macaca sinica) of Sri Lanka, seek food on the ground near human habitation, they may use electrical posts to escape aggression from conspecifics, dogs, or humans. Shields mounted on electrical posts prevented monkeys from reaching the electrical wires, thereby averting their electrocution: the frequency of electrocutions (n = 0) was significantly less (p < 0.001) in the 12 years after installation of the shields than in the 12 years before (n = 18). Electric shocks were either fatal (n = 14) or caused permanent injury (n = 4) (collectively referred to as electrocutions hereafter). The shields may find broader applications in other primate species and environments wherever monkeys are attracted by human food near electrical posts. Primates and other arboreal mammals also accessed live wires from trees; at known electrocution hotspots, short spans of exposed wires were insulated by encapsulating them in PVC water pipes. It was impossible, however, to prevent electrocutions from all electric supply infrastructures that put monkeys at risk. A wider use of insulated electric conductors in planning power distribution in habitats frequented by wild animals would be desirable in preventing electric shocks to wildlife.

1.
Al-Razi H, Maria M, Muzaffar SB (2019). Mortality of primates due to roads and power lines in two forest patches in Bangladesh. Zoologia 36: 1–6.
2.
Boinski S, Jack K, Lamarsh C, Coltrane JA (1998). Squirrel monkeys in Costa Rica: drifting to extinction. Oryx 32: 45–58.
3.
Dittus WPJ (1977a). The socioecological basis for the conservation of the toque monkey (Macaca sinica) of Sri Lanka (Ceylon). In Primate Conservation (Rainier PHSH, Bourne GH eds.), pp 237–265. New York, Academic Press.
4.
Dittus WPJ (1977b). The ecology of a semi-evergreen forest community in Sri Lanka. Biotropica 9: 268–286.
5.
Dittus WPJ (1986). Sex differences in fitness following a group take-over among toque macaques: testing models of social evolution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19: 257–266.
6.
Dittus WPJ (1987). Group fusion among wild toque macaques: an extreme case of inter-group resource competition. Behaviour 100: 248–291.
7.
Dittus WPJ (1988). Group fission among wild toque macaques as a consequence of female resource competition and environmental stress. Animal Behaviour 36: 1626–1645.
8.
Dittus WPJ, Thorington RW, Jr. (1981). Techniques for aging and sexing primates. In Techniques for the Study of Primate Population Ecology (Populations SoCoNP ed.), pp 81–134. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
9.
Dittus WPJ, Gunathilake KAS, Felder M (2019). Assessing public perceptions and solutions to human-monkey conflict from 50 years in Sri Lanka. Folia Primatologica 90: 89–108.
10.
Dwyer JF, Harness RE, Donohue K (2014). Predictive model of avian electrocution risk on overhead power lines. Conservation Biology 28: 159–168.
11.
Eudey A (2008). The crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis): widespread and rapidly declining. Primate Conservation 23: 129–132.
12.
Goulart VDLR, Teixeira CP, Young RJ (2010). Analysis of callouts made in relation to wild urban marmosets (Callithrix penicillata) and their implications for urban species management. European Journal of Wildlife Research 56: 641–649.
13.
Grand TI (1972). A mechanical interpretation of terminal branch feeding. Journal of Mammalogy 53: 198–201.
14.
Grand TI (1976). Differences in terrestrial velocity on Macaca and Presbytis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 45: 101–108.
15.
Gregory T, Carrasco-Rueda F, Alonso A, Kolowski J, Deichmann JL (2017). Natural canopy bridges effectively mitigate tropical forest fragmentation for arboreal mammals. Scientific Reports 7: 3892.
16.
Guil F, Fernández-Olalla M, Moreno-Opo R, Mosqueda I, Elena Gómez M, Aranda A, Arredondo Á, Guzman JM, Oria J, Garcia LMG, Margalida A (2011). Minimising mortality in endangered raptors due to power lines: the importance of spatial aggregation to optimize the application of mitigation measures. PLoS One 6: e28212.
17.
Jenkins A, Smallie JJ, Diamond M (2010). Avian collisions with power lines: a global review of causes and mitigation with a South African perspective. Bird Conservation International 20: 263–278.
18.
Katsis L, Cunneyworth PMK, Turner KME, Presotto A (2018). Spatial patterns of primate electrocutions in Diani, Kenya. International Journal of Primatology 39: 493–510.
19.
Kumar V, Kumar V (2015). Seasonal electrocution fatalities in free-range rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) of Shivalik hills area in northern India. Journal of Medical Primatology 44: 137–142.
20.
Lokschin LX, Printes RC, Cabral J, Nunes Hallal, Buss G (2007). Power lines and howler monkey conservation in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Neotropical Primates 14: 76–80.
21.
Maibeche Y, Moali A, Yahi N, Menard N (2015). Is diet flexibility an adaptive life trait for relictual and peri-urban populations of the endangered primate Macaca sylvanus? PLoS One 10: e0118596.
22.
Moore R, Nekaris AKI, Eschmann CL (2010). Habitat use by western purple-faced langurs Trachypithecus vetulus nestor (Colobinae) in a fragmented suburban landscape. Endangered Species Research 12: 227–234.
23.
Nekaris AKI, Jayewardene J (2004). Survey of the slender loris (Primates, Lorisidae Gray, 1821: Loris tardigradus Linnaeus, 1758 and Loris lydekkerianus Cabrera, 1908) in Sri Lanka. Journal of Zoology (London) 262: 327–338.
24.
Palei NC, Palei HS, Kar CS (2014). Mortaility of the endangered Asian elephant Elephas maximus by electrocution in Odisha, India. Oryx 48: 602–604.
25.
Parker L, Nijman V, Nekaris AKI (2008). When there is no forest left: fragmentation, local extinction, and small population sizes in the Sri Lankan western purple-faced langur. Endangered Species Research 5: 29–36.
26.
Pirta RS, Gadgil M, Karshikar AV (1997). Management of the rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta and Hanuman langur Presbytis entellus in Himchal Pradesh, India. Biological Conservation 79: 97–106.
27.
Printes RC (1999). The Lami Biological Reserve, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and the danger of power lines to howlers in urban reserves. Neotropical Primates 4: 135–136.
28.
Ram C, Sharma G, Rajpurohit LS (2015). Mortality and threats to Hanuman langurs (Semnopithecus entellus entellus) in and around Jodhpur (Rajasthan). Indian Forester 141: 1042–1045.
29.
Rodrigues NN, Martinez R (2014). Wildlife in our backyard: interactions between Wied’s marmoset Callithrix kuhlii (Primates: Callithrichidae) and residents of Ilheus, Bahia, Brazil. Wildlife Biology 20: 91–96.
30.
Roscoe CJ, De Silva M, Hapuarachchi NC, Krishanta RPA (2013). A new color morph of the southern purple-faced langur (Semnnopithecus vetulus vetulus) from the rainforests of southwestern Sri Lanka. Primate Conservation 26: 115–124.
31.
Rudran R (2007). A survey of Sri Lanka’s endangered and endemic western purple-faced langur (Trachypithecus vetulus nestor). Primate Conservation 22: 139–144.
32.
Singh M (2019). Management of forest-dwelling and urban species: case studies of the lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) and the bonnet macaque (M. radiata). International Journal of Primatology 40: 613–629.
33.
Southwick CH, Siddiqi MF, Farooqui MY, Pal BC (1976). Effects of artificial feeding on aggressive behaviour of rhesus monkeys in India. Animal Behaviour 24: 11–15.
34.
Teixeira FZ, Printes RC, Fagundes JCG, Alonso AC, Kindel A (2013). Canopy bridges as road overpasses for wildlife in urban fragmented landscapes. Biota Neotropica 13: 117–123.
35.
Tintó A, Real J, Mañosa S (2010). Predicting and correcting electrocution of birds in mediterranean areas. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 1852–1862.
36.
Valladares-Padua C, Cullen Jr. L, Padua S (1995). A pole bridge to avoid primate road kills. Neotropical Primates 3: 13–15.
37.
Wheatland Electric Cooperative, Inc., (2014). http://wheatlandeci.coopwebbuilder2.com/content/wildlife-protection.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.