Our study presents the first evidence on how target animacy impacts on manual laterality in the Hylobatidae and contributes to filling the knowledge gap between monkeys and great apes in primate evolution of emotional lateralization. Eleven captive individuals of northern white-cheeked gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys) were chosen as focal subjects. There were significantly more ambipreferent individuals than left/right-handed individuals for both inanimate (χ2(1, n = 11) = 7.364, p = 0.007) and animate (χ2(1, n = 11) = 4.455, p = 0.035) targets, meaning no significant group-level hand preference. The right hand was more frequently used than the left hand for inanimate targets whereas the left hand was more frequently used than the right hand for animate targets, although the interaction between target animacy and hand use was not significant (proportion: F1, 10 = 0.283, p = 0.607; rate: F1, 10 = 0.228, p = 0.643). Our findings in N. leucogenys could not fully support either the tool use theory or the right hemisphere hypothesis.

Keywords:
Cerebral lateralization, Hand preference, Hylobatidae, Right hemisphere hypothesis, Target animacy, Tool use theory
1.
Borod JC, Cicero BA, Obler LK, Welkowitz J, Erhan HM, Santschi C, Grunwald IS, Agosti RM, Whalen JR (1998). Right hemisphere emotional perception: evidence across multiple channels. Neuropsychology 12: 446–458.
2.
Corballis MC (2002). From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
3.
Davidson RJ (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In Brain Asymmetry (Davidson RJ, Hugdahl K, eds.), pp 361–387. Cambridge, MIT Press.
4.
Demaree HA, Everhart DE, Youngstrom EA, Harrison DW (2005). Brain lateralization of emotional processing: historical roots and a future incorporating “dominance.” Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 4: 3–20.
5.
Fagot J, Vauclair J (1991). Manual laterality in nonhuman primates: a distinction between handedness and manual specialization. Psychological Bulletin 109: 76–89.
6.
Fan PL, Liu CY, Chen HY, Liu XF, Zhao DP, Zhang JG, Liu DZ (2017). Preliminary study on hand preference in captive northern white-cheeked gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys). Primates 58: 75–82.
7.
Forrester GS, Crawley M, Palmer C (2014). Social environment elicits lateralized navigational paths in two populations of typically developing children. Brain and Cognition 91: 21–27.
8.
Forrester GS, Leavens DA, Quaresmini C, Vallortigara G (2011). Target animacy influences gorilla handedness. Animal Cognition 14: 903–907.
9.
Forrester GS, Quaresmini C, Leavens DA, Mareschal D, Thomas MSC (2013). Human handedness: an inherited evolutionary trait. Behavioural Brain Research 237: 200–206.
10.
Forrester GS, Quaresmini C, Leavens DA, Spiezio C, Vallortigara G (2012). Target animacy influences chimpanzee handedness. Animal Cognition 15: 1121–1127.
11.
Gibbs SEB, Lea SEG, Jacobs LF (2007). Flexible use of spatial cues in the southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans). Animal Cognition 10: 203–209.
12.
Greenfield PM (1991). Language, tools, and brain: the ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 531–551.
13.
Hauser MD (1993). Right hemisphere dominance for the production of facial expression in monkeys. Science 261: 475–477.
14.
Heestand JE (1987). Behavioral Lateralization in Four Species of Apes? PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
15.
Hook-Costigan MA, Rogers LJ (1998). Lateralized use of the mouth in production of vocalizations by marmosets. Neuropsychologia 36: 1265–1273.
16.
Hopkins WD (1999). On the other hand: statistical issues in the assessment and interpretation of hand preference data in nonhuman primates. International Journal of Primatology 20: 851–866.
17.
Hopkins WD (2007). The Evolution of Hemispheric Specialization in Primates. San Diego, Academic Press.
18.
Hopkins WD (2013). Comparing human and nonhuman primate handedness: challenges and a modest proposal for consensus. Developmental Psychobiology 55: 621–636.
19.
Jones LV, Fiske DW (1953). Models for testing significance of combined results. Psychological Bulletin 50: 375–382.
20.
Leliveld LMC, Langbein J, Puppe B (2013). The emergence of emotional lateralization: evidence in non-human vertebrates and implications for farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 145: 1–14.
21.
Levy J (1977). The mammalian brain and the adaptive advantage of cerebral asymmetry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 299: 264–272.
22.
Lindell AK (2013). Continuities in emotion lateralization in human and non-human primates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 464.
23.
MacNeilage PF, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2009). Origins of the left and right brain. Scientific American 301: 60–67.
24.
Marchant LF, McGrew WC (1998). Human handedness: an ethological perspective. Human Evolution 13: 221–228.
25.
Porac C, Coren S (1981). Lateral Preferences and Human Behavior. New York, Springer.
26.
Quaresmini C, Forrester GS, Spiezio C, Leavens, DA, Vallortigara G (2014). Social environment elicits lateralized behaviors in gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 128: 276–284.
27.
Regaiolli B, Spiezio C, Hopkins WD (2018). Hand preference on unimanual and bimanual tasks in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). American Journal of Primatology 80: e22745.
28.
Robins A, Rogers LJ (2006). Lateralized visual and motor responses in the green tree frog, Litoria caerulea. Animal Behaviour 72: 843–852.
29.
Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (2002). Comparative Vertebrate Lateralization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
30.
Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (2013). Divided Brains: The Biology and Behaviour of Brain Asymmetries. New York, Cambridge University Press.
31.
Rutherford HJV, Lindell AK (2011). Thriving and surviving: approach and avoidance motivation and lateralization. Emotion Review 3: 333–343.
32.
Salva OR, Regolin L, Mascalzoni E, Vallortigara G (2012). Cerebral and behavioural asymmetry in animal social recognition. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews 7: 110–138.
33.
Stafford DK, Milliken GW, Ward JP (1990). Lateral bias in feeding and brachiation in Hylobates. Primates 31: 407–414.
34.
Stewart CB, Disotell TR (1998). Primate evolution – in and out of Africa. Current Biology 8: R582–R588.
35.
Versace E, Vallortigara G (2015). Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 233.
36.
Wallez C, Vauclair J (2013). Human (Homo sapiens) and baboon (Papio papio) chimeric face processing: right-hemisphere involvement. Journal of Comparative Psychology 127: 237–244.
37.
Ward JP, Hopkins WD (1993). Primate Laterality: Current Behavioral Evidence of Primate Asymmetries. New York, Springer.
38.
Wiper ML (2017). Evolutionary and mechanistic drivers of laterality: a review and new synthesis. Laterality 22: 740–770.
39.
Zhao DP, Hopkins WD, Li BG (2012). Handedness in nature: first evidence of manual laterality on bimanual coordinated tube task in wild primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 148: 36–44.
40.
Zhao DP, Tian XL, Liu XC, Chen ZY, Li BG (2016). Effect of target animacy on hand preference in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Animal Cognition 19: 977–985.
41.
Zhao DP, Wang Y, Han KJ, Zhang HB, Li BG (2015). Does target animacy influence manual laterality of monkeys? First answer from northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina). Animal Cognition 18: 931–936.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.