Female dominance is often associated with lemurs. However, consensus does not exist among primatologists on how to define, measure, or explain female dominance. This review explores the utility of applying a broader concept of power to understanding lemur intersexual relationships. In this framework, power is defined as arising from an asymmetry in a dyadic relationship and can be divided into 2 types: dominance and leverage. Intersexual asymmetries based upon females having superior fighting ability are considered female dominance. However, economic power also exists, and females with resource-based power exhibit female leverage. Additionally, power has 4 characteristics (base, means, amount, and scope) that describe the precise nature of observed phenomena. This article utilizes the 4 characteristics outlined in the power framework to review the existing “female dominance” literature for lemurs and highlights the value of adopting both an expanded concept of power and a more precise language. By placing the multiple phenomena currently labeled under the single term “female dominance” within the power framework, much of the confusion disappears. Thus, not only is the debate reframed, facilitating endeavors to find evolutionary explanations, but the uniqueness of female power in lemurs can be determined empirically rather than by definition.

1.
Beisner BA, Hannibal DL, Finn KR, Fushing H, McCowan B (2016). Social power, conflict policing, and the role of subordination signals in rhesus macaque society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 160: 102–112.
2.
Bernstein IS (1981). Dominance: the baby and the bathwater. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 419–457.
3.
Brockman DK (1994). Reproduction and Mating System ofVerreaux’s sifaka, Propithecus verreauxi, at
4.
Beza Mahafaly, Madagascar. [PhD thesis], New Haven, Yale University.
5.
Brockman DK (1999). Reproductive behavior of female Propithecus verreauxi at Beza-Mahafaly, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 20: 375–398.
6.
Charpentier MJE, Drea CM (2013). Victims of infanticide and conspecific bite wounding in a female-dominant primate: a long-term study. PLos One8: e82830.
7.
Clutton-Brock TH (1985). Size, sexual dimorphism, and polygyny in primates. In Size and Scaling in Primate Biology (Jungers WL, ed.), pp 51–60. New York, Plenum Press.
8.
Clutton-Brock TH, Huchard E (2013). Social competition and selection in males and females. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 368: 20130074.
9.
Clutton-Brock T, Janson C (2012). Primate socioecology at the crossroads: past, present, and future. Evolutionary Anthropolology 21: 136–150.
10.
de Waal FBM (1986). The integration of dominance and social bonding in primates. Quarterly Review of Biology 61: 459–479.
11.
Digby LJ, Kahlenberg SM (2002). Female dominance in blue-eyed black lemurs (Eulemur macaco flavifrons). Primates 43: 191–199.
12.
Dunham AE (2008). Battle of the sexes: cost asymmetry explains female dominance in lemurs. Animal Behavior76: 1435–1439.
13.
Drews C (1993). The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour 125: 283–313.
14.
Eichmueller P, Thorén S, Radespiel U (2013). The lack of female dominance in golden-brown mouse lemurs suggests alternative routes in lemur social evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology150: 158–164.
15.
Erhart EM, Overdorff DJ (1999). Female coordination of group travel in wild Propithecus and Eulemur. International Journal of Primatology 20: 927–940.
16.
Flack JC, de Waal F (2007). Context modulates signal meaning in primate communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 1581–1586.
17.
Flack JC, Krackauer DC (2006). Encoding power in communication networks. American Naturalist 168: E87–E102.
18.
French JA, Mustoe AC, Cavanaugh J, Birnie AK (2013). The influence of androgenic steroid hormones on female aggression in atypical mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B68: 20130084.
19.
Génin F, Schilling A, Perret M (1996). Social inhibition of seasonal fattening in wild and captive gray mouse lemurs. Physiology and Behavior 86: 185–194.
20.
Gerson JS (2000). Social Relationships in Wild Red-Fronted Brown Lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus) [PhD thesis]. Durham, Duke University.
21.
Hand JL (1986). Resolution of social conflicts: dominance, egalitarianism, spheres of dominance, and game theory. Quarterly Review of Biology61: 201–220.
22.
Henzi SP, Barrett L (2002). Infants as a commodity in a baboon market. Animal Behavior 63: 915–921.
23.
Hinde RA, Datta S (1981). Dominance: an intervening variable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 442.
24.
Hohenbrink H, Koberstein-Schwarz M, Zimmermann E, Radespiel U (2015). Shades of gray mouse lemurs: ontogeny of female dominance and dominance-related behaviors in a nocturnal primate. American Journal of Primatology77: 1158–1169.
25.
Hohenbrink H, Schaarschmidt F, Bünemann K, Gerberding S, Zimmermann E, Radespiel U (2016). Female dominance in two basal primates, Microcebus murinus and Microcebus lehilahytsara: variation and determinants. Animal Behavior122: 145–156.
26.
Holenkamp KE, Engh AL (2009). Reproductive skew in female-dominated mammalian societies. In Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes (Hager R, Jones CB, eds.), pp 53–83. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hrdy SB (1979). Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethology and Sociobiology 1: 13–40.
28.
Hrdy SB (1981). The Woman that Never Evolved. Cambridge, Harvard University.
29.
Jacobs A, Sueur C, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2011). Social network influences decision making during collective movements in brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus). International Journal of Primatology 32: 721–736.
30.
Jarcho MR, Mendoza SP, Bales KL (2012). Hormonal and experiential predictors of infant survivorship and maternal behavior in a monogamous primate (Callicebus cupreus). American Journal of Primatology 74: 462–470.
31.
Jolly A (1966). Lemur Behavior: A Madagascar Field Study. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
32.
Jolly A (1984). The puzzle of female feeding priority. In Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists (Small M, ed.), pp 197–215. New York, Liss.
33.
Kappeler PM (1990a). Female dominance in Lemur catta: more than just female feeding priority. Folia Primatologica 55: 92–95.
34.
Kappeler PM (1990b). The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates. American Journal of Primatology 21: 201–214.
35.
Kappeler PM (1993a). Female dominance in primates and other mammals. In: Perspectives in Ethology (Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH, Thompson NS, eds.), pp 143–158. New York, Plenum Press.
36.
Kappeler PM (1993b). Variation in social structure: the effects of sex and kinship on social interactions in three lemur species. Ethology 93: 125–145.
37.
Kappeler PM (1996). Intrasexual selection and phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of sexual canine size dimorphism in strepsirhine primates. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 43–65.
38.
Kappeler PM (2000). Causes and consequences of unusual sex ratios among lemurs. In Primate Males: Causes and Consequences of Variation in Group Composition (Kappeler PM, ed.), pp 55–63. Cambridge, Cambridge University.
39.
Kraus C, Heistermann M, Kappeler PM (1999). Physiological suppression of sexual function of subordinate males: a subtle form of intrasexual competition among male sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi)? Physiology and Behavior 66: 855–861.
40.
Kubzdela KS (1997). Sociodemography in Diurnal Primates: The Effects of Group Size and Female Dominance Rank on Intra-group Spatial Distribution, Feeding Competition, Female Reproductive Success, and Female Dispersal Patterns in White Sifaka, Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi [PhD thesis]. Chicago, University of Chicago.
41.
Kulachi IG, Ghazanfar AA, Rubenstein DI (2018). Knowledgeable lemurs become more central in social networks. Current Biology 28: 1306–1310.
42.
Lawler RR (2003). Causes and consequences of differential reproductive success in male white sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi)[PhD thesis]. New Haven, Yale University.
43.
Leimberger K, Lewis RJ (2017). Male strategies for changing group membership in Verreaux’s sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi). American Journal of Primatology 79: e22455
44.
Lewis RJ (2002). Beyond dominance: the importance of leverage. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 149–164.
45.
Lewis RJ (2004). Sources of Variation in Male-Female Relationships: Power, Conflict, and Cooperation[PhD thesis]. Durham, Duke University.
46.
Lewis RJ (2008). Social influences on group membership in Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi. International Journal of Primatology 29: 1249–1270.
47.
Lewis RJ (2010). Grooming patterns in Verreaux’s sifaka. American Journal of Primatology 72: 254–261.
48.
Lewis RJ (2018). Female power in primates and the phenomenon of “female dominance”. Annual Review of Anthropology 47: 533–551.
49.
Lewis RJ (2019). Subordination signals improve the quality of social relationships in Verreaux’s sifaka: implications for the evolution of power structures and social complexity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology169: 599–607.
50.
Lewis RJ, Kappeler PM (2005). Seasonality, body condition, and timing of reproduction in Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi in the Kirindy Forest. American Journal of Primatology 67: 347–364.
51.
Lewis RJ, van Schaik CP (2007). Bimorphism in male Verreaux’s sifaka in the Kirindy Forest of Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 28: 159–182.
52.
Marolf B, McElligot AG, Müller AE (2007). Female social dominance in two Eulemur species with different social organizations. Zoo Biology 26: 201–214.
53.
Meredith SL (2018). Sex-typed social development in Lemur catta. Folia Primatologica 89: 224–239.
54.
Mitani JC, Gros-Louis J, Manson JH (1996). Number of males in primate groups: comparative tests of competing hypotheses. American Journal of Primatology 38: 315–332.
55.
Nakamichi M, Koyama N (1997). Social relationships among ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) in two free-ranging troops at Berenty Reserve, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 18: 73–92.
56.
Noë R (1990). A veto game played by baboons: a challenge to the use of the Prisoner’s Dilemma as a paradigm for reciprocity and cooperation. Animal Behavior39: 78–90.
57.
Noë R, Hammerstein P (1994). Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35: 1–11.
58.
Noë R, Hammerstein P (1995). Biological markets. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 336–339.
59.
Noë R, van Schaik CP, van Hooff JARAM (1991). The market effect: an explanation for pay-off asymmetries among collaborating animals. Ethology 87: 97–118.
60.
Norscia I, Palagi E (2008). Berenty 2006: census of Propithecus verreauxi and possible evidence of population stress. International Journal of Primatology 29: 1099–1115.
61.
Norscia I, Palagi E (2011). Do wild brown lemurs reconcile? Not always. Ethology 29: 181–185.
62.
Norscia I, Palagi E (2015). The socio-matrix reloaded: from hierarchy to dominance profile in wild lemurs. PeerJ 3: e729.
63.
Norscia I, Palagi E (eds.) (2016). The Missing Lemur Link: An Ancestral Step in the Evolution of Human Behaviour. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
64.
Overdorff DJ, Erhart EM, Mutschler T (2005). Does female dominance facilitate feeding priority in black-and-white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) in southeastern Madagascar? American Journal of Primatology 66: 7–22.
65.
Palagi E, Antonacci D, Norscia I (2008). Peacemaking on treetops: first evidence of reconciliation from a wild prosimian (Propithecus verreauxi). Animal Behaviour 76: 737–747.
66.
Palagi E, Norscia I (2015). The season for peace: reconciliation in a despotic species (Lemur catta). PLoS One 10: e0142150.
67.
Pereira ME (1991). Asynchrony within estrous synchrony among ringtailed lemur (Primates, Lemuridae). Physiology& Behavior 49: 47–52.
68.
Pereira ME (1993). Agonistic interactions, dominance relation, and ontogenetic trajectories in ringtailed lemurs. In Juvenile Primates: Life History, Development, and Behavior (Pereira ME, Fairbanks LA, eds.), pp 285–305. New York, Oxford University.
69.
Pereira ME (2006). Obsession with agonistic power. In Ringtailed Lemur Biology: Lemur catta in Madagascar (Jolly A, Sussman RW, Koyama N, Rasamimanana H, eds.), pp 245–270. New York, Springer.
70.
Pereira ME, Kappeler PM (1997). Divergent systems of agonistic behaviour in lemurid primates. Behaviour 134: 225–274.
71.
Pereira ME, Kaufman R, Kappeler PM, Overdorff DJ (1990). Female dominance does not characterize all of the Lemuridae. Folia Primatologica 55 :96–103.
72.
Pereira ME, McGlynn CA (1997). Special relationships instead of female dominance for redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus. American Journal of Primatology 43: 239–258.
73.
Perret M (1996). Manipulation of sex ratio at birth by urinary cues in a prosimian primate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology38: 259–266.
74.
Petty JMA, Drea CM (2015). Female rule in lemurs is ancestral and hormonally mediated. Scientific Reports5: 9631.
75.
Pochron ST, Fitzgerald J, Gilbert CC, Lawrence D, Grgas M, Rakotonirina G, Ratsimbazafy R, Rakotosoa R, Wright PC (2003). Patterns of female dominance in Propithecus diadema edwardsi of Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology 61: 173–185.
76.
Powzyk JA (1998). The Soci-Ecology of Two Sympatric Indrids, Propithecus diadema diadema and Indri indri: A Comparison of Feeding Strategies and Their Possible Repercussions on Species-Specific Behaviors[PhD thesis]. Durham, Duke University.
77.
Radespiel U, Zimmermann E (2001). Female dominance in captive grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus). American Journal of Primatology 54: 181–192.
78.
Ralls K (1976). Mammals in which females are larger than males. Quarterly Review of Biology51: 245–276.
79.
Richard AF (1987). Malagasy prosimians: female dominance. In Primate Societies(Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT, eds.), pp 25–33. Chicago, University of Chicago.
80.
Richard AF, Dewar RE, Schwartz M, Ratsirarson J (2000). Mass change, environmental variability and female fertility in wild Propithecus verreauxi. Journal of Human Evolution 39: 381–391.
81.
Richard AF, Heimbuch R (1975). An analysis of the social behavior of three groups of Propithecus verreauxi. In Lemur Biology (Tattersall I, Sussman RW, eds.), pp 313–333. New York, Plenum Press.
82.
Roeder J-J, Duval L, Gosset D (2002). Aggressive and neutral interventions in conflicts in captive groups of brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 118: 253–258.
83.
Roeder J-J, Fornasieri I (1995). Does agonistic dominance imply feeding priority in lemurs? A study in Eulmur fulvus mayottensis. International Journal of Primatology 16: 629–641.
84.
Rowell TE (1974). The concept of social dominance. Behavioral Biology 11: 131–154.
85.
Sauther ML (1993). Resource competition in wild populations of ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta): implications for female dominance. In Lemur Social Systems and Their Ecological Basis(Kappeler PM, Ganzhorn JU, eds.), pp 135–152. New York, Plenum Press.
86.
Sauther ML, Sussman RW, Gould L (1999). The socioecology of the ringtailed lemur: thirty-five years of research. Evolutionary Anthropology8: 120–132.
87.
Schülke O, Kappeler PM (2003). So near and yet so far: territorial pairs but low cohesion between pair partners in a nocturnal lemur, Phaner furcifer. Animal Behavior65: 331–343.
88.
Smith SM (1982). Raptor “reverse” dimorphism revisited: a new hypothesis. Oikos 39: 118–122.
89.
Smith RJ, Jungers WL (1997). Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution 32: 523–559.
90.
Strier KB (1994). Myth of the typical primate. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology37: 233–271.
91.
Strier KB (2017). What does variation in primate behavior mean? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 162(Suppl 63): 4–14.
92.
Sussman RW (1975). A preliminary study of the behavior and ecology of Lemur fulvus rufus Audebert 1800. In Lemur Biology (Tattersall I, Sussman RW, eds.), pp 237–258. New York, Plenum Press.
93.
van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM (1993). Life history, activity period and lemur social systems. In Lemur Social Systems and Their Ecological Basis(Kappeler PM, Ganzhorn JU, eds.), pp 243–263. New York, Plenum Press.
94.
van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM (1996). The social systems of gregarious lemurs: lack of convergence with anthropoids due to evolutionary disequilibrium? Ethology 102: 915–941.
95.
Vervaecke H, de Vries H, van Elsacker L (2000). Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive group of bonobos (Pan paniscus). International Journal of Primatology 21: 47–68.
96.
Voyt RA, Sandel AA, Lewis RJ (in press). Female power in Verreaux’s sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi) is based on maturity, not body size. International Journal of Primatology.
97.
Waeber PO, Hemelrijk CK (2003). Female dominance and social structure in Aloatran gentle lemurs. Behaviour 140: 1235–1246.
98.
Wittig RM, Boesch C (2003). The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour 140: 1527–1559.
99.
Wright PC (1993). Variations in male-female dominance and offspring care in non-human primates. In Sex and Gender Hierarchies(Mille BD, ed.), pp 127–145. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
100.
Wright PC (1999). Lemur traits and Madagascar ecology: coping with an island environment. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology42: 31–72.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.