Confiscated slow lorises (Nycticebus spp.) at Bangpra Water-Bird Breeding Center (BWBC) in Thailand provided an opportunity to demonstrate the application of noninvasive genetic approaches for species identification when morphology of the animals was ambiguous. The slow lorises at BWBC had been assigned to either N. bengalensis or N. pygmaeus, based on body size. However, the morphology of N. bengalensis is highly variable and overlaps with that of N. coucang (sensu stricto). Phylogenetic analysis of cytochrome b and d-loop mitochondrial regions placed all confiscated N. pygmaeus with the published sequences of N. pygmaeus and distinguished them from other Nycticebus. All other confiscated individuals formed a monophyletic clade, most individuals grouping with published N. bengalensis sequences from wild populations in Vietnam and distinct from Peninsular Malaysian and Sumatran N. coucang, Javan N. javanicus and Bornean N. menagensis. Six individuals within the N. bengalensis clade formed a separate subgroup that did not group with any reference material as indicated by phylogenetic and haplotype network analyses. Whether these trafficked individuals are undiscovered wild populations will require further investigation. Additional genetic studies of wild slow loris populations in different regions are therefore urgently required for reference to aid the protection and conservation of these threatened species.

Keywords:
Confiscated wildlife, Slow loris, Nycticebus, Mitochondrial DNA, Species identification
1.
Ahlers N, Creecy J, Frankham G, Johnson RN, Kotze A, Linacre A, McEwing R, Mwale M, Rovie-Ryan JJ, Sitam F, Webster LMI (2017). “ForCyt” DNA database of wildlife species. Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series 6: e466–e468.
2.
Ball MC, Finnegan LA, Nette T, Broders HG, Wilson PJ (2011). Wildlife forensics: “supervised” assignment testing can complicate the association of suspect cases to source populations. Forensic Science International Genetics 5: 50–56.
3.
Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A (1999). Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 37–48.
4.
Blair ME, Le MD, Thạch HM, Panariello A, Vũ NB, Sethi G, Sterling EJ (2017). Applying systems thinking to inform studies of wildlife trade in primates. American Journal of Primatology 79: e22715.
5.
Chen J, Pan D, Groves C, Wang Y, Narushima E, Fitch-Snyder H, Crow P, Thanh VN, Ryder O, Zhang H, Fu Y, Zhang Y (2006). Molecular phylogeny of Nycticebus inferred from mitochondrial genes. International Journal of Primatology 27: 1187–1200.
6.
Chen W, Newman C, Liu Z, Kaneko Y, Omote K, Masuda R, Buesching CD, Macdonald DW, Xie Z, Zhou Y (2015). The illegal exploitation of hog badgers (Arctonyx collaris) in China: genetic evidence exposes regional population impacts. Conservation Genetics Resources 7: 697–704.
7.
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010). Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567.
8.
Gentile G, Ciambotta M, Tapia W (2013). Illegal wildlife trade in Galápagos: molecular tools help the taxonomic identification of confiscated iguanas and guide their rapid repatriation. Conservation Genetics Resources 5: 867–872.
9.
Groves CP (1971) Systematics of the genus Nycticebus. In Taxonomy, Anatomy, Reproduction. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Primatology, Vol. 1 (Biegert J, Leutenegger W, eds.), pp 44–53. Basel, Karger.
10.
Groves CP (1998). Systematics of tarsiers and lorises. Primates 39: 13–27.
11.
Groves CP (2004). The what, why and how of primate taxonomy. International Journal of Primatology25: 1105–1126.
12.
Groves CP (2017). Primates (Taxonomy). In The International Encyclopedia of Primatology (Fuentes A, ed.), pp 1–9. Hoboken, Wiley & Sons.
13.
Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
14.
Hill WCO (1952). Primates: Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy. Strepsirhini. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
15.
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
16.
Ishida Y, Georgiadis NJ, Hondo T, Roca AL (2013). Triangulating the provenance of African elephants using mitochondrial DNA. Evolutionary Applications 6: 253–265.
17.
Kobayashi N, Tamura K, Aotsuka T (1999). PCR error and molecular population genetics. Biochemical Genetics 37: 317–321.
18.
Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Pääbo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989). Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 86: 6196–6200.
19.
Kumar S, Strecher G, Tamura K (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger dataset. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33:1870–1874.
20.
Leigh JW, Bryant D (2015). PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 1110–1116.
21.
Lü X, Fu Y, Zhang Y (2002). Evolution of mitochondrial cytochrome b pseudogene in genus Nycticebus. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 2337–2341.
22.
Mondol S, Sridhar V, Yadav P, Gubbi S, Ramakrishnan U (2014). Tracing the geographic origin of traded leopard body parts in the Indian subcontinent with DNA-based assignment tests. Conservation Biology 29: 556–564.
23.
Munds RA, Nekaris KAI, Ford SM (2013). Taxonomy of the Bornean slow loris, with new species Nycticebus kayan (Primate, Lorisidae). American Journal of Primatology 75: 46–56.
24.
Mwale M, Dalton DL, Jansen R, DeBruyn M, Pietersen D, Mokgokong PS, Kotzé A (2017). Forensic application of DNA barcoding for identification of illegally traded African pangolin scales. Genome 60: 272–284.
25.
Nekaris KAI, Bearder SK (2011). The strepsirrhine primates of Asia and mainland Africa: diversity shrouded in darkness. In Primates in Perspective (Campbell C, Fuentes A, Mackinnon KC, Bearder SK, Sumpf RM, eds.), pp 24–45. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
26.
Nekaris KAI, Nijman V (2007). CITES proposal highlights rarity of Asian nocturnal primates (Lorisidae: Nycticebus). Folia Primatologica 78: 211–214.
27.
Nekaris KAI, Starr CR (2015). Conservation and ecology of the neglected slow loris: priorities and prospects. Endangered Species Research 28: 87–95.
28.
Ogden R, Dawnay N, McEwing R (2009). Wildlife DNA forensics – bridging the gap between conservation genetics and law enforcement. Endangered Species Research 9: 179–195.
29.
Osterberg P, Nekaris KAI (2015). The use of animals as photo props to attract tourists in Thailand: a case study of the slow loris Nycticebus spp. Traffic Bulletin 27: 13–18.
30.
Osterberg P, Samphanthamit P, Maprang O, Punnadee S, Brockelman WY (2015). Gibbon (Hylobates lar) reintroduction success in Phuket, Thailand, and its conservation benefits. American Journal of Primatology 77: 492–501.
31.
Pan D, Chen H, Groves C, Wang Y, Narushima E, Fitch-Snyder H, Crow P, Jinggong X, Thanh VN, Ryder O, Chemnick L, Zhang H, Fu Y, Zhang Y (2007). Mitochondrial control region and population genetic patterns of Nycticebus bengalensis and N. pygmaeus. International Journal of Primatology 28: 791–799.
32.
Parson W, Pegoraro K, Niederstätter H, Föger M, Steinlechner M (2000). Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene. International Journal of Legal Medicine 114: 23–28.
33.
Pozzi L, Nekaris KA, Perkin A, Bearder SK, Pimley ER, Schulze H, Streicher U, Nadler T, Kitchener A, Zischler H, Zinner D, Roos C (2015). Remarkable ancient divergence amonst neglected lorisiform primates. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 175: 661–674.
34.
Rambaut A (2007). Edinburgh: FigTree v. 1.4.3. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed March 15, 2018).
35.
Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ (2014). Edinburgh: Tracer v. 1.6. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (accessed March 15, 2018).
36.
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003). MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
37.
Roos C, Boonratana R, Supriatna J, Fellowes JR, Groves CP, Nash SD, Rylands AB, Mittermeier RA (2014). An updated taxonomy and conservation status review of Asian primates. Asian Primates Journal 4: 2–38.
38.
Smith O, Wang J (2014). When can noninvasive samples provide sufficient information in conservation genetics studies? Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 1011–1023.
39.
Somura H, Hori H, Manome Y (2012). Sequence analysis of mitochondrial DNAs of 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) regions in slow lorises (genus Nycticebus) may contribute to improved identification of confiscated specimens. International Scholarly Research Network Zoology2012: ID 498731.
40.
Starr C, Nekaris KAI, Streicher U, Leung L (2010). Traditional use of slow lorises Nycticebus bengalensis and N. pygmaeus in Cambodia: an impediment to their conservation. Endangered Species Research 12: 17–23.
41.
Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004). Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 11030–11035.
42.
Thalmann O, Hebler J, Poinar HN, Pääbo S, Vigilant L (2004). Unreliable mtDNA data due to nuclear insertions: a cautionary tale from analysis of humans and other great apes. Molecular Ecology 13: 321–335.
43.
Zhang H, Miller MP, Yang F, Chan HK, Gaubert P, Ades G, Fischer GA (2015). Molecular tracing of confiscated pangolin scales for conservation and illegal trade monitoring in Southeast Asia. Global Ecology and Conservation 4: 414–422.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.