The shared evolutionary histories and anatomical similarities between humans and non-human primates create dynamic interconnections between these alloprimates. In this foreword to Folia Primatologica's special issue on “Ethnographic Approaches in Primatology,” we review the ethnographic method and existing literature at the intersection of primatology and ethnography. We summarize, compare and contrast the 5 contributions to this special issue to highlight why the human-non-human primate interface is a compelling area to investigate via ethnographic approaches and to encourage increased incorporation of ethnography into the discipline of primatology. Ethnography is a valuable and increasingly popular tool with its use no longer limited to anthropological practitioners investigating traditional, non-Western peoples. Scholars from many disciplines now use ethnographic methods to investigate all members of our globalised world, including non-humans. As our closest living relatives, non-human primates (hereafter “primates”) are compelling subjects and thus appear in a range of contexts within ethnographic investigations. The goal of this special issue is to highlight the trajectory of research at the intersection of primatology and ethnography and to illustrate the importance of ethnographic methods for the advancement of primatology as a discipline.

Arlet ME, Molleman F (2010). Farmers' perceptions of the impact of wildlife on small-scale cacao cultivation at the northern periphery of Dja Faunal Reserve, Cameroon. African Primates 7: 27-34.
Cassidy R, Mullin M (2007). Where the Wild Things Are Now: Domestication Reconsidered. Oxford, Berg.
Cormier LA (2006). A preliminary review of Neotropical primates in the subsistence and symbolism of indigenous lowland South American peoples. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology 2: 14-32.
Dore KM (under review). Ethnoprimatology without conservation: the political ecology of farmer-vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) relations in St. Kitts, West Indies. International Journal of Primatology.
Dore KM, Eller AR, Eller JL (2018). Identity construction and symbolic association in farmer-vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) interconnections in St. Kitts. Folia Primatologica 89: 63-80.
Fife W (2005). Doing Fieldwork: Ethnographic Methods for Research in Developing Countries and Beyond. New York, Palgrave MacMillan.
Fuentes A (2010). Naturecultural encounters in Bali: monkeys, temples, tourists and ethnoprimatology. Cultural Anthropology 25: 600-624.
Fuentes A (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human-primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41: 101-117.
Gillingham S, Lee PC (2003). People and protected areas: a study of local perceptions of wildlife crop-damage conflict in an area bordering the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oryx 37: 316-325.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, Aldine.
Gobo G (2008). Doing Ethnography. London, Sage Publications Ltd.
Goldman MJ, Roque de Pinho J, Perry J (2010). Maintaining complex relations with large cats: Maasai and lions in Kenya and Tanzania. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15: 332-346.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P (2003). What is ethnography? In Ethnography (Hammersley M, Atkinson P, eds.), pp 1-22. London, Routledge.
Hill CM (1997). Crop-raiding by wild vertebrates: the farmer's perspective in an agricultural community in western Uganda. International Journal of Pest Management 43: 77-84.
Hill CM (2004). Farmers' perspectives of conflict at the wildlife-agriculture boundary: some lessons learned from African subsistence farmers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9: 279-286.
Hill CM (2005). People, crops and primates: a conflict of interests. In Commensalism and Conflict: The Primate-Human Interface (Patterson J, Wallis J, eds.), pp 40-59. San Antonio, American Society of Primatology.
Hill CM, Webber AD (2010). Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human-wildlife conflict scenarios. American Journal of Primatology 72: 919-924.
Hill CM, Webber AD, Priston NEC (eds.) (2017). Understanding Conflicts about Wildlife: A Biosocial Approach (Studies of the Biosocial Society). New York, Berghahn Books.
Ingold T, Palsson G (2013). Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Jalais A (2010). Forest of Tigers: People, Politics and Environment in the Sundarbans. London, Routledge.
Jost-Robinson CA, Remis MJ (2014). Entangled realms: hunters and hunted in the Dzanga Sanga Dense Forest Reserve (RDS), Central African Republic. Anthropology Quarterly 87: 613-636.
Keil PG (2016). Elephant-human dandi: how humans and elephants move through the fringes of forest and village. In Conflict, Negotiation, and Coexistence: Rethinking Human-Elephant Relations in South Asia (Locke P, Buckingham J, eds.), pp 242-271. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kirksey SE, Helmreich S (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 25: 545-576.
Knight J (2000). Introduction. In Natural Enemies: People-Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective (Knight J, ed.), pp 1-35. London, Routledge.
Knight J (2017). Introduction to part II. In Ethnoprimatology: A Practical Guide to Research at the Human-Nonhuman Primate Interface (Dore KM, Riley EP, Fuentes A, eds.), pp 171-175. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Lee PC (2010). Sharing space: can ethnoprimatology contribute to the survival of nonhuman primates in human-dominated globalized landscapes? American Journal of Primatology 72: 925-931.
Lee PC, Priston NEC (2005). Human attitudes to primates: perceptions of pests, conflict and consequences for primate conservation. In Commensalism and Conflict: The Human-Primate Interface (Paterson JD, Wallis J, eds.), pp 1-23. Winnipeg, Higwell Printing.
Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods and action research. British Medical Journal 337: a567.
Loudon JE, Howells ME, Fuentes A (2006). The importance of integrative anthropology: a preliminary investigation employing primatological and cultural anthropological data collection methods in assessing human-monkey co-existence in Bali, Indonesia. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology 2: 2-12.
Malone N, Selby M, Longo S (2014). Political-ecological dimensions of silvery gibbon conservation efforts. International Journal of Sociology 44: 34-53.
Milton K (2000). Ducks out of water: nature conservation as boundary maintenance. In Natural Enemies (Knight J, ed.), pp 229-246. London, Routledge.
Moon K, Blackman D (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology 28: 1167-1177.
Mullin MH (1999). Mirrors and windows: sociocultural studies of human-animal relationships. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 201-224.
Naughton-Treves L (1996). Uneasy Neighbours: Wildlife and Farmers around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Gainesville, University of Florida.
Nyanganji G, Fowler A, McNamara A, Sommer V (2011). Monkeys and apes as animals and humans: ethnoprimatology in Nigeria's Taraba region. In Primates of Gashaka: Socioecology and Conservation in Nigeria's Biodiversity Hotspot (Sommer V, Ross C, eds.), pp 101-134. New York, Springer.
Ogden LA, Hall B, Tanita K (2013). Animals, plants, people and things: a review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 4: 5-24.
Ohnuki-Tierney E (1987). The Monkey as Mirror. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Ohnuki-Tierney E (1993). Rice as Self: Japanese Identities through Time. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Papworth S, Milner-Gulland EJ, Slocombe K (2013). The natural place to begin: the ethnoprimatology of the Waorani. American Journal of Primatology 75: 1117-1128.
Pratt DG, Macmillan DC, Gordon IJ (2004). Local community attitudes to wildlife utilisation in the changing economic and social context of Mongolia. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 591-613.
Radford L, Alexander S, Waters S (2018). On the rocks: using discourse analysis to examine relationships between Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) and people on Gibraltar. Folia Primatologica 89: 30-44.
Remis MJ, Jost-Robinson CA (2017). Nonhuman primates and “others” in the Dzanga Sangha Reserve: the role of anthropology and multispecies approaches in ethnoprimatology. In Ethnoprimatology: A Practical Guide to Research at the Human-Nonhuman Primate Interface (Dore KM, Riley EP, Fuentes A, eds.), pp 190-205. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Reuter KE, Clarke TA, LaFleur M, Ratsimbazafy J, Holiniaina Kjeldgaard F, Rodriguez L, Schaeffer T, Schaefer MS (2018). Exploring the role of wealth and religion on the ownership of captive lemurs in Madagascar using qualitative and quantitative data. Folia Primatologica 89: 81-96.
Riley EP (2007a). Flexibility in diet and activity patterns of Macaca tonkeana in response to anthropogenic habitat alteration. International Journal of Primatology 28: 107-133.
Riley EP (2007b). The human-macaque interface: conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist 109: 473-484.
Riley EP, Priston NEC (2010). Macaques in farms and folklore: exploring the human-nonhuman primate interface in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology 72: 848-854.
Rust NA, Abrams A, Challender DWS, Chapron G, Ghoddousi A, Glikman JA, Gowan CH, Hughes C, Rastogi A, Said A, Sutton A, Taylor N, Thomas S, Unnikrishnan H, Webber AD, Wordingham G, Hill CM (2017). Quantity does not always mean quality: the importance of qualitative social science in conservation research. Society & Natural Resources 30: 1304-1310.
Setchell JM, Fairet EFM, Shutt K, Waters S, Bell S (2017). Biosocial conservation: integrating biological and ethnographic methods to study human-primate interactions. International Journal of Primatology 35: 401-426.
Shanklin E (1985). Sustenance and symbol: anthropological studies of domesticated animals. Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 375-403.
Siex KS, Struhsaker TT (1999). Colobus monkeys and coconuts: a study of perceived human-wildlife conflicts. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 1009-1020.
Sousa J, Hill CM, Ainslie A (2017). Chimpanzees, sorcery and nature contestation in a protected area in Guinea-Bissau. Social Anthropology 25: 364-379.
Spagnoletti N, Cardoso TCM, Fragaszy D, Izar P (2016). Coexistence between humans and capuchins (Sapajus libidinosus): comparing observational data with farmers' perceptions. International Journal of Primatology 38: 243-262.
Sponsel LE (1997). The human niche in Amazonia: explorations in ethnoprimatology. In New World Primates (Kinzey WG, ed.), pp 111-159. New York, Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
Strum SC (1987). Almost Human: A Journey into the World of Baboons. New York, Random House.
Taylor S (2002). Researching the social: an introduction to ethnographic research. In Ethnographic Research: A Reader (Taylor S, ed.), pp 1-12. London, Sage.
Thạch HM, Le MD, Vũ NB, Panariello A, Sethi G, Sterling EJ, Blair ME (2018). Slow loris trade in Vietnam: exploring diverse knowledge and values. Folia Primatologica 89: 45-62.
Waters S, Bell S, Setchell JM (2018). Understanding human-animal relations in the context of primate conservation: a multispecies ethnographic approach in North Morocco. Folia Primatologica 89: 13-29.
Watson A, Huntington OH (2008). They're here - I can feel them: the epistemic spaces of Indigenous and Western knowledges. Social & Cultural Geography 9: 257-281.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.