Primates are difficult to categorise due to some of the human-like characteristics they possess. Here, we examine the complexities that exist in a commensal relationship between an introduced population of Barbary macaques and local human populations on Gibraltar. In Western culture, much has been done to recognise primates' human characteristics while simultaneously focusing on keeping them at a metaphorical distance. In the context of Gibraltar's Barbary macaques, the anomalous status of primates causes a duality of perception whereby the macaques' position makes them both more frustrating and perceived as more worthy of protection. We examine the language used by Gibraltar residents about the macaques, interpreting statements using discourse analysis to reveal the complexities of people's perceptions of the macaques. Our results indicate that Barbary macaques on Gibraltar occupy a perceptual context of internal conflict in which they are viewed both with pride and a sense of ownership as well as with mistrust and fear. The relationship between people and Barbary macaques on Gibraltar is complex, and while sensitisation programmes and awareness-raising efforts exist, we recommend greater collaboration with residents to prevent the development of more intense negative human-macaque interactions.

Keywords:
Macaques, Ethnography, Conservation, Gibraltar, Discourse analysis
1.
Archer EG (2006). Gibraltar, Identity and Empire. Abingdon, Routledge.
2.
Boggs LP (2000). Community Power, Participation, Conflict and Development Choice: Community Wildlife Conservation in the Okavango Region of Northern Botswana. London, International Institute for Environment and Development.
3.
Burton FD, Sawchuk LA (1974). Demography of Macaca sylvanus of Gibraltar. Primates 15: 271.
4.
Butynski TM, Cortes J, Waters S, Fa J, Hobbelink ME, van Lavieren E, Belbachir F, Cuzin F, de Smet K, Mouna M, de Iongh H, Menard N, Camperio-Ciani A (2008). Macaca sylvanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T12561A3359140.
https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T12561A3359140.en
(accessed August 10, 2016).
5.
Corbey R (2005). The Metaphysics of Apes: Negotiating the Animal-Human Boundary. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
6.
Cortes JE, Finlayson C (1988). The Flowers and Wildlife of Gibraltar. Leatherhead, Ashford, Buchan & Enright.
7.
Cortes J, Shaw E (2006). The Gibraltar macaques: management and future. In The Barbary Macaque, Biology, Management and Conservation (Hodges K, Cortes J, eds.), pp 199-210. Nottingham, University of Nottingham Press.
8.
Dickman AJ (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation 13: 458-466.
9.
Dore KM, Eller AR, Eller JL (2018). Identity construction and symbolic association in farmer-vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) interconnections in St. Kitts. Folia Primatologica 89: 63-80.
10.
Douglas M (1966). Purity and Danger. London, Penguin.
11.
Douglas M (1992). Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London, Routledge,
12.
Drury R, Homewood K, Randall S (2011). Less is more: the potential of qualitative approaches in conservation research. Animal Conservation 14: 18-24.
13.
Fa J (1981). Apes on the Rock. Oryx 16: 73-76.
14.
Fuentes A (2006). Human culture and monkey behavior: assessing the contexts of potential pathogen transmission between macaques and humans. American Journal of Primatology 68: 880-896.
15.
Fuentes A, Gamerl S (2005). Disproportionate participation by age/sex classes in aggressive interactions between long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) and human tourists at Padangtegal monkey forest, Bali, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology 66: 197-204.
16.
Fuentes A, Cortez A, Peterson J (2016). Introduction. In Ethnoprimatology and Conservation: Applying Insights and Developing Practice (Fuentes A, Cortez A, Peterson J, eds.), pp 1-19. Cham, Springer International Publishing.
17.
Fuentes A, O'Neill N, Shaw E, Cortés J (2007a). Humans, monkeys and the Rock: the anthropogenic ecology of the Barbary macaques in the Upper Rock Nature Reserve, Gibraltar. Almoraima: revista de estudios Campo Gibraltareños 35: 87-97.
18.
Fuentes A, Shaw E, Cortes J (2007b). Qualitative assessment of macaque tourist sites in padangtegal, Bali, Indonesia, and the Upper Rock Nature Reserve, Gibraltar. InternationalJournal of Primatology 28: 1143.
19.
Fuentes A, et al. (2007c). Behavioral ecology of two Barbary macaque groups in a highly anthropogenic environment in Gibraltar. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 132: 111.
20.
Gillingham S, Lee PC (2003). People and protected areas: a study of local perceptions of wildlife crop-damage conflict in an area bordering the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oryx 37: 316-325.
21.
Greer KA (2009). Ornithology on “The Rock”: territory, fieldwork, and the body in the Straits of Gibraltar in the mid-nineteenth century. Historical Geography 37: 26-52.
22.
HaHashmonait M (2016). Sociograph.io. https://sociograph.io (accessed July 30, 2016).
23.
Hill CM, Webber AD (2010). Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human-wildlife conflict scenarios. American Journal of Primatology 72: 919-924.
24.
Hough JL (1988). Obstacles to effective management of conflicts between national parks and surrounding human communities in developing countries. Environmental Conservation 15: 129-136.
25.
Hsu MJ, Kao C-C, Agoramoorthy G (2009). Interactions between visitors and Formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis) at Shou-Shan Nature Park, Taiwan. American Journal of Primatology 71: 214-222.
26.
Hymes D (1962). The ethnography of speaking. Anthropology and Human Behavior 13: 11-74.
27.
Knight J (2000). Natural Enemies: People-Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective. Vancouver, Taylor & Francis.
28.
Lee PC, Priston NEC (2005). Perceptions of pests: human attitudes to primates, conflict and consequences for conservation. In Commensalism and Conflict: The Human-Primate Interface (Paterson JD, Wallis J, eds.), pp 1-23. Norman, American Society of Primatologists.
29.
McGinty S (2014). Gibraltar's cheeky monkeys relocated to Scotland. The Scotsman, October 15.
30.
Nash E (2008). Boycott call as Gibraltar decides to cull monkeys. The Independent, April 16.
31.
NIH (2017). Exempt human subjects research. https://humansubjects.nih.gov/sites/hs/public_files/exemption_infographic_v4_hs_internet.pdf (accessed June 20, 2017).
32.
Nyanganji G, Fowler A, McNamara A, Sommer V (2011). Monkeys and apes as animals and humans: ethnoprimatology in Nigeria's Taraba region. In Primates of Gashaka: Socioecology and Conservation in Nigeria's Biodiversity Hotspot (Sommer V, Ross C, eds.), pp 101-134. Cham, Springer International Publishing.
33.
Ohnuki-Tierney E (1987). The Monkey as Mirror: Symbolic Transformations in Japanese History and Ritual. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
34.
Perez CE, Bensusan K (2005). The Upper Rock Nature Reserve. A Management and Action Plan. Gibraltar, Gibraltar Ornithological and Natural History Society.
35.
Priston N, McLennan M (2013). Managing humans, managing macaques: human-macaque conflict in Asia and Africa. In The Macaque Connection (Radhakrishna S, Huffman M, Sinha A, eds.), pp 225-250. New York, Springer.
36.
Putman RJ (1989). Introduction: mammals as pests. In Mammals as Pests (Putman RJ, ed.), pp 1-19. London, Chapman & Hall.
37.
Rodriguez V (2014). Gibraltar. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Edinburgh, Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.
38.
Schiermeier Q (2003). Primatologist rocks Gibraltar by quitting over macaque cull. Nature 246: 111.
39.
Sha JCM, Gumert MD, Lee BPY-H, Jones-Engel L, Chan S, Fuentes A (2009). Macaque-human interactions and the societal perceptions of macaques in Singapore. American Journal of Primatology 71: 825-839.
40.
Sibley D (1995). Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West. London, Routledge.
41.
Singh M, Rao NR (2004). Population dynamics and conservation of commensal bonnet macaques. International Journal of Primatology 25: 847.
42.
Song SH (2000). The Great Pigeon Massacre in a deindustrializing American region. In Natural Enemies (Knight J, ed.), pp 212-228. Abingdon, Routledge.
43.
Southwick CH, Siddiqi MF (1994). Primate commensalism: the rhesus monkey in India. Revue d'écologie 49: 223-231
44.
Tadie D, Fischer A (2013). Hunting, social structure and human-nature relationships in Lower Omo, Ethiopia: people and wildlife at a crossroads. Human Ecology 41: 447-457.
45.
Waters S (2014). Including People in Primate Conservation: A Case Study of Shepherds and Barbary Macaques in Bouhachem Forest, North Morocco. PhD thesis, Anthropology Department, Durham University.
46.
Waters S, Bell S, Setchell J (2018). Understanding human-animal relations in the context of primate conservation: a multispecies approach in North Morocco. Folia Primatologica. 89: 13-29
47.
Webber AD (2017). Commensalism. The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, pp 1-2. Wiley Online Library.
48.
Wheatley B (1999). The Sacred Monkeys of Bali. Long Grove, Waveland Press.
49.
Zimmer M (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 12: 313-325.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.