Primate territorial calls have been used to locate groups in censuses. Daily variations in call rates are a potential source of error in these studies. To obtain more accurate estimations of population density it is necessary to determine how much variation there is in group call rates and to identify the factors that influence them. We present data on the emission of territorial calls by two threatened and endemic titi monkeys in Bolivia: Plecturocebus olallae and P. modestus. We found interspecific differences in daily call rates (52% P. modestus and 33% P. olallae). Groups inhabiting more continuous forests vocalized more frequently than groups in fragmented forests, which might be linked to the higher abundance of groups in less fragmented forests. We found seasonal differences in call rates between species, with more frequent calling in P. modestus during the dry season, while P. olallae called more frequently in the rainy season. The study groups emitted territorial calls mostly from the central zones of their territories, suggesting they do not face intense spatial competition with neighbouring groups. Our results improve the general ecological knowledge on P. olallae and P. modestus, and can also be used to improve population abundance studies and ongoing conservation efforts.

Keywords:
Territorial calls, Plecturocebus modestus, Population density, Abundance estimation, Behavioural ecology, Plecturocebus olallae
1.
Aldrich BC, Molleson L, Nekaris KAI (2008). Vocalizations as a conservation tool: an auditory survey of the Andean titi monkey Callicebus oenanthe Thomas, 1924 (Mammalia: Primates: Pitheciidae) at Tarangue, northern Peru. Contributions to Zoology 77: 1-6.
2.
Altmann J (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227-265.
3.
Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Gonzáles-Perez IM, Garmendia A, Solà M, Estrada A (2013). The relative impact of forest patch and landscape attitudes on black howler monkey populations in fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico. Landscape Ecology 28: 1717-1727.
4.
Brockelman WY, Ali R (1987). Methods of surveying and sampling forest primate populations. In Primate Conservation in the Tropical Rain Forest (Marsh CW, Mittermeier RA, eds.), pp 23-62. New York, Liss.
5.
Brown M (2013). Food and range defence in ground-living primates. Animal Behaviour 85: 807-816.
6.
Byrne H, Rylands AB, Carneiro JC, Lynch-Alfaro JW, Bertuol F, Da Silva MNF, Messias M, Groves CP, Mittermeier RA, Farias I, Hrbek T, Schneider H, Sampaio I, Boubli JP (2016). Phylogenetic relationships of the New World titi monkeys (Callicebus): first appraisal of taxonomy based on molecular evidence. Frontiers in Zoology DOI: 10.1186/s12983-016-0142-4.
7.
Caselli CB, Setz EZ (2007). Seasonality in long calls by titi monkeys (Callicebus nigrifrons) in the Atlantic Forest of southeast Brazil. (Abstract). American Journal of Primatology 69(Suppl 1): 96-97.
8.
Dacier A, De Luna AG, Fernández-Duque E, Di Fiore A (2011). Estimating population density of Amazonian titi monkeys (Callicebus discolor) via playback point counts. Biotropica 43: 135-140.
9.
Di Fiore A (2003). Ranging behaviour and foraging ecology of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. American Journal of Primatology 59: 47-66.
10.
Dytham C (2003). Choosing and Using Statistics, a Biologist's Guide, 2nd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
11.
Felton A, Felton AM, Wallace RB, Gómez H (2006). Identification, distribution and behavioral observations of the titi monkeys Callicebus modestus Lönnberg, 1939 and Callicebus olallae Lönnberg, 1939. Primate Conservation 20: 41-46.
12.
Field AP (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: And Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘n' Roll, 3rd ed. London, Sage.
13.
Gibbons MA, Harcourt AH (2009). Biological correlates of extinction and persistence of primates in small forest fragments: a global analysis. Tropical Conservation Science 2: 388-403.
14.
Hanagarth W (1993). Acerca de la geología de las sabanas de Beni en el norte de Bolivia. La Paz, Instituto de Ecología.
15.
Hershkovitz P (1990). Titis, New World monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary taxonomic review. Fieldiana Zoology, New Series 55: 1-109.
16.
Höing A, Quiten MC, Indrawati YM, Cheyne SM, Waltert M (2013). Line transects and triangulation surveys provide reliable estimates of the density of Kloss' gibbons (Hylobates klossi) on Siberut Island, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 34: 148-156.
17.
Isabirye-Basuta GM, Lwanga JS (2008). Primate populations and their interactions with changing habitats. International Journal of Primatology 29: 35-48.
18.
Jansen M, Schulze A, Werding L, Streit B (2009). Effects of extreme drought in the dry season on an anuran community in the Bolivian Chiquitano region. Salamandra 45: 233-238.
19.
Janson CH, Goldsmith ML (1995). Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks. Behavioral Ecology 6: 326-336.
20.
Kalan AK, Mundry R, Wagner OJJ, Heinicke S, Boesch C, Kühl AS (2015). Towards the automated detection and occupancy estimation of primates using passive acoustic monitoring. Ecological Indicators 54: 217-226.
21.
Kinzey WG (1981). The titi monkeys, genus Callicebus. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates (Coimbra-Filho AF, Mittermeier RA, eds.), vol 1, pp 240-276. Rio de Janeiro, Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.
22.
Lönnberg E (1939). Notes on some members of the genus Callicebus. Arkiv för Zoologi 31: 1-18.
23.
López-Strauss H (2008). Estimación de densidad y composición de grupos de dos especies de primates, Callicebus olallae y Callicebus modestus, endémicos del sudoeste del Departamento del Beni, Bolivia. Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz.
24.
López-Strauss H, Wallace RB (2015). Estimación de densidad de dos primates endémicos bolivianos, Callicebus olallae y Callicebus modestus. Mastozoología Neotropical 22: 23-34.
25.
Martinez J (2014). Behaviour and Ranging Patterns of the Endangered and Endemic Bolivian Titi Monkeys Callicebus olallae and Callicebus modestus. MSc thesis, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
26.
Martinez J, Wallace RB (2007). Further notes on the distribution of endemic Bolivian titi monkeys, Callicebus modestus and Callicebus olallae. Neotropical Primates 14: 47-54.
27.
Martinez J, Wallace RB (2010). Pitheciidae. In Distribución, Ecología y Conservación de los Mamíferos Medianos y Grandes de Bolivia (Wallace RB, Gómez H, Porcel ZR, Rumiz DI, eds.), pp 305-330. Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Centro de Ecología Difusión Simón I. Patiño.
28.
Martinez J, Wallace RB (2013). New information about the distribution of Callicebus in Bolivia. Ecología en Bolivia 48: 57-62.
29.
Méndez-Cárdenas MG, Zimmermann E (2009). Duetting - a mechanism to strengthen pair bonds in a dispersed pair-living primate (Lepilemur edwardsi)?American Journal of Physical Anthropology 139: 523-532.
30.
Mitani JC, Watts DP (2005). Correlates on territorial boundary patrol behaviour in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 70: 1079-1086.
31.
Müller AE, Anzenberger G (2002). Duetting in the titi monkey Callicebus cupreus: structure, pair specificity and development of duets. Folia Primatologica 73: 104-115.
32.
Nijman V, Menken SBJ (2005). Assessment of census techniques for estimating density and biomass of gibbons (Primates: Hylobatidae). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 53: 201-211.
33.
Oliveira DAG, Ades C (2004). Long-distance calls in Neotropical primates. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 76: 393-398.
34.
Pyritz LW, Büntge ABS, Herzog SK, Kessler M (2010). Effects of habitat structure and fragmentation on diversity and abundance of primates in tropical deciduous forests in Bolivia. International Journal of Primatology 31: 796-812.
35.
Raven P, Johnson GB (2002). Biology, 6th ed. Boston, McGraw-Hill.
36.
Roberts SC (2012). On the relationship between scent-marking and territoriality in callitrichid primates. International Journal of Primatology 33: 749-761.
37.
Robinson JF, Wright PC, Kinzey WG (1987). Monogamous cebids and their relatives: intergroup calls and spacing. In Primate Societies (Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT, eds.), pp 44-53. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
38.
Robinson JG (1979). Vocal regulation of the use of space by groups of titi monkeys Callicebus moloch. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5: 1-15.
39.
Setz EZF, Pinto LP, Bowler M, Barnett AA, Vié JC, Boubli JP, Norconk MA (2013). Pitheciins: use of time and space. In Evolutionary Biology and Conservation of Titis, Sakis and Uacaris (Veiga LM, Barnett AA, Ferrari SF, Norconk MA, eds.), pp 78-83. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
40.
Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill.
41.
Van Kuijk SM, García-Suikkanen C, Tello-Alvarado JC, Vermeer J, Hill CM (2015). Estimating population density of the San Martin titi monkey (Callicebus oenanthe) in Peru using vocalisations. Folia Primatologica 86: 525-533.
42.
van Schaik CP, Pfannes KR (2005). Tropical climates and phenology: a primate perspective. In Seasonality in Primates, Studies of Living and Extinct Human and Non-Human Primates (Brockman DK, van Schaik CP, eds.), pp 23-54. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
43.
Veiga LM, Wallace RB, Martinez J (2008a). Callicebus modestus. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed November 25, 2013).
44.
Veiga LM, Wallace RB, Martinez J (2008b). Callicebus olallae. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed November 25, 2013).
45.
Wallace RB (2005). Seasonal variations in diet and foraging behavior of Ateles chamek in a Southern Amazonian tropical forest. International Journal of Primatology 26: 1053-1075.
46.
Wallace RB (2006). Towing the party line: territoriality, risky boundaries and male group size in spider monkey fission-fusion societies. American Journal of Primatology 70: 271-281.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.