Abstract
Many primate species currently subsist in fragmented and anthropogenically disturbed habitats. Different threats arise depending on the species' life history strategy, dietary requirements and habitat preference. Additionally, anthropogenic disturbance is far from uniform and may affect individual forest fragments in a single landscape in differing ways. We studied the effects of fragmentation on three species of diurnal primate, Cebus albifrons, Alouatta seniculus and Ateles hybridus, in Magdalena Valley, Colombia. We tested the assumption that generalist species are more resilient than specialist species to habitat degradation by examining the fragments' vegetation and spatial structure and how these affected primate presence and abundance patterns. We found C. albifrons, a generalist, to be the most abundant species in 9 of 10 forest fragments, regardless of the level of habitat disturbance. A. hybridus, a large-bodied primate with a specialist diet, was either absent or low in abundance in fragments that had experienced recent disturbances and was found only in higher-quality fragments, regardless of the fragment size. A. seniculus, a species considered to have a highly flexible diet and the ability to survive in degraded habitat, was found in intermediate abundances between those of Cebus spp. and Ateles spp., and was more frequently found in high-quality fragments.
Journal Section:
Editor's choice
References
1.
Abondano LA, Link A (2012). The social behavior of brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus) in a fragmented forest in Colombia. International Journal of Primatology 33: 769-783.
2.
Anapol F, Lee S (1994). Morphological adaptation to diet in platyrrhine primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 94: 239-261.
[PubMed]
3.
Andrén H (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355-366.
4.
Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Mandujano S (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of habitat fragmentation from the primates' perspective. International Journal of Primatology 30: 497-514.
5.
Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Cuesta-del Moral E, Mandujano S, Chapman CA, Reyna-Hurtado R, Fahrig L (2013). Assessing habitat fragmentation effects on primates: the importance of evaluating questions at the correct scale. In Primates in Fragments: Ecology and Conservation (Marsh LK, Chapman CA, eds.), pp 13-28. New York, Springer.
6.
Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Mandujano S, Benítez-Malvido J, Cuende-Fanton C (2007). The influence of large tree density on howler monkey (Alouatta palliata mexicana) presence in very small rain forest fragments. Biotropica 39: 760-766.
7.
Asensio N, Korstjens AH, Schaffner CM, Aureli F (2008). Intragroup aggression, fission-fusion dynamics and feeding competition in spider monkeys. Behaviour 145: 983-1001.
8.
Barbisan-Fortes V, Bicca-Marques JC, Urbani B, Fernández VA, da Silva Pereira T (2014). Ranging behavior and spatial cognition of howler monkeys. In Howler Monkeys: Behavior, Ecology and Conservation (Kowalewski M, Garber PA, Cortés-Ortiz L, Urbani B, Youlatos D, eds.), pp 219-255. New York, Springer.
9.
Benchimol M, Peres CA (2014). Predicting primate local extinctions with ‘real-world' forest fragments: a pan-Neotropical analysis. American Journal of Primatology 76: 289-302.
[PubMed]
10.
Bender DJ, Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2003). Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes. Landscape Ecology 18: 17-39.
11.
Bernstein IS, Balcaen P, Dresdale L, Gouzoules H, Kavanagh M, Patterson T, Neyman-Warner P (1976). Differential effects of forest degradation on primate populations. Primates 17: 401-411.
12.
Bicca-Marques JC (2003). How do howler monkeys cope with habitat fragmentation? In Primates in Fragments: Ecology and Conservation (Marsh LK, ed.), pp 283-303. New York, Springer.
13.
Boyle SA, Smith AT (2010). Behavioral modifications in northern bearded saki monkeys (Chiropotes satanas chiropotes) in forest fragments of central Amazonia. Primates 51: 43-51.
[PubMed]
14.
Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001). Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
15.
Buckland ST, Plumptre AJ, Thomas L, Rexstad EA (2010). Design and analysis of line transect surveys for primates. International Journal of Primatology 31: 833-847.
16.
Buckley JS (1983). The Feeding Behavior, Social Behavior, and Ecology of the White-Faced Monkey, Cebus capucinus, at Trujillo, Northern Honduras, Central America. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin (University Microfilms International).
17.
Chapman CA, Peres CA (2001). Primate conservation in the new millennium: the role of scientists. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues 10: 16-33.
18.
Chapman CA, Wrangham R, Hunt K, Gardner L (1992). Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24: 527-531.
19.
Cowlishaw G, Dunbar R (2000). Primate Conservation Biology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
20.
Cristóbal-Azkarate J, Arroyo-Rodríguez V (2007). Diet and activity pattern of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico: effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. American Journal of Primatology 69: 1013-1029.
[PubMed]
21.
Crockett CM, Rudran R (1987). Red howler monkey birth data. II. Interannual, habitat, and sex comparisons. American Journal of Primatology 13: 369-384.
22.
Crockett CM, Sekulic R (1982). Gestation length in red howler monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 3: 291-294.
23.
Defler TR (1979). On the ecology and behavior of Cebus albifrons in eastern Columbia. I. Ecology. Primates 20: 475-490.
24.
De Freitas CH, Setz EZF, Araújo ARB, Gobbi N (2008). Agricultural crops in the diet of bearded capuchin monkeys, Cebus libidinosus Spix (Primates: Cebidae), in forest fragments in southeast Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 25: 32-39.
25.
Dew JL (2005). Foraging, food choice, and food processing by sympatric ripe-fruit specialists: Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii and Ateles belzebuth belzebuth. International Journal of Primatology 26: 1107-1135.
26.
Di Fiore A, Campbell CJ (2007). The atelines: variation in ecology, behavior, and social organization. In Primates in Perspective (Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, Mackinnon KC, Panger M, Beader SK, eds.), pp 155-185. New York, Oxford University Press.
27.
Donati G, Kesch K, Ndremifidy K, Schmidt SL, Ramanamanjato JB, Borgognini-Tarli SM, Ganzhorn JU (2011). Better few than hungry: flexible feeding ecology of collared lemurs Eulemur collaris in littoral forest fragments. PLoS One 6: e19807.
[PubMed]
28.
Eppley TM, Verjans E, Donati G (2011). Coping with low-quality diets: a first account of the feeding ecology of the southern gentle lemur, Hapalemur meridionalis, in the Mandena littoral forest, southeast Madagascar. Primates 52: 7-13.
[PubMed]
29.
Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (1996). Tropical rain forest fragmentation and wild populations of primates at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. International Journal of Primatology 17: 759-783.
30.
Estrada R (1999). Feeding and general activity patterns of a howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) troop living in a forest fragment at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology 48: 167-183.
[PubMed]
31.
Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006). Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biology Review 81: 117-142.
[PubMed]
32.
Fahrig L (1999). Forest loss and fragmentation: which has the greater effect on persistence of forest-dwelling animals? In ForestFragmentation: Wildlife and Management Implications (Rochelle L, Lehman L, eds.), pp 87-95. Leiden, Koninklijke Brill NV.
33.
Fedigan LM, Rose LM (1995). Interbirth interval variation in three sympatric species of neotropical monkey. American Journal of Primatology 37: 9-24.
34.
Fedigan LM, Carnegie SD, Jack KM (2008). Predictors of reproductive success in female white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus).American Journal of Physical Anthropology 137: 82-90.
[PubMed]
35.
Fleagle JG (2013). Primate Adaptation and Evolution, 3rd ed. San Diego, Academic Press.
36.
Ganzhorn JU, Rakotondranary SJ, Rakotondranary YR (2011). Habitat description and phenology. In Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide (Setchell JM, Curtis DJ, eds.), pp 40-56. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
37.
Garber PA, Estrada A, Pavelka MS (2006). New perspectives in the study of Mesoamerican primates: concluding comments and conservation priorities. In New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates: Distribution, Ecology, Behavior, and Conservation (Estrada A, Garber PA, Pavelka MSM, Luecke L, eds.), pp 563-584. New York, Springer.
38.
Gillespie TR, Chapman CA (2008). Forest fragmentation, the decline of an endangered primate, and changes in host-parasite interactions relative to an unfragmented forest. American Journal of Primatology 70: 222-230.
[PubMed]
39.
Goldberg TL, Gillespie TR, Rwego IB, Esoff EL, Chapman CA (2008). Forest fragmentation as cause of bacterial transmission among nonhuman primates, humans and livestock, Uganda. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14: 1375-1384.
[PubMed]
40.
Goodenough AE, Goodenough AS (2012). Development of a rapid and precise method of digital image analysis to quantify canopy density and structural complexity. ISRN Ecology 2012: 1-11.
41.
Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Euskirchen NIES, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Eug E, Roberts DAR, Jaiteh MS, Esseen P (2005). Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19: 768-782.
42.
Hill J, Curran PJ (2004). Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. Journal of Biogeography 30: 1391-1403.
43.
Irwin MT (2008a). Feeding ecology of diademed sifakas (Propithecus diadema) in forest fragments and continuous forest. International Journal of Primatology 29: 95-115.
44.
Irwin MT (2008b). Diademed sifaka (Propithecus diadema) ranging and habitat use in continuous and fragmented forest: higher density but lower viability in fragments? Biotropica 40: 231-240.
45.
IUCN (2014). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed February 18, 2015).
46.
Janson CH (1998). Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Animal Behaviour 55: 1229-1243.
[PubMed]
47.
Knapp LA (2013). Molecular genetic tools for evaluating the consequences of habitat fragmentation. In Primates in Fragments: Complexity and Resilience (Marsh LK, ed.), pp 389-398. New York, Springer.
48.
Link A, de Luna AG, Alfonso F, Giraldo-Beltran P, Ramirez F (2010). Initial effects of fragmentation on the density of three neotropical primate species in two lowland forests of Colombia. Endangered Species Research 13: 41-50.
49.
Link A, Galvis N, Marquez M, Guerrero J, Solano C, Stevenson PR (2012). Diet of the critically endangered brown spider monkey (Ateles hybridus) in an inter-Andean lowland rainforest in Colombia. American Journal of Primatology 74: 1097-1105.
[PubMed]
50.
Marsh LK, Chapman CA (2013). Primates in Fragments: Complexity and Resilience. New York, Springer.
51.
Marshall AJ, Boyko CM, Feilen KL, Boyko RH, Leighton M (2009). Defining fallback foods and assessing their importance in primate ecology and evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 140: 603-614.
[PubMed]
52.
Marshall AR, Lovett JC, White PCL (2008). Selection of line-transect methods for estimating the density of group-living animals: lessons from the primates. American Journal of Primatology70: 452-462.
[PubMed]
53.
Matthews LJ (2009). Activity patterns, home range size, and intergroup encounters in Cebus albifrons support existing models of capuchin socioecology. International Journal of Primatology 30: 709-728.
54.
Mbora DNM, Meikle DB (2004). Forest fragmentation and the distribution, abundance and conservation of the Tana River red colobus (Protocolobus rufomitratus).Biological Conservation 118: 67-77.
55.
Michalski F, Peres CA (2005). Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscape of southern Amazonia. Biological Conservation 124: 383-396.
56.
Miller LE (2002). The role of group size in predator sensitive foraging decisions in wedge-capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus olivaceus). In Eat or Be Eaten: Predator Sensitive Foraging among Primates (Miller L, ed.), pp 95-106. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
57.
Milton K (1980). The Foraging Strategy of Howler Monkeys: A Study in Primate Economics. New York, Columbia University Press.
58.
Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB, Taylor LA, Chiozza F, Williamson EA, Wallis J, Schwitzer C (eds.) (2012). Primates in Peril: The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates 2012-2014. Bristol, IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation.
59.
Palacios E, Rodriguez A (2001). Ranging pattern and use of space in a group of red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in a southeastern Colombian rainforest. American Journal of Primatology 55: 233-251.
[PubMed]
60.
Panger MA, Perry S, Rose L, Gros-Lewis J, Vogel E, Mackinnon K, Baker M (2002). Cross-site differences in foraging behavior of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus).American Journal of Physical Anthropology 119: 52-66.
[PubMed]
61.
Peres CA (1997). Effects of habitat quality and hunting pressure on arboreal folivore densities in Neotropical forests: A case study of howler monkeys (Alouatta spp.). Folia Primatologia 68: 199-222.
62.
Peres CA (1999). General guidelines for standardizing line-transect surveys of tropical forest primates. Neotropical Primates 7: 11-16.
63.
Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM (2000). Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences 267: 1947-1952.
[PubMed]
64.
Ramos-Fernández G, Ayala-Orozco B (2002). Population size and habitat use of spider monkeys at Punta Laguna, Mexico. In Primates in Fragments: Ecology and Conservation (Marsh LK, ed.), pp 191-210. New York, Plenum-Kluwer.
65.
Ramos-Fernández G, Wallace RB (2008). Spider monkeys conservation in the twenty-first century: recognizing risks and opportunities. In Spider Monkeys: The Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution of the Genus Ateles (Campbell CJ, ed.), pp 351-376. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
66.
Rangel-Negrín A, Alfaro JL, Valdez RA, Romano MC, Serio-Silva JC (2009). Stress in Yucatan spider monkeys: effects of environmental conditions on fecal cortisol levels in wild and captive populations. Animal Conservation 12: 496-502.
67.
Rimbach R, Link A, Heistermann M, Gómez-Posada C, Galvis N, Heymann EW (2013). Effects of logging, hunting, and forest fragment size on physiological stress levels of two sympatric ateline primates in Colombia. Conservation Physiology 1: 1-11.
68.
Rimbach R, Pardo-Martinez A, Montes-Rojas A, Di Fiore A, Link A (2012). Interspecific infanticide and infant-directed aggression by spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus) in a fragmented forest in Colombia. American Journal of Primatology 8: 1-8.
[PubMed]
69.
Rosin C, Swamy V (2013). Variable density responses of primate communities to hunting pressure in a western Amazonian river basin. Neotropical Primates 20: 25-31.
70.
Ross CA (1989). Life-History Strategies of Primates. Doctoral dissertation, University of London.
71.
Rovero F, Struhsaker TT, Marshall AR, Rinne TA, Pedersen UB, Butynski TM, Mtui AS (2006). Abundance of diurnal primates in Mwanihana Forest, Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania: a multi-observer comparison of line-transect data. International Journal of Primatology 27: 675-697.
72.
Russo GA, Young JW (2011). Tail growth tracks the ontogeny of prehensile tail use in capuchin monkeys (Cebus albifrons and C. apella).American Journal of Physical Anthropology 146: 465-473.
[PubMed]
73.
Sabbatini G, Stammati M, Tavares MCH, Giuliani MV, Visalberghi E (2006). Interactions between humans and capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) in the Parque Nacional de Brasília, Brazil. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97: 272-283.
74.
Schwarzkopf L, Rylands AB (1989). Primate species richness in relation to habitat structure in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Biological Conservation 48: 1-12.
75.
Schwitzer C, Glatt L, Nekaris KAI, Ganzhorn JU (2011). Responses of animals to habitat alteration: an overview focussing on primates. Endangered Species Research 14: 31-38.
76.
Shimooka Y, Campbell CJ, Di Fiore A, Felton AM, Izawa K, Link A, Nishimura A, Ramos-Fernández G, Wallace R (2008). Demography and group composition of Ateles. In Spider Monkeys: Behavior Ecology and Evolution of the Genus Ateles (Campbell C, ed.), pp 329-348. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
77.
Skorupa JP (1988). The Effect of Selective Timber Harvesting on Rain-Forest Primates in Kibale Forest, Uganda. PhD dissertation, University of California at Davis.
78.
Strier KB (1992). Atelinae adaptations: behavioral strategies and ecological constraints. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 88: 515-524.
[PubMed]
79.
Symington MM (1988). Demography, ranging patterns, and activity budgets of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus chamek) in the Manu National Park, Peru. American Journal of Primatology 15: 45-67.
80.
Symington MM (2000). Sex ratio and maternal rank in wild spider monkeys: when daughters disperse. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20: 421-425.
81.
Terborgh J (1983). Ecology of mixed troops. In Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology (Terborgh J, ed.), pp 155-176. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
82.
Thomas L, Lake JL, Strindberg S, Marques FFC, Borchers DL, Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Hedley SL, Pollard JH (2006). Distance 4.0. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment. St Andrews, University of St Andrews.
83.
Tischendorf L, Bender DJ, Fahrig L (2003). Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs generalist dispersers. Landscape Ecology 18: 41-50.
84.
Tutin CE (1999). Fragmented living: behavioural ecology of primates in a forest fragment in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon. Primates 40: 249-265.
[PubMed]
85.
Urbani B, Morales AL, Link A, Stevenson P (2008). Ateles hybridus. In 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org.
86.
Vick L (2008). Immaturity in spider monkeys: a risky business. In Spider Monkeys: Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Genus Ateles (Campbell CJ, ed.), pp 288-328. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
87.
Wieczkowski J (2004). Ecological correlates of abundance in the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus).American Journal of Primatology 63: 125-138.
[PubMed]
88.
Youlatos D (1993). Passages within a discontinuous canopy: bridging in the red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus).Folia Primatologica 61: 144-147.
[PubMed]
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2016
You do not currently have access to this content.
