Abstract
Videos, memes and images of pet slow lorises have become increasingly popular on the Internet. Although some video sites allow viewers to tag material as ‘animal cruelty', no site has yet acknowledged the presence of cruelty in slow loris videos. We examined 100 online videos to assess whether they violated the ‘five freedoms' of animal welfare and whether presence or absence of these conditions contributed to the number of thumbs up and views received by the videos. We found that all 100 videos showed at least 1 condition known as negative for lorises, indicating absence of the necessary freedom; 4% showed only 1 condition, but in nearly one third (31.3%) all 5 chosen criteria were present, including human contact (57%), daylight (87%), signs of stress/ill health (53%), unnatural environment (91%) and isolation from conspecifics (77%). The public were more likely to like videos where a slow loris was kept in the light or displayed signs of stress. Recent work on primates has shown that imagery of primates in a human context can cause viewers to perceive them as less threatened. Prevalence of a positive public opinion of such videos is a real threat towards awareness of the conservation crisis faced by slow lorises.
Journal Section:
Editor's choice
References
1.
Aaker J, Smith A (2010). The Dragonfly Effect: Quick, Effective, and Powerful Ways to Use Social Media to Drive Social Change. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
2.
Agnew R (1998). The causes of animal abuse: a social psychological analysis. Theoretical Criminology 2: 177-210.
3.
Alexa Traffic Rank (2014). List of most popular web sites. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_popular_websites (accessed June 25, 2014).
4.
Ankel-Simmons F (2007). An Introduction to Primate Anatomy, 3rd ed. London, Elsevier.
5.
Bellanca RU, Crockett CM (2002). Factors predicting increased incidence of abnormal behaviour in male pigtailed macaques. American Journal of Primatology 58: 57-69.
[PubMed]
6.
Birke L (2002). Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orangutans. Animal Welfare 11: 189-202.
7.
Bloomsmith MA, Baker KC, Ross SR, Pazola KA (2002). The behavioural effects of early rearing experience on captive chimpanzee behavioural development: the juvenile years. American Journal of Primatology 57(Suppl. 1): 54-55.
8.
Broom DM (2010). Animal welfare: an aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 37: 83-88.
[PubMed]
9.
Broom DM, Johnson KG (1993). Stress and Animal Welfare (Animal Behaviour Series). London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10.
Cabana F, Plowman A (2014). Pygmy slow loris Nycticebus pygmaeus - natural diet replication in captivity. Endangered Species Research 23: 197-204.
11.
Ceballos-Mago A, Chivers DJ (2010). Local knowledge and perceptions of pet primates and wild Margarita capuchins on Isla de Margarita and Isla de Coche in Venezuela. Endangered Species Research 13: 63-72.
12.
Cha M, Kwak H, Rodriguez P, Ahn YY, Moon S (2007). I Tube, You Tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system. Proceedings of ACM Internet Measurement Conference, San Diego, pp 1-14.
13.
Cheng X, Dale C, Liu J (2007). Understanding the characteristics of internet short video sharing: YouTube as a case study. Technical report arXiv: 0707.3670v [es.NI]. Ithaca, Cornell University.
14.
Clauss M, Kaiser T, Hummel J (2008). The morphological adaptations of browsing and grazing mammals. In The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing (Gordon IJ, Prins HHT, eds.), pp 47-88. Berlin, Springer.
15.
Cowlishaw G, Dunbar R (2000). Primate Conservation Biology. London, University of Chicago Press.
16.
Crissey SD, Pribyl LS (1997): Utilizing wild foraging ecology information to provide captive primates with an appropriate diet. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 56: 1083-1094.
[PubMed]
17.
Davis N, Schaffner CM, Smith TE (2005). Evidence that zoo visitors influence HPA activity in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi rufiventris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90: 131-141.
18.
Drews C (2003). The state of wild animals in the minds and households of a neotropical society: the Costa Rican case study. In The State of the Animals (Salem DJ, Rowan AN, eds.), vol II, pp 193-205. Washington, Human Society Press.
19.
Duarte-Quiroga A, Estrada A (2003). Primates as pets in Mexico City: an assessment of the species involved, source of origin, and general aspects of treatment. American Journal of Primatology 61: 53-60.
[PubMed]
20.
Engebretson M (2006). The welfare and suitability of parrots as companion animals: a review. Animal Welfare 15: 263-276.
21.
Field A (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. New York, Sage Press.
22.
Fitch-Snyder H, Schulze H (2001). Management of Lorises in Captivity: A Husbandry Manual for Asian Lorisines (Nycticebus and Loris spp.). San Diego, Zoological Society of San Diego, Centre for Reproduction of Endangered Species (CRES).
23.
Fitch-Snyder H, Schulze H, Streicher U (2008). Enclosure design for captive slow and pygmy lorises. In Primates of the Oriental Night (Shekelle M, Maryanto I, Groves C, Schulze H, Fitch-Snyder H, eds.), pp 123-135. Jakarta, LIPI.
24.
Fraser D (2009). Animal behaviour, animal welfare and the scientific study of affect. AppliedAnimal Behaviour Science 118: 108-117.
25.
Freeman B, Chapman S (2007). Is ʼYouTubeʼ telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco Control 16: 207-210.
[PubMed]
26.
Fuller G, Lukas KE, Kuhar C, Dennis PM (2014). A retrospective review of mortality in lorises and pottos in North American zoos, 1980-2010. Endangered Species Research 23: 205-217
27.
Fuller G, Kuhar CW, Dennis PM, Lukas KE (2013). A survey of husbandry practices for lorisid primates in North American zoos and related facilities. Zoo Biology 32: 88-100.
[PubMed]
28.
Goldman AS (2002). Evolution of the mammary gland defense system and the ontogeny of the immune system. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 7: 277-289.
[PubMed]
29.
Hevesi R (2005). Welfare and health implications for primates kept as pets. In Born to Be Wild: Primates Are Not Pets (International Fund for Animal Welfare, eds.), pp 18-29. London, IFAW.
30.
Holbert RL, Kwak N, Shah DV (2003). Environmental concern, patterns of television viewing, and pro-environmental behaviours: integrating models of media consumption and effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 47: 177-196.
31.
Honess PE, Marin CM (2006). Enrichment and aggression in primates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 30: 413-436.
[PubMed]
32.
Hosey GR (2000). Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect? AnimalWelfare 9: 343-357.
33.
Hughes P (2001). Animals, values and tourism - structural shifts in UK dolphin tourism provision. Tourism Management 22: 321-329.
34.
Irwin PG (2003). A strategic review of international animal protection. In The State of the Animals (Salem DJ, Rowan AN, eds.), vol II, pp 1-8. Washington, Humane Society Press.
35.
Jones A, Sinclair W (2008). Losing ‘Nemo': bleaching and collection appear to reduce inshore populations of anemonefishes. Journal of Fish Biology 73: 753-761.
36.
Keum H, Devanathan N, Deshpande S, Nelson MR, Shah DV (2004). The citizen-consumer: media effects at the intersection of consumer and civic culture. Political Communication 21: 369-391.
37.
Kim K, Paek HJ, Lynn J (2010). A content analysis of smoking fetish videos on YouTube: regulatory implications for tobacco control. Health Communication 25: 97-106.
[PubMed]
38.
Kuhar CW, Bettinger TL, Sironen AL, Shaw JH, Lasley BL (2003). Factors affecting reproduction in zoo-housed Geoffroy's tamarins (Saguinus geoffroyi). Zoo Biology 22: 545-559.
39.
Leighty KA, Valuska AJ, Grand AP, Bettinger TL, Mellen JD, Ross SR, Boyle P, Ogden JJ (2015). Impact of visual context on public perceptions of non-human primate performers. PLoS One 10: e0118487.
[PubMed]
40.
Lewis MH, Gluck JP, Petitto JM, Hensley LL, Ozer H (2000). Early social deprivation in nonhuman primates: long-term effects on survival and cell-mediated immunity. BiologicalPsychiatry 47: 119-126.
[PubMed]
41.
Li PJ (2006). The evolving animal rights and welfare debate in China: political and social impact analysis. In Animals, Ethics and Trade: The Challenge of Animal Sentience (Turner J, D'Silva J, eds.), pp 111-128. London, Earthscan.
42.
Lubach GR, Coe CL (2006). Immunological consequences of nursery rearing. In Nursery Rearing of Non-Human Primates in the 21st Century (Sackett GP, Ruppenthal GC, Elias K, eds.), pp 135-168. New York, Springer.
43.
Lutz C, Well A, Novak M (2003). Stereotypic and self-injurious behaviour in rhesus macaques: a survey and retrospective analysis of environment and early experience. American Journal of Primatology 60: 1-15.
[PubMed]
44.
Madden A, Ruthven I, McMenemy D (2013). A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments. Journal of Documentation 69: 693-714.
45.
Malamud R (2010). Animals on film: the ethics of the human gaze. Spring 83: 1-26.
46.
Mallapur A, Choudhury BC (2003). Behavioural abnormalities in captive nonhuman primates. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 275-284.
[PubMed]
47.
Mankoff J, Matthews D, Fussell SR, Johnson M (2007). Leveraging social networks to motivate individuals to reduce their ecological footprints. Human Computer Interaction Institute, paper 47.
48.
Maria GA (2006). Public perceptions of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livestock Science 103: 250-256.
49.
Mason GJ (1991). Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015-1037.
50.
Meder A (1989). Effects of hand-rearing on the behavioural development of infant and juvenile gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla).Developmental Psychobiology 22: 357-376.
[PubMed]
51.
Morgan KN, Tromborg CT (2007). Sources of stress in captivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 262-302.
52.
Nekaris KAI, Bearder SK (2011). The lorisiform primates of Asia and mainland Africa: diversity shrouded in darkness. In Primates in Perspective (Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Bearder SK, Stumpf RM, eds.), 2nd ed., pp 34-54. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
53.
Nekaris KAI, Campbell N (2012). Media attention promotes conservation of threatened Asian slow lorises. Oryx 46: 169-170.
54.
Nekaris KAI, Nijman V (2007). CITES proposal highlights rarity of Asian nocturnal primates (Lorisidae: Nycticebus). Folia Primatologica 78: 211-214.
[PubMed]
55.
Nekaris KAI, Starr C (2015). Conservation and ecology of the neglected slow loris: priorities and prospects. Endangered Species Research 28: 87-95.
56.
Nekaris KAI, Campbell N, Coggins TC, Rode EJ, Nijman V (2013a). Tickled to death: analysing public perception of ‘cute' videos of threatened species (slow loris - Nycticebus spp.) on web 2.0 sites. PLoS One 8: e69215.
[PubMed]
57.
Nekaris KAI, Moore RS, Rode EJ, Fry BG (2013b). Mad, bad and dangerous to know: the biochemistry, ecology and evolution of slow loris venom. Journal of Venomous Animal Toxins Including Tropical Diseases 19: 21.
[PubMed]
58.
Paek HJ, Kim K, Hove T (2010). Content analysis of antismoking videos on YouTube: message sensation value, message appeals, and their relationships with viewer responses. Health Education Research 25: 1085-1099.
[PubMed]
59.
Pearson E, Dorrian J, Litchfield C (2011). Harnessing visual media in environmental education: increasing knowledge of orangutan conservation issues and facilitating sustainable behaviour through video presentations. Environmental Education Research 17: 751-767.
60.
Pirovino M, Heistermann M, Zimmerman N, Zingg R, Clauss M, Codron D, Steinmetz HW (2011). Fecal glucocorticoid measurements and their relation to rearing, behaviour, and environmental factors in the population of pileated gibbons (Hylobates pileatus) held in European Zoos. International Journal of Primatology 32: 1161-1178.
61.
Porton I, Niebruegge K (2006). The changing role of hand rearing in zoo-based primate breeding programs. In Nursery Rearing of Non-Human Primates in the 21st Century (Sackett GP, Ruppenthal GC, Elias K, eds.), pp 21-31. New York, Springer.
62.
Powell L (2010). Meerkat misery: thanks to that TV ad, they're now a must-have pet… but beneath the cute image lies shocking cruelty. MailOnline. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1281692/Meerkat-misery-Thanks-TV-ad-theyre-pet-cute-image-lies-shocking-cruelty.html (accessed June 18, 2014).
63.
Reade LS, Waran NK (1996). The modern zoo: how do people perceive zoo animals? AppliedAnimal Behaviour Science 47: 109-118.
64.
Reinhardt V (2004). Common husbandry-related variables in biomedical research with animals. Laboratory Animals 38: 213-235.
[PubMed]
65.
Reiter RJ (1991). Neuroendocrine effects of light. International Journal of Biometeorology 35: 169-175.
[PubMed]
66.
Rode-Margono EJ, Nijman V, Wirdateti, Nekaris KAI (2014). Ethology of the critically endangered Javan slow loris Nycticebus javanicus E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire in West Java. Asian Primates 4: 27-41.
67.
Ross SR, Bloomsmith MA, Lambeth SP (2003). Early rearing and the social development of captive chimpanzees with social partners (abstract). 26th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Primatologists, University of Calgary.
68.
Ross SR, Lukas KE, Lonsdorf EV, Stoinski TS, Hare B, Shumaker R, Goodall J (2008). Inappropriate use and portrayal of chimpanzees. Science 319: 1487.
[PubMed]
69.
Ross SR, Vreeman VM, Lonsdorf EV (2011). Specific image characteristics influence attitudes about chimpanzee conservation and use as pets. PLoS One 6: e22050.
[PubMed]
70.
Schroepfer KK, Rosati AG, Chartrand T, Hare B (2011). Use of ‘entertainment' chimpanzees in commercials distorts public perception regarding their conservation status. PLoS One 6: e26048.
[PubMed]
71.
Schuppli CA, Fraser D (2000). A framework for assessing the suitability of different species as companion animals. Animal Welfare 9: 359-372.
72.
Shifman L (2012). An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media and Society 14: 187-203.
73.
Smith L, Broad S (2008). Comparing zoos and the media as conservation educators. Visitor Studies 11: 16-25.
74.
Sodaro C, Weber B (2000). Hand-rearing and early reintroduction of a Sumatran orang-utan, Pongopygmaeus abelii. International Zoo Yearbook 37: 374-380.
75.
Sollund R (2011). Expressions of speciesism: the effects of keeping companion animals on animal abuse, animal trafficking and species decline. Crime, Law and Social Change 55: 437-451.
76.
Soulsbury CD, Iossa G, Kennel S, Harris S (2009). The welfare and suitability of primates kept as pets. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 12: 1-20.
[PubMed]
77.
Starr C, Nekaris KAI (2013). Obligate exudativory characterizes the diet of the pygmy slow loris Nycticebus pygmaeus. American Journal of Primatology 75: 1054-1061.
[PubMed]
78.
Streicher U, Schulze H, Fitch-Snyder H (2008). Confiscations, rehabilitation and placement of slow lorises: recommendations to improve the handling of confiscated slow lorises Nycticebus coucang. In Primates of the Oriental Night (Shekelle M, Maryanto I, Groves C, Schulze H, Fitch-Snyder H, eds.), pp 137-145. Jakarta, LIPI.
79.
Thompson KV, Baker AJ, Baker AM (2010). Parental care and behavioural development in captive mammals. In Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management (Kleinman DG, Thompson KV, Baer CK, eds.), pp 367-385. London, University of Chicago Press.
80.
Travis B (2014). The top 10 internet superstar pets. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/11059081/The-top-10-internet-superstar-pets.html.
81.
Van Nijboer J, Clauss M, Van de Put K, Van der Kuilen J, Woutersee H, Beynen AC (2007). Influence of two different diets on fluid and particle retention time of Javan langur (Trachypithecus auratus auratus). Der Zoologische Garten 77: 36-46.
82.
Vazquez AG (2014). Imagery, Perceptions and Implications of Pet Slow Lorises (Nycticebus spp.) on Web 2.0 Sites. MSc thesis, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
83.
Waters S, El-Harrad A (2013). A note on the effective use of social media to raise awareness against the illegal trade in Barbary macaques. African Primates 8: 67-68.
84.
Wiens F, Zitzmann A (2003). Social structure of the solitary slow loris Nycticebus coucang (Lorisidae). Journal of Zoology 261: 35-46.
85.
Wolfensohn S, Honess P (2005). Handbook of Primate Husbandry and Welfare. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
86.
Wolfensohn S, Honess P (2007). Laboratory animal, pet animal, farm animal, wild animal: which gets the best deal? Animal Welfare 16: 117-123.
87.
Woolverton WL, Ator NA, Beardsley PM, Carroll ME (1989). Effects of environmental conditions on the psychological well-being of primates: a review of the literature. LifeSciences 44: 901-917.
[PubMed]
88.
Wright JH (2010). Use of film for community conservation education in primate habitat countries. American Journal of Primatology 72: 462-466.
[PubMed]
89.
Young R (2003). Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
90.
Zhang L, Hua N, Sun S (2008). Wildlife trade, consumption and conservation awareness in southwest China. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 1493-1516.
91.
Zimmerman N, Pirovino M, Zingg R, Clauss M, Kaup FJ, Heistermann M, Halt JM, Steinmetz HW (2011). Upper respiratory tract disease in captive orang-utans (Pongo sp.): prevalence in 20 European zoos and predisposing factors. Journal of Medical Primatology 40: 365-375.
[PubMed]
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2016
You do not currently have access to this content.
