This study analyzed conflict and postconflict (PC) conciliation between males and females within one-male breeding units in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains, China. The PC matched-control and time rule methods were used to collect and analyze data recorded from September 2013 to June 2014. The conciliatory tendency among individuals following conflict was 82.07%, and affiliation occurred within a few minutes after the conflict, which was not significantly different between mating and nonmating seasons. The PC conciliation scenarios were different from those reported from captivity. Lumbar hold and grooming were the most common expressions in reconciliation. In addition, bystander affiliation was uniquely found, which may be associated with the more terrestrial locomotion of R. roxellana, compared with other colobines.

1.
Arnold K, Aureli F (2007). Postconflict reconciliation. In Primates in Perspective (Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Panger M, Bearder SK, eds.), pp 592-608. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
2.
Arnold K, Barton RA (2001a). Postconflict behavior of spectacled leaf monkeys (Trachypithecus obscurus). I. Reconciliation. International Journal of Primatology 22: 243-266.
3.
Arnold K, Barton RA (2001b). Postconflict behavior of spectacled leaf monkeys (Trachypithecus obscurus). II. Contact with third parties. International Journal of Primatology 22: 267-286.
4.
Aureli F, de Waal FBM (2000). Natural Conflict Resolution. Berkeley, University of California Press.
5.
Aureli F, Schaffner CM (2006). Causes, consequences and mechanisms of reconciliation. In Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution (Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP, eds.), pp 121-136. Berlin, Springer.
6.
Aureli F, van Schaik CP (1991). Post-conflict behaviour in longtailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). I. The social events. Ethology 89: 89-100.
7.
Aureli F, Cords M, van Schaik CP (2002). Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. Animal Behavior 64: 325-343.
8.
Aureli F, Das M, Verleur D, van Hooff JARAM (1994). Postconflict social interactions among Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). International Journal of Primatology 15: 471-485.
9.
Aureli F, van Schaik CP, van Hooff JARAM (1989). Functional aspects of reconciliation among captive long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology 19: 39-51.
10.
Castles DL, Whiten A (1998). Post-conflict behavior of wild olive baboons. II. Stress and self-directed behavior. Ethology 104: 148-160.
11.
Colmenares F (2004). Kinship structure and its impact on behavior in multilevel societies. In Kinship and Behavior in Nonhuman Primates (Chapais B, Berman C, eds.), pp 242-270. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
12.
Colmenares F (2006). Is postconflict affiliation in captive nonhuman primates an artifact of captivity? International Journal of Primatology 27: 1311-1336.
13.
Das M, Penke Z, van Hooff JARAM (1998). Post-conflict affiliation and stress-related behavior of long-tailed macaque aggressors. International Journal of Primatology 19: 53-71.
14.
De Waal FBM (1989). Dominance ‘style' and primate social organization. In Comparative Socioecology: The Behavioral Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals (Standen V, Foley R, eds.), pp 243-263. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific.
15.
De Waal FBM (2000). Primates: a natural heritage of conflict resolution. Science 289: 586-590.
16.
De Waal FBM, van Roosmalen A (1979). Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5: 55-66.
17.
De Waal FBM, Yoshihara D (1983). Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. Behavior 85: 224-241.
18.
Fraser ON, Stahl D, Aureli F (2008). Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 8557-8562.
19.
Grüter CC (2004). Conflict and postconflict behavior in captive black-and-white snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti). Primates 45: 197-200.
20.
Guo ST, Li BG, Watanabe K (2007). Diet and activity budget of Rhinopithecus roxellana in the Qinling Mountains, China. Primates 48: 268-276.
21.
He HX, Zhao HT, Qi XG, Wang XW, Guo ST, Ji WH, Wang CL, Wei W, Li BG (2013). Dominance rank of adult females and mating competition in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains, China. Chinese Science Bulletin 58: 2205-2211.
22.
Henzi P, Barrett L (2003). Evolutionary ecology, sexual conflict, and behavior differentiation among baboon populations. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 217-230.
23.
Judge PG (1991). Dyadic and triadic reconciliation in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina). American Journal of Primatology 23: 225-237.
24.
Li BG, Zhao DP (2007). Copulation behavior within one-male groups of wild Rhinopithecus roxellana in the Qinling Mountains of China. Primates 48: 190-196.
25.
Li BG, Chen C, Ji WH, Ren BP (2000). Seasonal home range changes of the Sichuan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains of China. Folia Primatologica 71: 375-386.
26.
Li BG, Li HQ, Zhao DP (2006). Study on dominance hierarchy of the golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in Qinling Mountains. Acta Theriologica Sinica 26: 18-25.
27.
Li BG, Zhang P, Watanabe K, Tan CL (2002). Does allogrooming serve a hygienic function in the golden snub-nosed monkey? Acta Zoologica Sinica 48: 707-715.
28.
McFarland R, Majolo B (2012). The occurrence and benefits of postconflict bystander affiliation in wild Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Animal Behavior 84: 583-591.
29.
Palombit RA, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1997). The adaptive value of ‘friendships' to female baboons: experimental and observational evidence. Animal Behavior 54: 599-614.
30.
Qi JF (1989). The feed and reproduction of the Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys. In Progress in the Study of Sichuan Snub-Nosed Monkeys (Chen FG, ed.), pp 287-292. Xi'an, Northwest University Press.
31.
Qi XG, Garber PA, Ji WH, Huang ZP, Huang K, Zhang P, Guo ST, Wang XW, He G, Zhang P, Li BG (2014). Satellite telemetry and social modeling offer new insights into the origin of primate multilevel societies. Nature Communications 5: 5296.
32.
Ren RM, Qi H, Liang B, Bao W, de Waal FBM (1991). The reconciliation behavior of golden monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in small breeding groups. Primates 32: 321-327.
33.
Ren RM, Yan KH, Xia SZ, Jin HY, Qiu JJ, Romero T (2010). Social behavior of a captive group of golden snub-nosed langur Rhinopithecus roxellana. Zoological Studies 49: 1-8.
34.
Silk JB (2002). The form and function of reconciliation in primates. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 31: 21-44.
35.
Tan CL, Guo ST, Li BG (2007). Population structure and ranging patterns of Rhinopithecus roxellana in Zhouzhi National Nature Reserve, Shaanxi, China. International Journal of Primatology 28: 577-591.
36.
Veenema HC, Das M, Aureli F (1994). Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliation. Behavioral Process 31: 29-37.
37.
Watts DP, Colmenares F, Arnold K (2000). Redirection, consolation and male policing. How targets of aggression interact with bystanders. In Natural Conflict Resolution (Aureli F, de Waal FBM, eds.), pp 281-301. Berkeley, University of California Press.
38.
Zhang J, Zhao DP, Li BG (2010). Postconflict behavior among female Rhinopithecus roxellana within one-male units in the Qinling Mountains, China. Current Zoology 56: 222-226.
39.
Zhang P, Watanabe K, Li BG, Tan CL (2006). Social organization of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains, Central China. Primates 47: 374-382.
40.
Zhao HT, Dang GD, Wang CL, Wang XW, Guo D, Luo X, Zhao JQ, He ZB, Li BG (2015). Diet and seasonal changes in Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the southern Qinling Mountains in China. Acta Theriologica Sinica 35: 130-137.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.