During play, primates may become more vulnerable to predation. Our goal was to examine the potential role of predation risk on the play behavior of 3 groups of golden-headed lion tamarin, Leontopithecus chrysomelas, in shaded cocoa agroforest (cabruca) of Southern Bahia, Brazil. We identified the preferred (and safer) locations on vertical strata during playtime and investigated if frequency and duration of play differed according to group size. All groups preferred to play on the lower levels of vertical strata, which may be perceived as either a safer environment or as a more suitable location for play due to the vegetation structure. The smallest group played less than the others, while the largest group played more and for longer periods. Our data suggest that predation risk can influence where play takes place as well as its frequency and length.

1.
Altmann J (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227-267.
2.
Baldwin JD, Baldwin JI (1976). Effects of food ecology on social play: a laboratory simulation. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 40: 1-14.
3.
Barrett L, Dunbar RIM, Dunbar P (1992). Environmental influences on play behaviour in immature gelada baboons. Animal Behaviour 44: 111-115.
4.
Bekoff M, Byers JA (1992). Time, energy and play. Animal Behaviour 44: 981-982.
5.
Bekoff M, Byers JA (1998). Animal Play - Evolutionary, Comparative and Ecological Perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
6.
Berger J (1980). The ecology, structure and functions of social play in Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Journal of Zoology 192: 531-542.
7.
Biben M, Symmes D, Bernhards D (1989). Vigilance during play in squirrel monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 17: 41-49.
8.
Blumstein DT (1998). Quantifying predation risk for refuging animals: a case study with golden marmots. Ethology 104: 501-516.
9.
Chapman AP, Chapman LJ (2000). Constraints on group size in primates: the importance of travel costs. In On the Move: How and why Animals Travel in Groups (Boinski S, Garber P, eds.), pp 24-42. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
10.
Defler TR (1995). The time budget of a group of wild woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha). International Journal of Primatology 16: 107-120.
11.
Enomoto T (1990). Social play and sexual behavior of the bonobo (Pan paniscus) with special reference to flexibility. Primates 31: 469-480.
12.
Fagen R (1981). Animal Play Behavior. New York, Oxford University Press.
13.
Guidorizzi CE (2008). Ecologia e Comportamento do Mico-Leão-da-Cara-Dourada, Leontophitecus chrysomelas (Kuhl, 1820) (Primates, Callithrichidae), em um fragmento de floresta semidecidual em Itororó, Bahia, Brasil. Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Bahia.
14.
Harcourt R (1991). Survivorship costs of play in the South American fur seal. Animal Behaviour 42: 509-511.
15.
Isbell LA (1994). Predation on primates: ecological patterns and evolutionary consequences. Evolutionary Anthropology 3: 61-71.
16.
IUCN (2013). IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2013.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed July 23, 2013).
17.
Johns ND (1999). Conservation in Brazil's chocolate forest: the unlikely persistence of the traditional cocoa agroecosystem. Environmental Management 23: 31-47.
18.
Lewis KP (2005). Social play in the great apes. In The Nature of Play - Great Apes and Humans (Pellegrini AD, Smith PK, eds.), pp 27-53. New York, Guilford Press.
19.
Li Z, Rogers E (2004). Habitat quality and activity budgets of white-headed langurs in Fusui, China. International Journal of Primatology 25: 41-54.
20.
Markus N, Croft DB (1995). Play behaviour and its effects on social development of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Primates 36: 213-225.
21.
Martin P (1984). The time and energy costs of play behaviour in the cat. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 64: 298-312.
22.
Martin P, Caro TM (1985). On the functions of play and its role in behavioral development. Advances in the Study of Behavior 15: 59-103.
23.
Miller LE (2002a). An introdution to predator sensitive foraging. In Eat or Be Eaten - Predator Sensitive Foraging among Primates (Miller LE, ed.), pp 1-17. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
24.
Miller LE (2002b). The role of group size in predator sensitive foraging decisions for wedge-capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus olivaceus). In Eat or Be Eaten - Predator Sensitive Foraging among Primates (Miller LE, ed.), pp 95-106. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
25.
Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM (1974). A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 541-545.
26.
Oliveira CR, Ruiz-Miranda CR, Kleiman DG, Beck BB (2003). Play behavior in juvenile golden lion tamarins (Callitrichidae: Primates): organization in relation to costs. Ethology 109: 1-20.
27.
Oliveira LC, Dietz JM (2011). Predation risk and the interspecific association of two Brazilian Atlantic forest primates in cabruca agroforest. American Journal of Primatology 73: 852-860.
28.
Oliveira LC, Neves LG, Raboy BE, Dietz JM (2011). Abundance of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) affects group characteristics and use of space by golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) in cabruca agroforest. Environmental Management 48:248-262.
29.
Palagi E, Cordoni G, Borgognini Tarli SM (2004). Immediate and delayed benefits of play behaviour: new evidence from chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Ethology 110: 949-962.
30.
Paukner A, Suomi SJ (2008). Sex differences in play behavior in juvenile tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Primates 49: 288-291.
31.
Pulliam HR (1973). On the advantages of flocking. Journal of Theoretical Biology 38: 419-422.
32.
Raboy BE, Dietz JM (2004). Diet, foraging, and use of space in wild golden-headed lion tamarins. American Journal of Primatology 63: 1-15.
33.
Raboy BE, Neves LG, Zeigler S, Saraiva N, Cardoso N, Santos G, Ballou J, Leimgruber P (2010). Strength of habitat and landscape metrics in predicting golden-headed lion tamarin presence or absence in forest patches. Biotropica 42: 388-397.
34.
R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
35.
Reis PP (2012). Comportamento do mico-leão-da-cara-dourada, Leontopithecus chrysomelas, em áreas de cabruca do sudeste da Bahia. Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Bahia.
36.
Rylands AB (1989). Sympatric Brazilian callithrichids: the black tufted-ear marmoset, Callithrix kuhli, and the golden-headed lion tamarin, Leontopithecus chrysomelas. Journal of Human Evolution 18: 679-695.
37.
Sommer V, Mendoza-Granados D (1995). Play as an indicator of habitat quality: a field study of langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus). Ethology 99: 177-192.
38.
Stone AI (2008). Seasonal effects on play behavior in immature Saimiri sciureus in Eastern Amazonia. International Journal of Primatology 29: 195-205.
39.
Worch EA (2012). Play initiating behaviors and responses in red colobus monkeys. American Journal of Play 5: 104-119.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.