Linking predator avoidance and social organisation predicts that large groups are favoured under heavy predation pressure but that small, inconspicuous groups may do equally well by avoiding detection altogether. We explored the relationships between antipredator behaviour (vocalisation, concealment, fleeing), detectability (colouration, group size) and social organisation in arboreal langurs. Three clear antipredation conditions emerged: (1) exemplified by Presbytis melalophos – brightly-coloured species (red, yellow) with contrasting colours, living in large unimale-multifemale groups (>10 individuals), that vocalised frequently and that flee loudly through the canopy; (2) exemplified by P. comata – greyish species (some contrasting colours), living in intermediate, unimale-multifemale or 1-male-1-female groups (approx. 7 individuals), that vocalise infrequently and that flee through the middle forest layers; (3) exemplified by P. frontata – dull-coloured species without contrast, living in small unimale-multifemale or 1-male-1-female groups (<5 individuals), that may freeze upon detection, and that may vocalise mainly during the night. Crypsis as an antipredator strategy is restricted to taxa that occur in 1-male-1-female groups. This wide range of antipredator strategies within a monophyletic taxon living in the same general area with a similar suite of predators facing similar predator pressures appears to be unique among the order Primates.

1.
Banks E (1931). A popular account of the mammals of Borneo. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 9: 1–139.
2.
Bartels M (1937). Zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung und der Lebensweise javanischer Säugetiere. Treubia 16: 149–164.
3.
Bennett EL, Davies AG (1994). The ecology of Asian colobines. In Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution (Davies AG, Oates JF, eds.), pp 129–171. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bradley BJ, Mundy NI (2008). The primate palette: the evolution of primate coloration. Evolutionary Anthropology 17: 97–111.
5.
Charif RA, Mitchell S, Clark CW (1995). Canary 1.2.4 user’s manual. Ithaca, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.
6.
Charnov EL, Krebs JR (1975). Evolution of alarm calls: altruism or manipulation? American Naturalist 109: 107–112.
7.
Cheney DL (1987). Interactions and relationships between groups. In Primate Societies (Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT, eds.), pp 267–281. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
8.
Coomans de Ruiter L (1932). Het roode bergaapje en andere slankapen. In Borneo’s wonderwereld, schetsen over dieren en planten, pp 34–45. Batavia, Nederlandsch-Indische Natuurhistorische Vereeniging.
9.
Curtin SH (1980). Dusky and banded leaf monkeys. In Malayan Forest Primates: Ten Years’ Study in Tropical Rainforest (Chivers DJ, ed.), pp 107–145. New York, Plenum Press.
10.
Davis DD (1962). Mammals of the lowland rain-forest of north Borneo. Bulletin of the National Museum of Singapore 31: 5–129.
11.
Dehn MM (1990). Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 26: 337–342.
12.
Fam SD, Nijman V (2011). Spizaetus hawk-eagles as predators of arboreal colobines. Primates 52: 105–110.
13.
Fichtel C (2007). Avoiding predators at night: antipredator strategies in red-tailed sportive lemurs (Lepilemur ruficaudatus). American Journal of Primatology 69: 611–624.
14.
Fichtel C, Kappeler PM (2002). Anti-predator behavior of group-living Malagasy primates: mixed evidence for a referential alarm call system. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51: 262–275.
15.
Fredriksson GM, Nijman V (2004). Habitat use and conservation of two elusive ground birds (Carpococcyxradiatus and Polyplectron schleiermacheri) in the Sungai Wain Protection Forest, East Borneo. Oryx 38: 297–303.
16.
Fuentes A (1996). Feeding and ranging in the Mentawai langur (Presbytis potenziani). International Journal of Primatology 17: 525–548.
17.
Gautier-Hion A, Gautier JP (1978). De Brazza’s monkey: an original strategy. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 46: 84–104.
18.
Groves CP (2001). Primate Taxonomy. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press.
19.
Gurmaya KJ (1989). Ecology, behavior and sociality of Thomas’ leaf monkey in north Sumatra. Comparative Primatology Monographs 2: 53–170.
20.
Gursky SL, Nekaris KAI (2007). Primate Anti-Predator Strategies. New York, Springer.
21.
Hadi S, Ziegler T, Waltert M, Syamsuri F, Mühlenberg M, Hodges JK (2012). Habitat use and trophic niche overlap of two sympatric colobines, Presbytis potenziani and Simias concolor, on Siberut Island, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 33: 218–232
22.
Hart D (2007). Predation on primates: a biogeographical analysis. In Primate Anti-Predator Strategies (Gursky SL, Nekaris KAI, eds.), pp 27–59. New York, Springer.
23.
Hohmann G, Fruth B (1995). Loud calls in great apes: sex differences and social correlates. In Current Topics in Primate Vocal Communication (Zimmermann E, Newman JD, Jürgens U, eds.), pp 161–184. New York, Plenum Press.
24.
Indrawan M, Rangkuti F (2001). Development, biodiversity and the conservation status of banded langur in Natuna Islands, Indonesia. Tropical Biodiversity 7: 151–163.
25.
Jaffe KE, Isbell LA (2011). The guenons: polyspecific associations in socioecological perspective. In Primates in Perspective (Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Bearder SK, Stumpf RM, eds.), 2nd ed., pp 277–300. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
26.
Janson CH (1998). Testing the predation hypothesis for vertebrate sociality: prospects and pitfalls. Behaviour 135: 389–410.
27.
Lammertink M, Nijman V, Setiorini U (2003). Population size, Red List status and conservation of the Natuna leaf monkey Presbytis natunae endemic to the island of Bunguran, Indonesia. Oryx 37: 472–479.
28.
Martin P, Bateson P (2007). Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
29.
Megantara E (1989). Ecology, behavior and sociology of Presbytis femoralis in east central Sumatra. ComparativePrimatological Monographs 2: 171–301.
30.
Meijaard E, Welsh A, Ancrenaz M, Nijman V, Wich SA, Marshall AJ (2010). Orangutan encounter rates from Wallace to the present suggest the species was once more abundant. PLoS One 5: e12042.
31.
Melisch R, Dirgayusa IWA (1996). Notes on the grizzled leaf monkey (Presbytis comata) from two nature reserves in West Java, Indonesia. Asian Primates 6: 5–11.
32.
Nekaris KAI (2001). Activity budget and positional behaviour of the Mysore slender loris: implications for slow climbing locomotion. Folia Primatologica 72: 228–241.
33.
Nijman V (1997). On the occurrence and distribution of Presbytis comata (Desmarest 1822) (Mammalia: Primates: Cercopithecidae) on Java, Indonesia. Contributions to Zoology 66: 247–256.
34.
Nijman V (2001). Forest (and) Primates: Conservation and Ecology of the Endemic Primatesof Java and Borneo. Wageningen, Tropenbos Foundation.
35.
Nijman V (2004). Effects of habitat disturbance and hunting on the endemic Hose’s leaf monkey Presbytis hosei (Thomas 1889) (Mammalia: Primates: Cercopithecidae) in East Borneo. Contributions to Zoology 73: 283–291.
36.
Nijman V (2005). Decline of the endemic Hose’s langur Presbytis hosei in Kayan Mentarang National Park, East Borneo. Oryx 39: 223–226.
37.
Nijman V (2010). Ecology and conservation of the Hose’s langur group (Colobinae: Presbytis hosei, P. canicrus, P. sabana): a review. In Behavior, Ecology and Conservation of Indonesian Primates (Gursky S, Supriatna J, eds.), pp 269–284. New York, Springer.
38.
Nijman V, Meijaard E (2008). Zoogeography of primates in insular Southeast Asia: species-area relationships and the effects of taxonomy. Contributions to Zoology 77: 117–126.
39.
Nijman V, van Balen S (1998). A faunal survey of the Dieng Mountains, Central Java, Indonesia: status and distribution of endemic primate taxa. Oryx 32: 145–156.
40.
Rowe N, Myers M (eds.) (2010). All the World’s Primates. http://www.alltheworldsprimate.com (accessed March 1, 2012).
41.
Ruhiyat Y (1983). Socio-ecological study of Presbytis aygula in West Java. Primates 24: 344–359.
42.
Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210: 801–803.
43.
Siegel S (1956). Non-Parametric Statistics. New York, McGraw-Hill.
44.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. New York, Freeman & Co.
45.
Sterck EHM, van Hooff JARAM (2000). The number of males in langur groups: monopolizability of females or demographic processes. In Primate Males (Kappeler PM, ed.), pp 120–129. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
46.
Stott K, Selsor CJ (1961). Observations of the maroon leaf monkey in North Borneo. Mammalia 25: 184–189.
47.
Supriatna J, Manullang BO, Soekara E (1986). Group composition, home range, and diet of the maroon leaf monkey (Presbytis rubicunda) at Tanjung Puting Reserve, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Primates 27: 185–190.
48.
Tenaza RR, Fuentes A (1995). Monandrous social organization of pigtailed langurs (Simias concolor) in the Pagai Islands, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 16: 295–310.
49.
Tilson RL (1977). Social organization of simakobu monkeys (Nasalis concolor) in Siberut Island, Indonesia. Journal of Mammalogy 58: 202–212.
50.
Tilson RL, Tenaza RR (1976). Monogamy and duetting in an Old World monkey. Nature 263: 320–321.
51.
Treves A (1999). Within-group vigilance in red colobus and redtail monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 48: 113–126.
52.
van Schaik CP (1983). Why are diurnal primates living in groups? Behaviour 87: 120–144.
53.
van Schaik CP, Hörstermann M (1994). Predation risk and the number of adult males in a primate group: a comparative test. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 35: 261–272.
54.
van Schaik CP, van Hooff JARAM (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems. Behaviour 85: 91–117.
55.
Watanabe K (1981). Variations in group composition and population density in the two sympatric Mentawaian leaf-monkeys. Primates 22: 145–160.
56.
Wheeler BC (2008). Selfish or altruistic? An analysis of alarm call function in wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella nigritus. Animal Behaviour 76: 1465–1475.
57.
Wich SA (2002). The Structure and Function of Thomas Langur Loud Calls. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
58.
Wich SA, Sterck EHM (2003). Possible audience effect in Thomas langurs (Primates; Presbytis thomasi): an experimental study on male loud calls in response to a tiger model. American Journal of Primatology 60: 155–159.
59.
Zuberbühler K (2000). Referential labeling in Diana monkeys. Animal Behaviour 59: 917–927.
60.
Zuberbühler K, Jenny D, Bshary R (1999). The predator deterrence function of primate alarm calls. Ethology 105: 477–490.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.