Rehabilitation and release have become central to the management and welfare of primate species in South Africa such as the vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops). However, limited research means that it is unknown whether rehabilitation is a successful management strategy for this species. This study describes the release of a troop of rehabilitated vervet monkeys and evaluates the results of 1 year of post-release monitoring. The released animals exhibited wild behaviours and established a home range. Survival could not be adequately evaluated due to the high number of untraceable animals, and troop composition was significantly different from that of wild troops. Improvement may be gained by radio-collaring more animals using improved technology, ensuring that troop composition is comparable to wild troops, excluding ex-pets from re-introduction and a more detailed assessment of the release site.

1.
Animal Care and Use Committee (1998). Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 1416–1431.
2.
Baker LR (2002). Guidelines for nonhuman primate re-introductions. Re-Introduction News 21: 29–57.
3.
Baoping R, Ming L, Yongcheng L, Fuwen W (2009). Influence of day length, ambient temperature, and seasonality on daily travel distance in the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey at Jinsichang, Yunnan, China. American Journal of Primatology 71: 233–241.
4.
Bennett J (1992). A glut of gibbons in Sarawak – is rehabilitation the answer? Oryx 26: 157–164.
5.
Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1981). Selective forces affecting the predator alarm calls of vervet monkeys. Behaviour 76: 25–61.
6.
Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1983). Nonrandom dispersal in free-ranging vervet monkeys: social and genetic consequences. American Naturalist 122: 392–412.
7.
Cowlishaw G, Dunbar R (eds.) (2000). Primate Conservation Biology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
8.
De Moor PP, Steffens FE (1972). The movements of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) within their ranges as revealed by radio-tracking. Journal of Animal Ecology 41: 677–687.
9.
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (1992). Ntendeka Wilderness. Eshowe, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Forestry Branch.
10.
De Silva GS (1971). Notes on the orang-utan rehabilitation project in Sabah. Malaysian Nature Journal 24: 50–77.
11.
Dunbar RIM (1974). Observations on the ecology and social organization of the green monkey, Cercopithecus sabaeus, in Senegal. Primates 15: 341–350.
12.
Dunbar RIM (1992). Time: a hidden constraint on the behavioural ecology of baboons. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 31: 35–49.
13.
Goosens B, Setchell JM, Tchidongo E, Dilambaka E, Vidal C, Ancrenaz M, Jamart A (2005). Survival, interactions with conspecifics and reproduction in 37 chimpanzees released into the wild. Biological Conservation 123: 461–475.
14.
Grobler P, Jacquier M, de Nys H, Blair M, Whitten PL, Turner TR (2006). Primate sanctuaries, taxonomy and survival: a case study from South Africa. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology 2: 12–16.
15.
Grueson P (2007). A Case Study of the Rehabilitation of a Troop of Captive Yellow Baboons (Papio cynocephalus) after Release into a Protected Area in Zambia. Master thesis, State University of New York.
16.
Guy AJ, Schuerch FS, Heffernan S, Thomson PC, O’Brien JK, McGreevy PD (2008). The effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate on behavioural responses of captive female hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). Animal Reproduction Science 108: 412–424.
17.
Harrison MJ (1984). Optimal foraging strategies in the diet of the green monkey, Cercopithecus sabaeus, at Mt Assirik, Senegal. International Journal of Primatology 5: 435–471.
18.
Harrisson B (1963). Education to wild living of young orang-utans at Bako National Park, Sarawak. Sarawak Museum Journal 11: 220–258.
19.
Humle T, Colin C, Laurans M, Raballand E (2011). Group release of sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in the Haut Niger National Park, Guinea, West Africa: ranging patterns and lessons so far. International Journal of Primatology 32: 456–473.
20.
Isbell LA (1990). Sudden short-term increase in mortality of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) due to leopard predation in Amboseli National Park, Kenya. American Journal of Primatology 21: 41–52.
21.
IUCN (2010). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed April 12, 2011).
22.
King T, Chamberlan C, Courage A (2005). Reintroduced gorillas: reproduction, ranging and unresolved issues. Gorilla Journal 30: 30–32.
23.
Markham C, Altman J (2008). Remote monitoring of primates using automated GPS technology in open habitats. American Journal of Primatology 70: 495–499.
24.
Melnick DJ, Pearl MC (1987). Cercopithecines in multimale groups: genetic diversity and population structure. In Primate Societies (Smuts B, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT, eds.), pp 121–134. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
25.
Pruetz JD, Isbell LA (2000). Correlations of food distribution and patch size with agonistic interactions in female vervets (Chlorocebus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) living in simple habitats. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 49: 38–47.
26.
Southern Africa Places (2011). Ntendeka Wilderness. http://www.places.co.za/html/ntendeka.html (accessed May 25, 2011).
27.
Sprague DS, Kabaya H, Hagihara K (2004). Field testing a global positioning system (GPS) collar on a Japanese monkey: reliability of automatic GPS positioning in a Japanese forest. Primates 45: 151–154.
28.
Struhsaker TT (1967a). Behavior of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops).University of California Publications of Zoology 82: 1–64.
29.
Struhsaker TT (1967b). Social structure among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Behaviour 29: 83–121.
30.
Suarez CE, Gamboa EM, Claver P, Nassar-Montoya (2001). Survival and adaptation of a released group of confiscated capuchin monkeys. Animal Welfare 10: 191–203.
31.
Tutin CEG, Ancrenaz M, Paredes J, Vacher-Vallas M, Vidal C, Goosens B, Bruford MW, Jamart A (2001). Conservation biology framework for the release of wild-born orphaned chimpanzees into the Conkouati Reserve, Congo. Conservation Biology 15: 1247–1257.
32.
Venter F, Venter JA (2005). Making the Most of Indigenous Trees, 2nd ed. Pretoria, Briza Publications.
33.
Vogel I, Glowing B, Saint Pierre I, Bayart F, Contamin H, de Thoisy B (2002). Squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) rehabilitation in French Guinea: a case study. Neotropical Primates 10: 147–151.
34.
Whittsit F (1995). Social behaviour and rehabilitation of primates. In Proceedings of the SASOL Symposium on Wildlife Rehabilitation, 1995 (Penzhorn BL, ed.), pp 101–105. Onderstepoort, Centre for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife.
35.
Wikipedia (2011). Vervet monkey. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vervet_monkey#Diet (accessed November 3, 2011).
36.
Willems EP, Hill RA (2009). A critical assessment of two species distribution models: a case study of the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). Journal of Biogeography 36: 2300–2312.
37.
Wimberger K, Downs CT, Perin MR (2010). Postrelease success of two rehabilitated vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) troops in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Folia Primatologica 81: 96–108.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.