We studied the feeding ecology of 3 sympatric primate species, the lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus), bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) and Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus entellus), in a tropical rain forest of the Central Western Ghats, India. Since the availability of leaves is much higher than that of fruits, we expected that the primarily folivorous langurs would use a larger number of resources than the primarily frugivorous macaques. Since fruits are a relatively total resource, unlike leaves, of which only selected parts are consumed, we expected that the primarily frugivorous macaques would use resources more proportionately than the folivorous langurs, resulting in a wider food niche breadth in macaques. We collected data on these primate species over a period of 2 years using scan sampling in a contiguous rain forest. We calculated Levin’s standardised food niche breadth for each species. Langurs used a larger number of tree species than macaques, but their niche breadth was narrower than that of macaques. The majority of their diet (over 50%) came from only a few trees in the case of all three primate species. Long-term data are provided herein for the first time on the feeding ecology of bonnet macaques and Hanuman langurs in a tropical rain forest.

1.
Altmann J (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.
2.
Champion HG, Seth SK (2005). A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India (reprinted). Dehradun, Natraj.
3.
Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Bjorndal KA, Onderdonk DA (2002). Application of protein to fiber ratios to predict colobine abundance on different spatial scales. International Journal of Primatology 23: 283–310.
4.
Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Naughton-Treves L, Lawes MJ, McDowell LR (2004). Predicting folivorous primate abundance: validation of a nutritional model. American Journal of Primatology 62: 55–69.
5.
Chhangani AK, Mohnot SM (2006). Ranging behaviour of Hanuman langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) in three different habitats. Primate Conservation 21: 171–177.
6.
Cipolini ML, Levey DJ (1997). Secondary metabolites of fleshy vertebrate-dispersed fruits: adaptive hypothesis and implications for seed dispersal. American Naturalist 150: 346–372.
7.
Dew JL (2005). Foraging, food choice and food processing by sympatric ripe fruit specialists: Lagothrix lagothricha poeppigii and Ateles belzebuth belzebuth. International Journal of Primatology 26: 1107–1135.
8.
Felton AM, Felton A, Wood JT, Lindenmayer DB (2008). Diet and feeding ecology of Ateles chamek in a Bolivian semihumid forest: the importance of Ficus as a staple food resource. International Journal of Primatology 29: 379–403.
9.
Gamble JS, Fischer CEC (1916–1935). Flora of the Presidency of Madras. Dehradun, Shiva Offset Press, 3 volumes.
10.
Ganesh T, Davidar P (1997). Flowering phenology and flower predation of Cullenia exarillata (Bombacaceae) by arboreal vertebrates in Western Ghats, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13: 459–468.
11.
Harris TR, Chapman CA, Monfort SL (2009). Small folivorous primate groups exhibit behavioral and physiological effects of food scarcity. Behavioural Ecology 21: 46–56.
12.
Herrera CM (1982). Defense of ripe fruits from pests: its significance in relation to plant-disperser interactions. American Naturalist 120: 218–241.
13.
Hladik CM (1977). A comparative study of the feeding strategies of two sympatric species of leaf monkeys: Presbytis senex and Presbytis entellus. In Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes (Clutton-Brock TH, ed.), pp 323–353. London, Academic Press.
14.
Hurlbert SH (1978). The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59: 67–77.
15.
Koenig A (1996). The fairytale of gentle leaf eaters: food competition and social relationship in female common langurs (Presbytis entellus). Primate Report 44: 27.
16.
Koenig A, Borries C (2001). Socioecology of Hanuman langurs: the story of their success. Evolutionary Anthropology 10: 122–137.
17.
Koenig A, Borries C, Chalise MK, Winkler P (1997). Ecology, nutrition and timing of reproductive events in an Asian primate, the Hanuman langur (Presbytis entellus). Journal of Zoology 243: 215–235.
18.
Krishnamani R (1994). Diet composition of the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) in a tropical dry evergreen forest of southern India. Tropical Biodiversity 2: 285–302.
19.
Kumar A (1987). The Ecology and Population Dynamics of the Lion-Tailed Macaque (Macaca silenus) of South India. PhD thesis, Cambridge University.
20.
Kumara HN, Singh M (2004). Distribution and abundance of primates in rainforests of the Western Ghats, Karnataka, India and the conservation of Macaca silenus. International Journal of Primatology 26: 1001–1018.
21.
Kumara HN, Singh M, Sharma AK, Singh M, Kumar MA (2000). Faunal component in the diet of lion-tailed macaques. Primate Report 58: 57–66.
22.
Lehner PN (1996). Handbook of Ethological Methods. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
23.
Lopez JE, Vaughan C (2007). Food niche overlap among neotropical frugivorous bats in Costa Rica. International Journal of Tropical Biology 55: 301–313.
24.
Mathur R, Bhatnagar PS, Manahar BR (1990). Ticks, lice and grasshopper eating by Presbytis entellus. Human Evolution 5: 531–536.
25.
Milton K (1983). Dietary quality and population regulation in a howler monkey population. In The Ecology of a Rainforest (Leigh EG, Rand AS, Windsor DM, eds.), pp 273–290. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
26.
Molur S, Brandon-Jones D, Dittus W, Eudey A, Kumar A, Singh M, Feeroz MM, Chalise M, Priya P, Walker S (2003). Status of South Asian Primates: Conservation, Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP). Coimbatore, Zoo Outreach Organization/CBSG South Asia.
27.
O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF, Dierenfeid ES (1998). What’s so special about figs? Nature 392: 668.
28.
Pascal JP (1988). Wet Evergreen Forests of the Western Ghats of India: Ecology, Structure, Floristic Composition and Succession. Pondicherry, Institut Français de Pondicherry.
29.
Pascal JP, Ramesh BR (1997). A Field Key to the Trees and Lianas of the Evergreen Forests of the Western Ghats. Pondicherry, Institut Français de Pondicherry.
30.
Ramachandran KK, Joseph GK (2000). Habitat utilization of lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) in Silent Valley National Park, Kerala, India. Primate Report 58: 17–25.
31.
Redford KH, Da Fonseca GAB, Lacher TE (1984). The relationship between frugivory and insectivory in primates. Primates 24: 433–440.
32.
Remis M, Dierenfeld ES (2004). Digesta passage, digestibility and behavior in captive gorillas under two dietary regimens. International Journal of Primatology 25: 825–846.
33.
Remis MJ (2000). Initial studies on the contributions of body size and gastrointestinal passage times to dietary flexibility among gorillas. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 112: 171–180.
34.
Remis MJ (2003). Are gorillas vacuum cleaners of the forest floor? The roles of body size, habitat and food preferences on dietary flexibility and nutrition. In Gorilla Biology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (Taylor AB, Goldsmith ML, eds.), pp 385–404. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
35.
Roy K, Singh M, Sushma HS, Singh M (2010). Stand structure of a primate rich rainforest region in the central Western Ghats of southern India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 2: 930–939.
36.
Sheskin DJ (2000). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Chapman and Hall.
37.
Singh M (1999). Studies on ecology, adaptation and evolution of sociality in non-human primates of South India. Final technical report for research project submitted to the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
38.
Singh M, Roy K, Singh M (2011). Resource partitioning in sympatric langurs and macaques in tropical rainforests of the central Western Ghats, South India. American Journal of Primatology 73: 335–346.
39.
Singh M, Singh M, Kumar MA, Kumara HN, De Souza L, Sharma AK (1998). Behaviour of lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) in vulnerable and relatively secure habitats in the rain forests of Western Ghats, India. Tigerpaper 25: 19–25.
40.
Singh M, Singh M, Kumar MA, Kumara HN, Sharma AK, Sushma HS (2000). Niche separation in sympatric lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) and Nilgiri langur (Presbytis johnii) in an Indian tropical rain forest. Primate Report 58: 83–95.
41.
Sinha A (2005). Not in their genes: phenotypic flexibility, behavioural traditions and cultural evolution in wild bonnet macaques. Journal of Biosciences 30: 51–64.
42.
Solanki GS, Kumar A, Sharma BK (2008). Feeding ecology of Trachypithecus pileatus in India. International Journal of Primatology 29: 173–182.
43.
Srivastava A (1991). Insectivory and its significance to langur diets. Primates 32: 237–241.
44.
Srivastava A (1992). Use of resources by free-ranging female langurs (Presbytis entellus) during different reproductive phases. Folia Primatologica 59: 157–162.
45.
Sushma HS (2004). Resource Utilization and Niche Separation in Sympatric Rainforest Arboreal Mammals. PhD thesis, University of Mysore.
46.
Sushma HS, Singh M (2006). Resource partitioning and interspecific interactions among sympatric rainforest arboreal mammals of the Western Ghats, India. Behavioural Ecology 17: 479–490.
47.
Umapathy G (1997). Impact of Habitat Fragmentation on the Arboreal Mammals in the Wet Evergreen Forests of the Anaimalai Hills, South India. PhD thesis, Bharathiar University.
48.
Wasserman MD, Chapman CA (2003). Determinants of colobine monkey abundance: the importance of food energy, protein and fibre content. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 650–659.
49.
Wegge P, Shrestha AK, Moe SR (2006). Dry season diets of sympatric ungulates in lowland Nepal: competition and facilitation in alluvial tall grasslands. Ecology Research 21: 698–706.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.