Abstract
Introduction: The Speech Efficiency Score (SES) serves as an acoustic metric for assessing fluency in conversational speech within the temporal domain. This study leverages SES to investigate conversational speech efficiency among native speakers of American English (AE) compared to speakers of Mandarin-accented English (MAE). Methods: SES, speaking rate, articulation rate, and vocabulary diversity were measured and compared between two groups: native AE speakers and MAE speakers. The study utilized conversational speech samples collected from both groups to analyze these metrics. Results: Findings indicate a disparity in speaking rate and articulation rate between the AE and MAE groups, with the AE group exhibiting significantly faster speech. However, no significant differences were observed in SES and vocabulary diversity between the two groups. Conclusion: The results are discussed in the context of the interplay between speaking rate, speech fluency, and vocabulary diversity. These findings shed light on the maintenance of speech efficiency among bilingual speakers, suggesting that despite differences in speaking rate and articulation rate, SES and vocabulary diversity remain comparable between native AE speakers and MAE speakers.
Journal Section:
Research Article
Plain Language Summary
This study compares the efficiency of speech between native American English (AE) speakers and Mandarin-accented English (MAE) speakers. While AE speakers tend to speak faster, both groups communicate equally efficiently. Interestingly, having a diverse vocabulary positively influences speech efficiency in both groups. These findings suggest that despite differences in speaking rate, MAE speakers can effectively communicate in English. This information is valuable for speech therapists and educators working with bilingual individuals, highlighting the importance of vocabulary expansion for improved communication skills. However, due to limitations like a small sample size, further research is necessary to fully grasp how language influences communication efficiency.
Journal Section:
Research Article
References
1.
Amir
O
, Shapira
Y
, Mick
L
, Yaruss
J
. The speech efficiency score (SES): a time-domain measure of speech fluency
. J Fluency Disord
. 2018
;58
:61
–9
. 2.
Chen
Y
, Robb
M
. A study of speaking rate in Mandarin speakers of Anterican English
. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear
. 2004
;9
(3
):173
–88
. 3.
Cotton
J
. Syllabic rate: a new concept in the study of speech rate variation
. Speech Monogr
. 1936
;3
(1
):112
–7
. 4.
Grosjean
F
, Lane
H
. How the listener integrates the components of speaking rate
. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
. 1976
;2
(4
):538
–43
. 5.
Kelly
J
, Steer
M
. Revised concept of rate
. J Speech Hear Disord
. 1949
;14
(3
):222
–6
. 6.
Hammen
V
, Yorkston
K
. Speech and pause characteristics following speech rate reduction in hypokinetic dysarthria
. J Commun Disord
. 1996
;29
(6
):429
–45
. 7.
Crystal
T
, House
A
. Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech
. J Acoust Soc Am
. 1990
;88
(1
):101
–12
. 8.
Dankovičcová
J
. The domain of articulation rate variation in Czech
. J Phon
. 1997
;25
(3
):287
–312
. 9.
10.
Miller
J
, Grosjean
F
, Lomanto
C
. Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous speech: a reanalysis and some implications
. Phonetica
. 1984
;41
(4
):215
–25
. 11.
12.
Badiru
A
. Handbook of industrial and systems engineering
. Boca Raton Florida
: Crc Press, Tayor & Francis Group
; 2014
.13.
Yorkston
K
, Beukelman
D
. Communication efficiency of dysarthric speakers as measured by sentence intelligibility and speaking rate
. J Speech Hear Disord
. 1981
;46
(3
):296
–301
. 14.
Højen
A
. Predictors of bilinguals’ speaking rates
. J Phon
. 2019
;77
:100936
. 15.
Bradlow
A
, Kim
M
, Blasingame
M
. Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate
. J Acous Soc Am
. 2017
;141
(2
):886
–99
. 16.
Yuan
J
, Liberman
M
, Cieri
C
. Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation
; 2006
. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Towards-an-integrated-understanding-of-speaking-in-Yuan-Liberman/494507cb6b92e4ded5eac7849199f3202a9430d517.
Jacewicz
E
, Fox
R
, O’Neill
C
, Salmons
J
. Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender
. Lang Var Change
. 2009
;21
(2
):233
–56
. 18.
Kutsuki
A
. Do bilinguals acquire similar words to monolinguals? An examination of word acquisition and the similarity effect in Japanese—English bilinguals’ vocabularies
. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ
. 2021
;11
(1
):168
–82
. 19.
Zhao
Y
, Yu
X
. Research on the development of cognitive ability of dialect users
. J Learn Norm Univ
. 2021
;40
(5
):96
–103
. 20.
Cheng
N-H
. Explore the difference between bilingual and monolingual children
. Atlantis Press
; 2022
; p. 686
–91
. 21.
Stæhr
L
. Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing
. Lang Learn J
. 2008
;36
(2
):139
–52
. 22.
Daidone
D
, Darcy
I
. Vocabulary size is a key factor in predicting second language lexical encoding accuracy
. Front Psychol
. 2021
;12
:688356
. 23.
United States Census Bureau
. Memorandum. 2020 census non-english language support
[cited 2024 May 4]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade/2020/planning-management/plan/memo-series/2020-memo-2018_06.html24.
Flege
J
, Munro
M
, MacKay
I
. Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language
. J Acoust Soc Am
. 1995
;97
(5 Pt 1
):3125
–34
. 25.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
. Accent modification
. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
[cited 2024 May 4]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Accent-Modification/26.
Xie
X
, Jaeger
TF
. Comparing non-native and native speech: are L2 productions more variable
. J Acoust Soc Am
. 2020
;147
(5
):3322
–47
. 27.
Li
X
, Liu
J
. Syntactic comparison between the English and Chinese interrogative sentences
. Int J Lib Arts Soc Sci
. 2016
;4
(9
):104
–10
.28.
29.
Howie
JM
. Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones
. Cambridge University Press
; 1976
.30.
Chun
D
. Contrastive study of the suprasegmental pitch in modern German, American English and Mandarin Chinese
. Berkeley, CA
: University of California
; 1982
.31.
Sheng
L
, Lu
Y
, Kan
P
. Lexical development in Mandarin–English bilingual children
. Biling
. 2011
;14
(4
):579
–87
. 32.
Versant by Pearson - corporate English language learning | Pearson languages [cited 2024 May 4]. Available from: www.pearson.com. https://www.pearson.com/languages/hr-professionals/versant.html
33.
Johnson
WI
. I. A program of research
. Psychol Monogr
. 1944
;56
(2
):1
–15
. 34.
Hess
C
, Ritchie
K
, Landry
R
. The type-token ratio and vocabulary performance
. Psychol Rep
. 1984
;55
(1
):51
–7
. 35.
Owen
AJ
, Leonard
LB
. Lexical diversity in the spontaneous speech of children with specific language impairment: application of D
. J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2002
;45
(5
):927
–37
. 36.
Bonvin
A
, Lambelet
A
. Algorithmic and subjective measures of lexical diversity in bilingual written corpora: a discussion
. Corela
. 2017
(HS-21
). 37.
Stark
BC
. A comparison of three discourse elicitation methods in aphasia and age-matched adults: implications for language assessment and outcome
. Am J Speech Lang Pathol
. 2019
;28
(3
):1067
–83
. 38.
Bialystok
E
, Craik
F
, Freedman
M
. Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia
. Neuropsychologia
. 2007
;45
(2
):459
–64
. 39.
Chertkow
H
, Whitehead
V
, Phillips
N
, Wolfson
C
, Atherton
J
, Bergman
H
. Multilingualism (but not always bilingualism) delays the onset of Alzheimer disease: evidence from a bilingual community
. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord
. 2010
;24
(2
):118
–25
. 40.
Craik
F
, Bialystok
E
, Freedman
M
. Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease: bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve
. Neurology
. 2010
;75
(19
):1726
–9
. 41.
Kavé
G
, Eyal
N
, Shorek
A
, Cohen-Mansfield
J
. Multilingualism and cognitive state in the oldest old
. Psychol Aging
. 2008
;23
(1
):70
–8
. 42.
Carlson
S
, Meltzoff
A
. Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children
. Dev Sci
. 2008
;11
(2
):282
–98
. 43.
Costa
A
, Hernández
M
, Sebastián-Gallés
N
. Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task
. Cognition
. 2008
;106
(1
):59
–86
. 44.
Walley
A
. The role of vocabulary development in children’s spoken word recognition and segmentation ability
. Dev Rev
. 1993
;13
(3
):286
–350
. 45.
Kohnert
K
, Kan
P
, Conboy
B
. Lexical and grammatical associations in sequential bilingual preschoolers
. J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2010
;53
(3
):684
–98
. 46.
Marchman
V
, Bates
E
. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis
. J Child Lang
. 1994
;21
(2
):339
–66
. 47.
48.
Van Engen
K
, Baese-Berk
M
, Baker
R
, Choi
A
, Kim
M
, Bradlow
A
. The wildcat corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles
. Lang Speech
. 2010
;53
(Pt 4
):510
–40
. 49.
Bradlow
AR
. SpeechBox
[cited 2024 Jul 25]. Available from: https://speechbox.linguistics.northwestern.edu© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2024
You do not currently have access to this content.
