Abstract
Introduction: Hearing loss (HL) strongly impacts communication abilities and impairs social interactions. Moreover, it modifies the vocal parameters of affected patients. The effects of hearing rehabilitation through hearing aids (HA) on the vocal production of patients suffering from HL have not been thoroughly analyzed in the literature. The aim of this study was to use the ambulatory phonation monitor (APM), a portable vocal dosimeter, to evaluate the variations in the vocal production of a group of patients suffering from moderate-to-severe HL treated with HA and the relationship between such modifications and quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients suffering from a variable degree of HL and treated with HA have been enrolled. Each of them underwent an evaluation before and 4 months after rehabilitation with HA. The analysis of daily voice production was carried out with the APM, while subjective QoL data were collected through the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities questionnaire (SSQ) and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). The differences in phonatory measurements and subjective evaluations before and after HA rehabilitation were assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The Spearman correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between phonatory measurements, auditory measurements, and SSQ scores. Results: Significant differences in the APM parameters before and after HA rehabilitation were found. After 4 months of HA use, we recorded a significant increase in phonation time and percentage of phonation time and a significant decrease in average amplitude in dB SPL. We also found a significant increase in the SSQ scores after HA rehabilitation. Finally, we were able to detect low but significant correlations between phonatory measurements and SSQ results. Conclusions: The APM proved to be a useful instrument in the evaluation of the benefits of HA and its measurements can be used as indicators of the participation in communication and social life of patients with HL, which are strongly related to QoL.
Journal Section:
Research Article
References
1.
Lopez-Poveda
EA
, Johannesen
PT
, Pérez-González
P
, Blanco
JL
, Kalluri
S
, Edwards
B
. Predictors of hearing-aid outcomes
. Trends Hear
. 2017
;21
:233121651773052
.2.
Gao
J
, Hu
H
, Yao
L
. The role of social engagement in the association of self-reported hearing loss and health-related quality of life
. BMC Geriatr
. 2020
;20
(1
):182
.3.
Kivimäki
M
, Singh-Manoux
A
. Prevention of dementia by targeting risk factors
. Lancet
. 2018
;391
(10130
):1574
–5
.4.
World Health Organization
World report on hearing
Geneva
World Health Organization
. 2021
. [cited 19 january 2022]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/339913.5.
Selleck
MA
, Sataloff
RT
. The impact of the auditory system on phonation: a review
. J Voice
. 2014
;28
(6
):688
–93
.6.
Mora
R
, Crippa
B
, Cervoni
E
, Santomauro
V
, Guastini
L
. Acoustic features of voice in patients with severe hearing loss
. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
. 2012
;41
(1
):8
–13
.7.
Dehqan
A
, Scherer
RC
. Objective voice analysis of boys with profound hearing loss
. J Voice
. 2011
;25
(2
):e61
–5
.8.
Hamzavi
J
, Deutsch
W
, Baumgartner
WD
, Denk
DM
, Adunka
O
, Gstoettner
W
. [Cochlear implantation and auditory feedback]
. Wien Klin Wochenschr
. 2000
;112
(11
):515
–8
.9.
Ubrig
MT
, Goffi-Gomez
MVS
, Weber
R
, Menezes
MHM
, Nemr
NK
, Tsuji
DH
et al. Voice analysis of postlingually deaf adults pre- and postcochlear implantation
. J Voice
. 2011
;25
(6
):692
–9
.10.
Mozzanica
F
, Schindler
A
, Iacona
E
, Ottaviani
F
. Application of Ambulatory Phonation Monitoring (APM) in the measurement of daily speaking-time and voice intensity before and after cochlear implant in deaf adult patients
. Auris Nasus Larynx
. 2019
;46
(6
):844
–52
.11.
Medved
DMS
, Cavalheri
LMR
, Coelho
AC
, Fernandes
ACN
, Silva
EMD
, Sampaio
ALL
. Systematic review of auditory perceptual and acoustic characteristics of the voice of cochlear implant adult users
. J Voice
. 2021
35
6
934.e7
934.e16
.12.
Lee
GS
, Liu
C
, Lee
SH
. Effects of hearing aid amplification on voice F0 variability in speakers with prelingual hearing loss
. Hear Res
. 2013
;302
:1
–8
.13.
Hillman
RE
, Heaton
JT
, Masaki
A
, Zeitels
SM
, Cheyne
HA
. Ambulatory monitoring of disordered voices
. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
. 2006
;115
(11
):795
–801
.14.
Cheyne
HA
, Hanson
HM
, Genereux
RP
, Stevens
KN
, Hillman
RE
. Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator
. J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2003
;46
(6
):1457
–67
.15.
Cantarella
G
, Iofrida
E
, Boria
P
, Giordano
S
, Binatti
O
, Pignataro
L
et al. Ambulatory phonation monitoring in a sample of 92 call center operators
. J Voice
. 2014
28
3
393.e1
393.e6
.16.
Mozzanica
F
, Selvaggio
A
, Ginocchio
D
, Pizzorni
N
, Scarponi
L
, Schindler
A
. Speech and language pathologists’ voice use in working environments: a field study using ambulatory phonation monitoring
. Folia Phoniatr Logop
. 2016
;68
(6
):268
–73
.17.
Lyberg Åhlander
V
, Pelegrín García
D
, Whitling
S
, Rydell
R
, Löfqvist
A
. Teachers’ voice use in teaching environments: a field study using ambulatory phonation monitor
. J Voice
. 2014
28
6
841.e5
15
.18.
Švec
JG
, Titze
IR
, Popolo
PS
. Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck
. J Acoust Soc Am
. 2005
117
3 Pt 1
1386
94
.19.
Kodera
K
, Hosoi
H
, Okamoto
M
, Manabe
T
, Kanda
Y
, Shiraishi
K
et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting
. Auris Nasus Larynx
. 2016
;43
(3
):217
–28
.20.
Gatehouse
S
, Noble
W
. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ)
. Int J Audiol
. 2004
;43
(2
):85
–99
.21.
Cox
RM
, Stephens
D
, Kramer
SE
. Translations of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): traducciones del Inventario Internacional de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA)
. Int J Audiol
. 2002
;41
(1
):3
–26
.22.
Cox
RM
, Alexander
GC
, Beyer
CM
. Norms for the international Outcome inventory for hearing aids
. J Am Acad Audiol
. 2003
;14
(08
):403
–13
.23.
Kozlowski
L
, Almeida
G
, Ribas
A
. Level of user satisfaction with hearing aids and environment: the international Outcome inventory for hearing aids
. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol
. 2014
;18
(3
):229
–34
.24.
Hinkle
DE
, Wiersma
W
, Jurs
SG
Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences
Boston, Mass, London
Houghton Mifflin
. 2003
. [Hi Marketing] (distributor); [Cited 6 July 2022]. Available from: http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/50716608.html.25.
Remacle
A
, Morsomme
D
, Finck
C
. Comparison of vocal loading parameters in kindergarten and elementary school teachers
. J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2014
;57
(2
):406
–15
.26.
Szabo Portela
A
, Hammarberg
B
, Södersten
M
. Speaking fundamental frequency and phonation time during work and leisure time in vocally healthy preschool teachers measured with a voice accumulator
. Folia Phoniatr Logop
. 2013
;65
(2
):84
–90
.27.
Buckley
KL
, O’Halloran
PD
, Oates
JM
. Occupational vocal health of elite sports coaches: an exploratory pilot study of football coaches
. J Voice
. 2015
;29
(4
):476
–83
.28.
Brumm
H
, Zollinger
SA
. The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research
. Beyond Behav
. 2011
148
11–13
1173
98
.29.
Franca
MC
, Wagner
JF
. Effects of vocal demands on voice performance of student singers
. J Voice
. 2015
;29
(3
):324
–32
.30.
Debruyne
F
, Buekers
R
. Interdependency between intensity and pitch in the normal speaking voice
. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Belg
. 1998
;52
(3
):201
–5
.31.
Noble
W
, Gatehouse
S
. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ): efectos de la adaptación uni o bilateral de auxiliares auditivos en las habilidades medidas la escala de cualidades auditiva, espacial y del lenguaje (SSQ)
. Int J Audiol
. 2006
;45
(3
):172
–81
.32.
Pennini
PTM
, Almeida
K
Speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale in assessing the benefit in hearing aid users
. CoDAS
. 2021
[citato 17 gennaio 2023]. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/j/codas/a/fFRyYhxQNXZ9qqF7TCZZw7n/citation/?lang=en.33.
Maruthy
M
, Maruthy
S
, Kumar
UA
, Gnanateja
GN
. Auditory and cognitive attributes of hearing aid acclimatization in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss
. Am J Audiol
. 2019
28
S2
460
71
.34.
Cox
RM
, Alexander
GC
. The international Outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version
. Int J Audiol
. 2002
;41
(1
):30
–5
.35.
Holman
JA
, Drummond
A
, Naylor
G
. Hearing aids reduce daily-life fatigue and increase social activity: a longitudinal study
. Trends Hear
. 2021
;25
:23312165211052786
.36.
Fisher
DE
, Li
CM
, Hoffman
HJ
, Chiu
MS
, Themann
CL
, Petersen
H
et al. Sex-specific predictors of hearing-aid use in older persons: the age, gene/environment susceptibility: reykjavik study
. Int J Audiol
. 2015
;54
(9
):634
–41
.37.
Sawyer
CS
, Armitage
CJ
, Munro
KJ
, Singh
G
, Dawes
PD
. Correlates of hearing aid use in UK adults: self-reported hearing difficulties, social participation, living situation, health, and demographics
. Ear Hear
. 2019
;40
(5
):1061
–8
.38.
Most
T
, Adi-Bensaid
L
, Shpak
T
, Sharkiya
S
, Luntz
M
. Everyday hearing functioning in unilateral versus bilateral hearing aid users
. Am J Otolaryngol
. 2012
;33
(2
):205
–11
.39.
Banh
J
, Singh
G
, Pichora-Fuller
MK
. Age affects responses on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss
. J Am Acad Audiol
. 2012
;23
(2
):081
–91
; quiz 139-40.40.
Bottalico
P
, Ipsaro Passione
I
, Astolfi
A
, Carullo
A
, Hunter
EJ
. Accuracy of the quantities measured by four vocal dosimeters and its uncertainty
. J Acoust Soc Am
. 2018
;143
(3
):1591
–602
.© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2023
You do not currently have access to this content.
