Background: The role of prosody in language acquisition and effective communication is documented in research. Nevertheless, rehabilitation of prosodic skills in children with hearing impairment using hearing aids or cochlear implants is relatively neglected compared to other speech and language areas. Objective: To detect the effect of prosodic rehabilitation using the adapted translated version of the “Prosody Treatment Program” on expression of prosodic features in Egyptian Arabic-speaking hearing-impaired school-age children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implant devices in comparison to conventional auditory and language rehabilitation. Methods: This study was conducted on 34 children with sensorineural hearing loss in a randomized controlled trial design. Children were randomly divided into 2 groups, group A (cases) and group B (control), by block randomization. Both groups were initially evaluated for their prosodic skills using objective measures. Group A received rehabilitation for prosody using the Prosody Treatment Program for 1 h, once per week for 3 months, while group B received conventional auditory and language training and served as their control. Both groups were re-evaluated using the same protocol after 3 months of therapy. Results: A statistically significant improvement of most of the assessed prosodic parameters in group A was shown when comparing the pretherapy and posttherapy scores, as well as comparing between both studied groups after therapy. Conclusions: Prosody is amenable to motor learning. The Prosody Treatment Program seems to be an effective rehabilitation tool in improving some prosodic skills of hearing-impaired children. Prosodic rehabilitation showed superiority to conventional auditory and language training in improving the expression of some prosodic features and pragmatic language skills.

1.
Kent
RD
,
Kim
Y
. Acoustic analysis of speech. In:
Ball
MJ
,
Perkins
MR
,
Müller
N
,
Howard
S
, editors
.
The Handbook of clinical linguistics
.
United States
:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
;
2008
. pp.
360
80
.
2.
Couper-Kuhlen
E
.
An introduction to english prosody
.
London
:
Edward Arnold
;
1986
.
3.
Patel
R
,
Brayton
JT
.
Identifying prosodic contrasts in utterances produced by 4-, 7-, and 11-year-old children
.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
.
2009
Jun
;
52
(
3
):
790
801
.
[PubMed]
1092-4388
4.
Vandali
AE
,
Whitford
LA
,
Plant
KL
,
Clark
GM
.
Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system
.
Ear Hear
.
2000
Dec
;
21
(
6
):
608
24
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
5.
Gordon
RG
. Ethnologue, Languages of the World. ethnologue
2005
. Available from: http://www.ethnologue.com/. [Accessed in: Feb, 2020].
6.
Watson
JC
.
The Phonology and Morphology of Arabic
.
Oxford University Press
;
2002
.
7.
Peppé
SJ
.
Why is prosody in speech-language pathology so difficult?
Int J Speech Lang Pathol
.
2009
;
11
(
4
):
258
71
. 1754-9507
8.
Mary
L
. Significance of Prosody for Speaker, Language, Emotion, and Speech Recognition. In:
Mary
L
, editor
.
Extraction of Prosody for Automatic Speaker, Language, Emotion and Speech Recognition
.
Cham
:
Springer International Publishing
;
2019
. pp.
1
22
.
9.
Segal
O
,
Kishon-Rabin
L
.
Influence of the native language on sensitivity to lexical stress: evidence from native arabic and hebrew speakers
.
Stud Second Lang Acquis
.
2018
;
41
(
1
):
151
78
. 0272-2631
10.
Anani
M
.
The Effect of the Arabic Syllabic Prosodic Features on the Production of English CV Sequences
.
Int J Engl Lang Educ.
2013
;
1
(
1
):
222
60
. 2325-0887
11.
Anis
I
.
Linguistic sounds
.
Cairo
:
Anglo-Egyptian Library
;
2007
. pp.
145
67
.
12.
McCarthy
J
,
Prince
A
.
Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology.
Perspectives on Arabic linguistics II: papers from the second annual symposium on Arabic linguistics: John Benjamins Amsterdam;
1990
. p. 1-54.
13.
Hassanin
SE
.
Arabic acoustics.
Elfekr ElAraby publishing;
2011
. p. 126-54.
14.
Gussenhoven
C
.
The phonology of tone and intonation
.
United Kingdom
:
Cambridge University Press
;
2004
.
15.
Fletcher
J
. The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. In:
Hardcastle
WJ
,
Laver
J
,
Gibbon
FE
, editors
.
The handbook of phonetic sciences
. 2nd ed.
Singapore
:
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
;
2010
. pp.
521
602
.
16.
Chin
SB
,
Bergeson
TR
,
Phan
J
.
Speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants
.
J Commun Disord
.
2012
Sep-Oct
;
45
(
5
):
355
66
.
[PubMed]
0021-9924
17.
Cannon
SA
,
Chatterjee
M
.
Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss
.
Ear Hear
.
2019
May/Jun
;
40
(
3
):
477
92
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
18.
Harkins
JE
,
Bakke
M
. Technologies for communication: Status and trends. In:
Marschark
M
,
Spencer
PE
, editors
.
Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education
.
New York
:
Oxford University Press
;
2011
. pp.
425
38
.
19.
Huang
YT
,
Newman
RS
,
Catalano
A
,
Goupell
MJ
.
Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners
.
Cognition
.
2017
Sep
;
166
:
184
200
.
[PubMed]
0010-0277
20.
Marx
M
,
James
C
,
Foxton
J
,
Capber
A
,
Fraysse
B
,
Barone
P
, et al.
Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing
.
Ear Hear
.
2015
Mar-Apr
;
36
(
2
):
239
48
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
21.
VAN DE Velde
DJ
,
Schiller
NO
,
Levelt
CC
,
VAN Heuven
VJ
,
Beers
M
,
Briaire
JJ
, et al.
Prosody perception and production by children with cochlear implants
.
J Child Lang
.
2019
Jan
;
46
(
1
):
111
41
.
[PubMed]
0305-0009
22.
Campisi
P
,
Low
A
,
Papsin
B
,
Mount
R
,
Cohen-Kerem
R
,
Harrison
R
.
Acoustic analysis of the voice in pediatric cochlear implant recipients: a longitudinal study
.
Laryngoscope
.
2005
Jun
;
115
(
6
):
1046
50
.
[PubMed]
0023-852X
23.
Hocevar-Boltezar
I
,
Radsel
Z
,
Vatovec
J
,
Geczy
B
,
Cernelc
S
,
Gros
A
, et al.
Change of phonation control after cochlear implantation
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2006
Jun
;
27
(
4
):
499
503
.
[PubMed]
1531-7129
24.
Peng
SC
,
Tomblin
JB
,
Turner
CW
.
Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing
.
Ear Hear
.
2008
Jun
;
29
(
3
):
336
51
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
25.
Klieve
S
,
Jeanes
R
.
Perception of prosodic features by children with cochlear implants: is it sufficient for understanding meaning differences in language?
Deafness Educ Int
.
2001
;
3
(
1
):
15
37
. 1464-3154
26.
Bellon-Harn
ML
,
Harn
WE
,
Watson
GD
.
Targeting prosody in an eight-year-old child with high-functioning autism during an interactive approach to therapy
.
Child Lang Teach Ther
.
2007
;
23
(
2
):
157
79
. 0265-6590
27.
Prieto
P
,
Esteve-Gibert
N
.
The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition
.
Amsterdam
:
John Benjamins
;
2018
. pp.
18
100
.
28.
Filippi
P
,
Gingras
B
,
Fitch
WT
.
Pitch enhancement facilitates word learning across visual contexts
.
Front Psychol
.
2014
Dec
;
5
:
1468
.
[PubMed]
1664-1078
29.
van Wieringen
A
,
Wouters
J
.
What can we expect of normally-developing children implanted at a young age with respect to their auditory, linguistic and cognitive skills?
Hear Res
.
2015
Apr
;
322
:
171
9
.
[PubMed]
0378-5955
30.
Soleymani
Z
,
Mahmoodabadi
N
,
Nouri
MM
.
Language skills and phonological awareness in children with cochlear implants and normal hearing
.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
.
2016
Apr
;
83
:
16
21
.
[PubMed]
0165-5876
31.
Kronenberger
WG
,
Pisoni
DB
,
Harris
MS
,
Hoen
HM
,
Xu
H
,
Miyamoto
RT
.
Profiles of verbal working memory growth predict speech and language development in children with cochlear implants
.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
.
2013
Jun
;
56
(
3
):
805
25
.
[PubMed]
1092-4388
32.
Pisoni
D
,
Kronenberger
W
,
Roman
A
,
Geers
A
.
Article 7: measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children following more than 10 years of cochlear implantation
.
Ear Hear
.
2011
;
32
(
1
):
60s
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
33.
Sarant
J
,
Harris
D
,
Bennet
L
,
Bant
S
.
Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: a study of spoken language outcomes
.
Ear Hear
.
2014
Jul-Aug
;
35
(
4
):
396
409
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
34.
Park
M
,
Song
J-J
,
Oh
SJ
,
Shin
M-S
,
Lee
JH
,
Oh
SH
.
The relation between nonverbal IQ and postoperative CI outcomes in cochlear implant users: preliminary result.
Biomed Res Int.
2015
;2015.
35.
Geers
AE
,
Nicholas
JG
,
Moog
JS
.
Estimating the influence of cochlear implantation on language development in children
.
Audiol Med
.
2007
;
5
(
4
):
262
73
.
[PubMed]
1651-386X
36.
Lyxell
B
,
Wass
M
,
Sahlén
B
,
Samuelsson
C
,
Asker-Arnason
L
,
Ibertsson
T
, et al.
Cognitive development, reading and prosodic skills in children with cochlear implants
.
Scand J Psychol
.
2009
Oct
;
50
(
5
):
463
74
.
[PubMed]
0036-5564
37.
Phillips
J
,
Wiley
S
,
Barnard
H
,
Meinzen-Derr
J
.
Comparison of two nonverbal intelligence tests among children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing
.
Res Dev Disabil
.
2014
Feb
;
35
(
2
):
463
71
.
[PubMed]
0891-4222
38.
Torppa
R
,
Faulkner
A
,
Laasonen
M
,
Lipsanen
J
,
Sammler
D
.
Links of prosodic stress perception and musical activities to language skills of children with cochlear implants and normal hearing
.
Ear Hear
.
2020
Mar/Apr
;
41
(
2
):
395
410
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
39.
Rothstein
JA
. Prosody Treatment Program. linguisystems;
2013
. 98.
40.
Albert
ML
,
Sparks
RW
,
Helm
NA
.
Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia
.
Arch Neurol
.
1973
Aug
;
29
(
2
):
130
1
.
[PubMed]
0003-9942
41.
Ramig
LO
,
Pawlas
AA
,
Countryman
S
.
The Lee Silverman Voice Treatment: A practical guide for treating the voice and speech disorders in Parkinson disease. Salt Lake
.
National Center for Voice and Speech
;
1995
.
42.
Strand
EA
,
Stoeckel
R
,
Baas
B
.
Treatment of Severe Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Treatment Efficacy Study
.
J Med Speech-Lang Pathol
.
2006
;
14
(
4
):
297
307
.1065-1438
43.
ElHakeem
ES
.
Formulation of a protocol for prosodic evaluation in egyptian adults with communication disorders.
PhD Thesis. Faculty of Medicine: Alexandria University
2016
.
44.
Kotby
MN
,
Khairy
A
,
Baraka
M
,
Rifaie
N
,
El Shobary
A
, editors
.
Language testing of Arabic speaking children.
Proceeding of the XXIII World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics
;
1995
.
45.
Melika
L
. Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. 4th (Arabic version) ed. Cairo: Victor Kiorlos Publishing;
1998
.
46.
Peppé
S
,
McCann
J
.
Assessing intonation and prosody in children with atypical language development: the PEPS-C test and the revised version
.
Clin Linguist Phon
.
2003
Jun-Aug
;
17
(
4-5
):
345
54
.
[PubMed]
0269-9206
47.
Kalathottukaren
RT
,
Purdy
SC
,
Ballard
E
.
Prosody Perception and Production in Children with Hearing Loss and Age- and Gender-Matched Controls
.
J Am Acad Audiol
.
2017
Apr
;
28
(
4
):
283
94
.
[PubMed]
1050-0545
48.
Chari
DA
,
Barrett
KC
,
Patel
AD
,
Colgrove
TR
,
Jiradejvong
P
,
Jacobs
LY
, et al.
Impact of Auditory-Motor Musical Training on Melodic Pattern Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2020
Apr
;
41
(
4
):
e422
31
.
[PubMed]
1531-7129
49.
Stropahl
M
,
Besser
J
,
Launer
S
.
Auditory Training Supports Auditory Rehabilitation: A State-of-the-Art Review
.
Ear Hear
.
2020
Jul/Aug
;
41
(
4
):
697
704
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
50.
Hargrove
PM
,
McGarr
NS
.
A transdisciplinary model for prosody applied to the teaching of clinical populations.
Lund, Sweden
:
ESCA Workshop on Prosody
;
1993
.
51.
Stratton
WD
.
Intonation feedback for the deaf through a tactile display
.
Volta Review
.
1974
;
76
:
26
35
.0042-8639
52.
Ryalls
J
.
Speech therapy for lowering vocal fundamental frequency in two adolescents with hearing impairments: A comparison with and without SpeechViewer
.
Volta Review
.
1995
;
97
(
4
):
243
9
.0042-8639
53.
O’Halpin
R
.
An auditory and acoustic analysis of contrastive stress in profoundly deaf children follovving training
.
Child Lang Teach Ther
.
1993
;
9
(
1
):
45
67
. 0265-6590
54.
Holt
CM
,
Dowell
RC
.
Actor vocal training for the habilitation of speech in adolescent users of cochlear implants
.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ
.
2011
;
16
(
1
):
140
51
.
[PubMed]
1081-4159
55.
Stathopoulos
ET
,
Duchan
JF
,
Sonnenmeier
RM
,
Bruce
NV
.
Intonation and pausing in deaf speech
.
Folia Phoniatr Logop
.
1986
;
38
(
1
):
1
12
.
[PubMed]
1421-9972
56.
Boone
D
.
Modification of the voices of deaf children
.
Volta Review
.
1966
;
68
:
686
92
.0042-8639
57.
Dwyer
C
.
The effect of increasing speaking rate on acoustic and perceptual measures of nasality in hearing impaired speakers.
Master Thesis: University of Canterbury;
2007
.
58.
Lee
KY
,
van Hasselt
CA
,
Tong
MC
.
Age sensitivity in the acquisition of lexical tone production: evidence from children with profound congenital hearing impairment after cochlear implantation
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
.
2010
Apr
;
119
(
4
):
258
65
.
[PubMed]
0003-4894
59.
Snow
DP
,
Ertmer
DJ
.
The development of falling intonation in young children with cochlear implants: a 2-year longitudinal study
.
Clin Linguist Phon
.
2013
Jul
;
27
(
6-7
):
447
58
.
[PubMed]
0269-9206
60.
Gerken
L
,
McGregor
K
.
An overview of prosody and its role in normal and disordered child language
.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol
.
1998
;
7
(
2
):
38
48
. 1058-0360
61.
de Carvalho
A
,
Dautriche
I
,
Millotte
S
,
Christophe
A
. Early perception of phrasal prosody and its role in syntactic and lexical acquisition. In:
Prieto
P
,
Esteve-Gibert
N
, editors
.
The development of prosody in first language acquisition. 23
.
Amsterdam
:
John Benjamins Publishing Company
;
2018
. pp.
17
35
.
62.
Ling
D
.
Foundations of spoken language for hearing impaired child, Alexander Graham Bell Association for the deaf
.
Washington
:
Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf
;
1989
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.