Introduction: Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech-Communication (PEPS-C) is a computerised test for assessing the abilities to understand and use speech prosody in communication. It has been used to obtain a profile of strengths and weaknesses in different prosodic forms and functions for different clinical populations (e.g., autism spectrum disorders, Down syndrome) and second language learners. The 2015 edition of PEPS-C incorporates four new subtests addressing the understanding and production of lexical stress and phrasal stress, and collapses four form subtests (Intonation/Short-Item Input and Output, Prosody/Long-Item Input and Output) into two (Discrimination, Imitation). However, the suitability of these new tasks has not been reported in any published studies, although they are likely to be relevant for learners of English. Moreover, the present authors update the Irish English (IE) version of PEPS-C to the 2015 edition for another research project on prosodic skills in children with spina bifida. Hence, this paper reports the making of PEPS-C 2015 (IE) and examines the usefulness of this test in assessing a group of non-native speakers of English, as compared to a group of native speakers of IE. Methods: PEPS-C 2015 for Irish English was developed by adapting the test items of the UK English version of the test. The PEPS-C 2015 (IE) was then trialled on 25 native speakers of Irish English and 10 Spanish speakers who speak English as a second language (ESL). Results: All native speakers of Irish English showed competence (scored ≥75% correct) in the comprehension and expression of prosodic form and functions assessed. For the ESL speakers, the test identified two areas of possible difficulty for this group: Phrase Stress Comprehension and Expression, and Contrastive Stress Comprehension. Conclusion: The PEPS-C 2015, with its extra stress tasks, might therefore be useful as a prosody assessment tool for ESL speakers, particularly those with a Romance first language or at an early stage of learning, but further research is needed.

1.
Cruttenden
A
.
Intonation
. 2nd ed.
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
;
1997
.
2.
Couper-Kuhlen
E
.
An introduction to English prosody
.
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
;
1986
.
3.
Crystal
D
.
Prosodic systems and intonation in English
.
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
;
1969
.
4.
Halliday
MA
.
Intonation and grammar in British English
.
The Hague
:
Mouton
;
1967
.
5.
O’Connor
JD
,
Arnold
GF
.
Intonation of colloquial English
. 2nd ed.
London
:
Longman
;
1973
.
6.
Roach
P
.
English phonetics and phonology: A practical course
.
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
;
2000
.
7.
Stojanovik
V
,
Setter
J
, editors
.
Speech prosody in atypical populations: Assessment and remediation
.
Guildford, Surrey
:
J&R Press Ltd
;
2011
.
8.
Duffy
JR
.
Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management
. 3rd ed.
St. Louis (MO)
:
Elsevier Mosby
;
2013
.
9.
Kim
J
,
Lantolf
JP
.
Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction
.
Lang Teach Res
.
2016
;
•••
:
1
22
.;
Advance online publication
.1362-1688
10.
Setter
J
,
Stojanovik
V
,
Martínez-Castilla
P
.
Evaluating the intonation of non-native speakers of English using a computerized test battery
.
Int J Appl Linguist
.
2010
;
20
(
3
):
368
85
. 0802-6106
11.
Crystal
D
.
Profiling linguistic disability
.
London
:
Edward Arnold
;
1982
.
12.
Shriberg
LD
,
Kwiatkowski
J
,
Rasmussen
C
.
The Prosody-Voice Screening Profile
.
Tucson (AZ)
:
Communication Skill Builders
;
1990
.
13.
Beckman
ME
,
Pierrehumbert
JB
.
Intonational structure in Japanese and English
.
Phonology Yearbook.
1986
;
3
:
255
309
.
14.
Hargrove
PM
,
McGarr
NS
.
Prosody management of communication disorders
.
San Diego
:
Singular Publishing Group
;
1994
.
15.
Chapman
M
.
Theory and practice of teaching discourse intonation
.
ELT J
.
2007
;
61
(
1
):
3
11
. 0951-0893
16.
Underhill
A
.
Sound foundations: Learning and teaching pronunciation
.
Oxford
:
Macmillan
;
2005
.
17.
Peppé
SJ
,
Martínez-Castilla
P
,
Coene
M
,
Hesling
I
,
Moen
I
,
Gibbon
FE
.
Assessing prosodic skills in five European languages: cross-linguistic differences in typical and atypical populations
.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol
.
2010
Feb
;
12
(
1
):
1
7
.
[PubMed]
1754-9507
18.
Peppé
S
. Investigating linguistic prosodic ability in adult speakers of English [doctoral thesis]. London: University College London;
1998
. 359 p.
19.
Peppé
S
,
Maxim
J
,
Wells
B
.
Prosodic variation in southern British English
.
Lang Speech
.
2000
Jul-Sep
;
43
(
Pt 3
):
309
34
.
[PubMed]
0023-8309
20.
Peppé
S
,
McCann
J
.
Assessing intonation and prosody in children with atypical language development: the PEPS-C test and the revised version
.
Clin Linguist Phon
.
2003
Jun-Aug
;
17
(
4-5
):
345
54
.
[PubMed]
0269-9206
21.
Peppé
S
,
McCann
J
,
Gibbon
F
,
O’Hare
A
,
Rutherford
M
.
Assessing prosodic and pragmatic ability in children with high-functioning autism
.
J Pragmatics
.
2006
;
38
(
10
):
1776
91
. 0378-2166
22.
Cutler
A
,
Swinney
DA
.
Prosody and the development of comprehension
.
J Child Lang
.
1987
Feb
;
14
(
1
):
145
67
.
[PubMed]
0305-0009
23.
Cruttenden
A
.
Intonation comprehension in ten-year-olds
.
J Child Lang
.
1985
;
12
(
3
):
643
61
. 0305-0009
24.
Crystal
D
.
Clinical linguistics
. 2nd ed.
London
:
Edward Arnold
;
1987
.
25.
Vihman
MM
.
Phonological development: The origins of language in the child
.
Oxford
:
Basil Blackwell
;
1996
.
26.
Wells
B
,
Peppé
S
,
Goulandris
N
.
Intonation development from five to thirteen
.
J Child Lang
.
2004
Nov
;
31
(
4
):
749
78
.
[PubMed]
0305-0009
27.
Foley
M
,
Gibbon
FE
,
Peppé
S
. Benchmarking typically developing children's prosodic performance on the Irish-English version of the Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech-Communication (PEPS-C). J Clin Speech Lang Stud.
2011
;18:19-40.
28.
Gibbon
FE
,
Smyth
H
.
Preschool children’s performance on Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech-Communication (PEPS-C)
.
Clin Linguist Phon
.
2013
Jul
;
27
(
6-7
):
428
34
.
[PubMed]
0269-9206
29.
Peppé
S
,
Cleland
J
,
Gibbon
F
,
O’Hare
A
,
Martínez-Castilla
P
.
Expressive prosody in children with autism spectrum conditions
.
J Neurolinguist
.
2011
;
24
(
1
):
41
53
. 0911-6044
30.
Diehl
JJ
,
Paul
R
.
Acoustic differences in the imitation of prosodic patterns in children with autism spectrum disorders
.
Res Autism Spectr Disord
.
2012
Jan
;
6
(
1
):
123
34
.
[PubMed]
1750-9467
31.
Diehl
JJ
,
Paul
R
.
Acoustic and perceptual measurements of prosody production on the profiling elements of prosodic systems in children by children with autism spectrum disorders
.
Appl Psycholinguist
.
2013
;
34
(
1
):
135
61
. 0142-7164
32.
Peppé
S
,
McCann
J
,
Gibbon
F
,
O’Hare
A
,
Rutherford
M
.
Receptive and expressive prosodic ability in children with high-functioning autism
.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
.
2007
Aug
;
50
(
4
):
1015
28
.
[PubMed]
1092-4388
33.
Järvinen-Pasley
A
,
Peppé
S
,
King-Smith
G
,
Heaton
P
.
The relationship between form and function level receptive prosodic abilities in autism
.
J Autism Dev Disord
.
2008
Aug
;
38
(
7
):
1328
40
.
[PubMed]
0162-3257
34.
Stojanovik
V
.
Understanding and production of prosody in children with Williams syndrome: A developmental trajectory approach
.
J Neurolinguist
.
2010
;
23
(
2
):
112
26
. 0911-6044
35.
Martinez-Castilla
P
,
Sotillo
M
,
Campos
R
.
Prosodic abilities of Spanish-speaking adolescents and adults with Williams syndrome
.
Lang Cogn Process
.
2011
;
26
(
8
):
1055
82
. 0169-0965
36.
Martinez-Castilla
P
,
Stojanovik
V
,
Setter
J
,
Sotillo
M
.
Prosodic abilities in Spanish and English children with Williams syndrome: A cross-linguistic study
.
Appl Psycholinguist
.
2012
;
33
(
1
):
1
22
. 0142-7164
37.
Setter
J
,
Stojanovik
V
,
Van Ewijk
L
,
Moreland
M
.
Affective prosody in children with Williams syndrome
.
Clin Linguist Phon
.
2007
Sep
;
21
(
9
):
659
72
.
[PubMed]
0269-9206
38.
Catterall
C
,
Howard
S
,
Stojanovik
V
,
Szczerbinski
M
,
Wells
B
.
Investigating prosodic ability in Williams syndrome
.
Clin Linguist Phon
.
2006
Sep-Oct
;
20
(
7-8
):
531
8
.
[PubMed]
0269-9206
39.
Stojanovik
V
.
Prosodic deficits in children with Down syndrome
.
J Neurolinguist
.
2011
;
24
(
2
):
145
55
. 0911-6044
40.
Wells
B
,
Peppé
S
.
Intonation abilities of children with speech and language impairments
.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
.
2003
Feb
;
46
(
1
):
5
20
.
[PubMed]
1092-4388
41.
Lee
A
,
Hayes
O
,
Ní Mhurchú
D
,
Gibbon
FE
. A preliminary study of prosody skills in children with spina bifida. In:
Enger
HO
,
Knoph
MI
,
Kristoffersen
KE
,
Lind
M
, editors
.
Helt fabelaktig! Festskrift til Hanne Gram Simonsen på 70-årsdagen
[
Absolutely fabulous! Festschrift to Hanne Gram Simonsen on the 70th birthday
]
Oslo
:
Novus Forlag
;
2016
. pp.
111
25
.
42.
Kalathottukaren
RT
,
Purdy
SC
,
Ballard
E
.
Prosody perception and production in children with hearing loss and age- and gender-matched controls
.
J Am Acad Audiol
.
2017
Apr
;
28
(
4
):
283
94
.
[PubMed]
1050-0545
43.
Kalathottukaren
RT
,
Purdy
SC
,
Ballard
E
.
Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants
.
Int J Audiol
.
2015
Jul
;
54
(
7
):
444
52
.
[PubMed]
1499-2027
44.
Frota
S
,
Prieto
P
.
Intonation in Romance
.
Oxford
:
Oxford University Press
;
2015
.
45.
Swerts
M
.
Contrast and accent in Dutch and Romanian
.
J Phonetics
.
2007
;
35
(
3
):
380
97
. 0095-4470
46.
Vander Klok
J
,
Goad
H
,
Wagner
M
.
Prosodic focus in English vs. French: A scope account
.
Glossa: J Gen Linguist.
2018
;
3
(
1
):
1
47
.
47.
Martínez-Castilla
P
,
Peppé
S
.
Cross-linguistic expression of contrastive accent: clinical assessment in Spanish and English
.
Clin Linguist Phon
.
2010
Nov
;
24
(
11
):
955
62
.
[PubMed]
0269-9206
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.