Abstract
Introduction: Noise in the school environment has been a major concern in many countries around the world. Students need a favorable signal-to-noise ratio in the classroom to ensure adequate speech intelligibility, which is directly dependent on the acoustics of the classroom and favorable noise levels in these environments. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of physical, organizational, and educational interventions to achieve noise reduction in a school. Methods: Presentations on the effects of noise were made to school administrators, teachers, and students (educational activities), and also to the students’ families. Then, thermoacoustic treatment, changes in break times, equipment maintenance, and scheduling of students’ departure were applied. Sound pressure levels were measured before and after interventions for the unoccupied and occupied classroom conditions (n = 11 classrooms) and of the school’s outside areas (n = 4). Self-administered printed pre- and postintervention multiple-choice questionnaires were completed by the students in the classroom. Measures of the signal-to-noise ratio of the teachers’ voice before and after the interventions were also conducted (n = 3 classrooms). The interventions included installation of an acoustic ceiling, installation of air-conditioning, and replacement of the existing furniture with wood furniture. Results: Comparing the pre- and postintervention questionnaires, the Annoyance Index was reduced from 0.78 to 0.59. The tinnitus reported by the individuals increased significantly in the postintervention questionnaire (p < 0.001). Significant reductions in noise levels in both unoccupied and occupied classrooms were observed. There was also an improvement in the mean signal-to-noise ratio in the evaluated classrooms (n = 3) from +7.5 to +8.4 dB. Conclusion: Subjective measures and objective assessments demonstrated that both physical and educational interventions had a positive effect on short-term changes in habits and noise reduction in the school environment.
References
1.
Karabiber
Z
, Vallet
M
. Classroom acoustics policies – an overview.
Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Noise Control
. 2003
, Naples, Italy
.2.
Zannin
PH
, Marcon
CR
. Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms
. Appl Ergon
. 2007
Sep
;38
(5
):675
–80
.
[PubMed]
0003-68703.
Lesna
P
, Skrodzka
E
. Acoustic and Biomedical Engineering Subjective Evaluation of Classroom Acoustics by Teenagers vs. Reverberation Time
. Acta Phys Pol
. 2010
;118
(1
).0001-673X4.
Beck
DL
, Flexer
C
. Hearing is the Foundation of Listening and Listening is the Foudantion of Learning. In: Smaldino
JJ
, Flexer
C
, editors. Handbook of Acoustic Accessibility
. New York
: Thieme Medical Publishers
; 2012
. pp. 9
–17
.5.
Boothroyd
A
. Speech Perception in the Classroom. In: Smaldino
JJ
, Flexer
C
, editors. Handbook of Acoustic Accessibility
. New York
: Thieme Medical Publishers
; 2012
. pp. 18
–33
.6.
da Cruz
AD
, Alves Silvério
KC
, Da Costa
AR
, Moret
AL
, Lauris
JR
, de Souza Jacob
RT
. Evaluating effectiveness of dynamic soundfield system in the classroom
. Noise Health
. 2016
Jan-Feb
;18
(80
):42
–9
.
[PubMed]
1463-17417.
Crandell
CC
, Smaldino
JJ
. Classroom Acoustics for Children With Normal Hearing and With Hearing Impairment
. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch
. 2000
Oct
;31
(4
):362
–70
.
[PubMed]
0161-14618.
Osman
H
, Sullivan
JR
. Children’s auditory working memory performance in degraded listening conditions
. J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2014
Aug
;57
(4
):1503
–11
.
[PubMed]
1092-43889.
Cruz
AD
, Silvério
KC
, Ribeiro
VV
, Jacob
RT
. Dynamic soundfield system impact on the teacher’s voice: case report
. CEFAC
. 2016
;18
(5
):1260
–70
. 10.
Fernandes
JC
. Padronização das condições acústicas para salas de aula [Standardization of acoustic conditions for classrooms]. Proceedings of the 13th SIMPEP 2006
, Bauru, Brazil. Available from: http://www.simpep.feb.unesp.br/anais/anais_13/artigos/823.pdf11.
Oiticica
ML
. Interferência dos ventiladores na qualidade acústica das salas de aula da rede pública de ensino fundamental da cidade de Maceió-AL [Interference in the acoustic quality of classrooms of the public elementary school in the city of Maceió-AL]. Proceedings of the 26th ENEGEP 2006
, Fortaleza, Brazil. Available from: http://www.abepro.org.br/biblioteca/enegep2006_tr500335_7307.pdf12.
Chan
KM
, Li
CM
, Ma
EP
, Yiu
EM
, McPherson
B
. Noise levels in an urban Asian school environment
. Noise Health
. 2015
Jan-Feb
;17
(74
):48
–55
.
[PubMed]
1463-174113.
Dockrell
JE
, Shield
B
. Children’s perceptions of their acoustic environment at school and at home
. J Acoust Soc Am
. 2004
Jun
;115
(6
):2964
–73
.
[PubMed]
0001-496614.
Yebra
M
, Bleda
S
, Vera
J
. Necesidad de pautas y normativa acústica específicas en las construcciones escolares: La Universidad de Alicante, um ejemplo [Need for guidelines and specific acoustic regulations in school buildings: The University of Alicante, an example]. Proceedings of The International Forum Acusticum Sevilla 2003
, Sevilla, Spain. Available from: http://www.sea-acustica.es/fileadmin/publicaciones/Sevilla02_rba08005.pdf15.
Dreossi
RC
, Momensohn-Santos
TO
. Ruído e sua interferência sobre estudantes em uma sala de aula: revisão de literatura
. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica, Barueri (SP)
. 2005
;17
(2
):251
–8
. 16.
Sundaravadhanan
G
, Selvarajan
HG
, McPherson
B
. Classroom Listening Conditions in Indian Primary Schools: A Survey of Four Schools
. Noise Health
. 2017
Jan-Feb
;19
(86
):31
–40
.
[PubMed]
1463-174117.
Nedojedlá
P
, Kollárová
H
, Azeem
K
, Mrázková
E
, Jiřík
V
, Vojkovská
K
, et al. A study evaluating noise levels at selected schools in the Czech Republic
. Cent Eur J Public Health
. 2018
Dec
;26
(4
):316
–20
.
[PubMed]
1210-777818.
Ali
AA
. Study effects of school noise on learning achievement and annoyance in Assiut city, Egypt
. Appl Acoust
. 2013
;74
(4
):602
–6
. 0003-682X19.
Kristiansen
J
, Lund
SP
, Persson
R
, Challi
R
, Lindskov
JM
, Nielsen
PM
, et al. The effects of acoustical refurbishment of classrooms on teachers’ perceived noise exposure and noise-related health symptoms
. Int Arch Occup Environ Health
. 2016
Feb
;89
(2
):341
–50
.
[PubMed]
0340-013120.
Pirilä
S
, Jokitulppo
J
, Niemitalo-Haapola
E
, Yliherva
A
, Rantala
L
. Teacher’s and children’s experiences after an acoustic intervention and a noise-controlling workshop in two elementary classrooms
. Folia Phoniatr Logop
. 2019
Oct
;•••
:1
–10
.
[PubMed]
1021-776221.
Minichilli
F
, Gorini
F
, Ascari
E
, Bianchi
F
, Coi
A
, Fredianelli
L
, et al. Annoyance judgment and measurements of environmental noise: a focus on Italian secondary schools
. Int J Environ Res Public Health
. 2018
Jan
;15
(2
):208
.
[PubMed]
1661-782722.
Gomes
RF
, Samelli
AG
, Bistafa
SR
. Earmuff efficacy in the workplace using F-MIRE – a case report
. Int J Occup Saf Ergonomics
; 2017
. 23.
Bistafa
SR
. Acústica aplicada ao controle do ruído
[Acoustics applied to noise control
]2nd ed. São Paulo
: Blucher
; 2011
.24.
Markides
A
. Speech levels and speech-to-noise ratios
. Br J Audiol
. 1986
May
;20
(2
):115
–20
.
[PubMed]
0300-536425.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)
. Classroom Acoustics
(2004
). Available from: http://www.asha.org/public/hearing/American-National-Standard-on-Classroom-Acoustics/ Shaw T. Sound assurance. Proceedings of the First International Virtual Conference on FM 2010; 56-65.26.
Shaw T. Sound assurance. Proceedings of the First International Virtual Conference on FM 2010.pp. 56–65.
27.
Babisch
W
, Swart
W
, Houthuijs
D
, Selander
J
, Bluhm
G
, Pershagen
G
, et al. Exposure modifiers of the relationships of transportation noise with high blood pressure and noise annoyance
. J Acoust Soc Am
. 2012
Dec
;132
(6
):3788
–808
.
[PubMed]
0001-496628.
Christidou
V
, Dimitriou
A
, Barkas
N
, Papadopoulou
M
, Grammenos
S.
“Young noise researchers”: an intervention to promote noise awareness in preschool children. JBSE 2015
; 14(5).29.
Savastano
M
, Marioni
G
, de Filippis
C
. Tinnitus in children without hearing impairment
. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
. 2009
Dec
;73
Suppl 1
:S13
–5
.
[PubMed]
0165-587630.
NBR 10152-1987: Níveis de ruído para conforto acústico [Noise levels for acoustic comfort]. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT), Rio de Janeiro,
1987
.31.
McCarty
P
, Rosen
L
. Acoustical Design - Basis of a Sound Education. J SP&M 2005
; A1-A7. Available from: http://classroomhearing.org/articles/SPM_Supp_Apr2005.pdf32.
Shield
B
, Greenland
E
, Dockrell
J
. Noise in open plan classrooms in primary schools: a review
. Noise Health
. 2010
Oct-Dec
;12
(49
):225
–34
.
[PubMed]
1463-174133.
Moreira
AC
, Gonçalves
CG
. The effectiveness of workshops in hearing health educational actions developed with workers exposed to noise
. CEFAC
. 2014
;16
(3
):723
–31
. 34.
Simons-Morton
B
. Health behavior in ecological context
. Health Educ Behav
. 2013
Feb
;40
(1
):6
–10
.
[PubMed]
1090-198135.
McLeroy
KR
, Bibeau
D
, Steckler
A
, Glanz
K
. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs
. Health Educ Q
. 1988
;15
(4
):351
–77
.
[PubMed]
0195-840236.
Welch
D
, Reddy
R
, Hand
J
, Devine
IM
. Educating teenagers about hearing health by training them to educate children
. Int J Audiol
. 2016
Sep
;55
(9
):499
–506
.
[PubMed]
1499-2027© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
2020
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
