Objectives: The present study investigated the articulatory contact pressure during the production of bilabial plosives by esophageal (ES), tracheoesophageal (TE), and laryngeal speakers. Methods: The peak contact pressure (PCP) during bilabial plosive production of /CVCVCVCVCV/ syllable strings of /p/ and /ph/ was obtained from 10 ES, 10 TE, and 10 laryngeal speakers of Cantonese. PCP values were obtained by using a pressure transduction system (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument) during speech production. Results: The results showed that ES speakers exhibited a significantly greater PCP value than TE and laryngeal speakers, as revealed by cheek muscle compression force. In addition, the unaspirated bilabial plosive /p/ was associated with a greater PCP than its aspirated counterpart /ph/. Conclusion: The current findings might support the hypothesis of over-exaggerated speech for better intelligibility among alaryngeal speakers. In addition, the increased oral muscular effort could be associated with a compensatory strategy for maintaining a high intraoral pressure or the unique air intake by ES speakers.

1.
Edels
Y
. Pseudo-voice: its theory and practice. In:
Edels
Y
, editor
.
Laryngectomy: Diagnosis to Rehabilitation
.
London
:
Croom-Helm
;
1983
. pp.
107
42
.
2.
Diedrich
WM
. Anatomy and physiology of esophageal speech. In:
Salmon
SJ
, editor
.
Alaryngeal Speech Rehabilitation
. 2nd ed.
Austin
:
Pro-Ed
;
1999
.
3.
Ng
ML
,
Kwok
CL
,
Chow
SF
.
Speech performance of adult cantonese-speaking laryngectomees using different types of alaryngeal phonation
.
J Voice
.
1997
Sep
;
11
(
3
):
338
44
.
[PubMed]
0892-1997
4.
Ng ML, Xiong MY. Chinese alaryngeal speech rehabilitation and their acoustical characteristics: a comprehensive review. Rehabil Med. 2015 Aug;25(2):29–34.
5.
Ng ML, Chan MW. Analyzing neoglottal vibration of Cantonese tracheoesophageal speech: preliminary aerodynamic study using inverse filtering. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012 Jul;64(6):283–9.
6.
Saito
M
,
Kinishi
M
,
Amatsu
M
;
Miki Saito, Minoru Kinishi, Mutsuo
.
Acoustic analyses clarify voiced-voiceless distinction in tracheoesophageal speech
.
Acta Otolaryngol
.
2000
Sep
;
120
(
6
):
771
7
.
[PubMed]
0001-6489
7.
Searl
JP
,
Reeves
IS
. Nonsurgical voice restoration following total laryngectomy. In:
Ward
WC
,
van As-Brooks
C
, editors
.
Head and neck cancer - Treatment, rehabilitation, and outcomes
.
San Diego
:
Plural Publishing
;
2007
. pp.
193
227
.
8.
Van Den Berg
J
,
Moolenaar-Bijl
AJ
.
Crico-pharyngeal sphincter, pitch, intensity and fluency in oesophageal speech
.
Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel)
.
1959
Jul
;
21
(
4
):
298
315
.
[PubMed]
0032-6305
9.
Ng
ML
.
Aerodynamic characteristics associated with oesophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese
.
Int J Speech-Language Pathol
.
2011
Apr
;
13
(
2
):
137
44
.
[PubMed]
1754-9507
10.
Robbins
J
,
Fisher
HB
,
Blom
EC
,
Singer
MI
.
A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production
.
J Speech Hear Disord
.
1984
May
;
49
(
2
):
202
10
.
[PubMed]
0022-4677
11.
Doyle
PC
,
Danhauer
JL
,
Reed
CG
.
Listeners’ perceptions of consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers
.
J Speech Hear Disord
.
1988
Nov
;
53
(
4
):
400
7
.
[PubMed]
0022-4677
12.
Motta
S
,
Galli
I
,
Di Rienzo
L
.
Aerodynamic findings in esophageal voice
.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2001
Jun
;
127
(
6
):
700
4
.
[PubMed]
0886-4470
13.
Ng ML, Gilbert HR, Lerman JW. Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel duration characteristics related to perception of Cantonese alaryngeal speech. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2001 Jan–Feb;53(1):36–47.
14.
Moon
JB
,
Weinberg
B
.
Aerodynamic and myoelastic contributions to tracheoesophageal voice production
.
J Speech Hear Res
.
1987
Sep
;
30
(
3
):
387
95
.
[PubMed]
0022-4685
15.
Searl
J
.
Bilabial contact pressure and oral air pressure during tracheoesophageal speech
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
.
2007
Apr
;
116
(
4
):
304
11
.
[PubMed]
0003-4894
16.
The 18th Executive Committee Report [Internet]. Hong Kong, The New Voice Club of Hong Kong; c
2018
[cited 2018 Jul 6]. Available from: http://www.newvoice.org.hk/images/stories/2017%20NVC%20booklet%202_jpg.pdf
17.
Hewitt
A
,
Hind
J
,
Kays
S
,
Nicosia
M
,
Doyle
J
,
Tompkins
W
, et al.
.
Standardized instrument for lingual pressure measurement
.
Dysphagia
.
2008
Mar
;
23
(
1
):
16
25
.
[PubMed]
0179-051X
18.
Neel
A
,
Palmer
P
,
Gass
C
.
Can IOPI be used to measure tongue pressure for speech sounds
.
J Med Speech-Lang Pathol
.
2008
;
16
(
4
):
235
41
.1065-1438
19.
Solomon
NP
,
Clark
HM
,
Makashay
MJ
,
Newman
LA
.
Assessment of orofacial strength in patients with dysarthria
.
J Med Speech Lang Pathol
.
2008
Dec
;
16
(
4
):
251
8
.
[PubMed]
1065-1438
20.
Adams
V
,
Mathisen
B
,
Baines
S
,
Lazarus
C
,
Callister
R
.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurements of tongue and hand strength and endurance using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI)
.
Dysphagia
.
2013
Sep
;
28
(
3
):
350
69
.
[PubMed]
0179-051X
21.
Clark
HM
,
Solomon
NP
.
Age and sex differences in orofacial strength
.
Dysphagia
.
2012
Mar
;
27
(
1
):
2
9
.
[PubMed]
0179-051X
22.
Searl
JP
,
Evitts
PM
.
Velopharyngeal aerodynamics of /m/ and /p/ in tracheoesophageal speech
.
J Voice
.
2004
Dec
;
18
(
4
):
557
66
.
[PubMed]
0892-1997
23.
Max
L
,
Steurs
W
,
de Bruyn
W
.
Vocal capacities in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers
.
Laryngoscope
.
1996
Jan
;
106
(
1 Pt 1
):
93
6
.
[PubMed]
0023-852X
You do not currently have access to this content.