Objective: To determine the effects of a phonological remediation reading and writing program in individuals with dyslexia, through behavioral and objective evaluations. Patients and Methods: Twenty children diagnosed with dyslexia, aged 8–14 years, were included in this study. Group I (GI) was composed of 10 children who took part in the program, and group II (GII) consisted of 10 subjects who did not take the remediation. The pre-testing evaluated phonological awareness, rapid naming, working memory, reading and writing of words and nonwords, thematic writing, and auditory evoked potential – P300. The type of stimulus used was the speech (20% of rare stimulus and 80% of frequent stimulus), intensity of 80 dBNa. The rare stimulus was the syllable /da/, and the frequent stimulus was the syllable /ba/. Next, the Phonological Reading and Writing Remediation Program was applied in 24 cumulative sessions, twice a week, each with a duration of 30 min. In the post-testing (at the end of the program), all the tests of the pre-testing were reapplied. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (between pre- and post-testing) in phonological awareness, rapid naming, working memory, thematic writing, writing and reading words and nonwords, as well as in the latency of the P3 component of P300 in GI, while GII maintained the same difficulties. Conclusion: The phonological remediation program showed to be a therapeutic method of fast beneficial effects in written language of individuals with dyslexia. However, the wide age range and the size of the sample could be considered a limitation of this study – it interferes with the generalization of results.

Lyon GR, Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA: Defining dyslexia, comorbidity, teachers’ knowledge of language and reading: a definition of dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia 2003; 53,1–14.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 5. Arlington, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
Wadsworth SJ, DeFries JC, Olson RK, Willcutt EG: Colorado longitudinal twin study of reading disability. Ann Dyslexia 2007; 57: 139–160.
Ziegler JC, Goswami U: Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull 2005; 131: 3–29.
Fisher SE, DeFries JC: Developmental dyslexia: genetic dissection of a complex cognitive trait. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 767–780.
Dennis MY, Paracchini S, Scerri TS, Prokunina-Olsson L, Knight JC, et al: A common variant associated with dyslexia reduces expression of the KIAA0319 gene. PLoS Genet DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000436.
Tzenova J, Kaplan BJ: Petryshen TL, Field LL: Confirmation of a dyslexia susceptibility locus on chromosome 1p34-p36 in a set of 100 Canadian families. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2004; 127: 117–124.
Wagner RK, Torgesen JK: The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychol Bull 1987; 101:192–212.
Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA: Dislexia (specific reading disability). Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57: 1301–1309.
Torgesen JK, Alexander AW, Wagner RK, Rashotte CA, Voeller KKS, Conway T: Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: immediate and longterm outcomes from two instructional approaches. J Learn Disabil 2001; 34: 33–58.
Salles JF, Parente MAM: Processos cognitivos na leitura de palavras em crianças: relações com compreensão e tempo de leitura. Psicol Reflex Crít 2002; 15: 321–331.
Swanson HL, Howard CB, Sáez L: Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? J Learn Disabil 2006; 39: 252–269.
Catts HW, Adlof SM, Hogan T, Weismer SE: Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48: 1378–1396.
Farquharson K, Centanni TM, Franzluebbers CE, Hogan TP: Phonological and lexical influences on phonological awareness in children with specific language impairment and dyslexia. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 838.
Gersons-Wolfensberger DC, Ruijssenaars WA: Definition and treatment of dyslexia: a report by the Committee on Dyslexia of the Health Council of The Netherlands. J Learn Disabil 1997; 30: 209–213.
Brambati SM, Termine C, Ruffino M, Danna M, Lanzi G, Stella G, et al: Neuropsychological deficits and neural dysfunction in familial dyslexia. Brain Res 2006; 1113: 174–185.
Moreau D, Waldie KE: Developmental learning disorders: from generic interventions to individualized remediation. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 2053.
Pammer K: Brain mechanisms and reading remediation: more questions than answers. Scientifica 2014; 1: 1–9.
Rayner K, Foorman BR, Perfetti CA, Pesetsky D, Seidenberg MS: How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychol Sci 2001; 2: 31–74.
Schulte-Körne G, Ludwig KU, El Sharkawy J, Nöthen MM, Müller-Myhsok B, Hoffman P: Genetics and neuroscience in dyslexia: perspectives for education and remediation. Mind Brain Educ 2007; 1: 162–172.
Eden GF, Moats L: The role of neuroscience in the remediation of students with dyslexia. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 1080–1084.
Ortiz MR, García AI, Guzmán R: Remedial interventions for children with reading disabilities: speech perception, an effective component in phonological training? J Learn Disabil 2002; 35: 334–342.
Germano GD, Capellini SA: Efficacy of an audio-visual computerized remediation program in students with dyslexia. Pro Fono 2008; 20: 237–242.
Silva C, Capellini SA: Efficacy of phonological intervention program in students at risk for dyslexia. CEFAC 2015; 17: 1827–1837.
Alvarenga KF, Araujo ES, Ferraz E, Crenitte PA: P300 auditory cognitive evoked potential as an indicator of therapeutical evolution in students with developmental dyslexia. CODAS 2013; 25: 500–505.
Alonso R, Schochat E: The efficacy of formal auditory training in children with (central) auditory processing disorder: behavioral and electrophysiological evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 75: 726–732.
Anderson NE, Baldridge RM, Stanford MS: P3a amplitude predicts successful treatment program completion in substance-dependent individuals. Subst Use Misuse 2011; 46: 669–677.
Mendonca EB, Muniz LF, Leal MD, Diniz AD: Applicability of the P300 frequency pattern test to assess auditory processing. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2013;79: 512–521.
Jirsa RE: Clinical efficacy of eletrophysiologic measures in APD management programs. Semin Hear 2002; 23: 349–355.
Musiek FE, Lee WW: Potenciais auditivos de média e longa latência; in Musiek FE, Rintelmann WF (eds): Perspectivas atuais em avaliação auditiva. Barueri, Manole, 2001, vol 1, pp 239–267.
Papagiannopoulou EA, Lagopoulos J: Resting state EEG hemispheric power asymmetry in children with dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia DOI 10.1007/s11881-016-0122-6
Maciejewska B, Wiskirska-Woznica B, Swidzinski P, Michalak M: Assessing auditory processing disorders in children with developmental dyslexia using auditory cognitive event-related potentials. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2013; 65: 129–135.
Oliveira JC, Murphy CF, Schochat E: Auditory processing in children with dyslexia: electrophysiological and behavior evaluation. CODAS 2013; 25: 39–44.
Gaab N, Gabrieli JD, Deutsch GK, Tallal P, Temple E: Neural correlates of rapid auditory processing are disrupted in children with developmental dyslexia and ameliorated with training: an fMRI study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 295–310.
Tallal P, Gaab N: Dynamic auditory processing, musical experience and language development. Trends Neurosci 2006; 29: 382–390.
Temple E, Poldrack RA, Protopapas A, Nagarajan S, Salz T, Tallal P, et al: Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 13907–13912.
Moojen S, Lamprecht R, Santos R, Freitas G, Brodacz R, Siqueira M, et al: Confias – consciência fonológica: instrumento de avaliação seqüencial. São Paulo, Casa do Psicólogo, 2003.
Denckla MB, Rudel RG: Rapid automatized naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex 1974; 10: 186–202.
Ferreira TL, Capellini SA, Ciasca SM, Tonelotto JMF: Desempenho de escolares leitores proficientes no teste de nomeação automatizada rápida – RAN. Temas Desenvolvimento 2003; 12: 26–32.
Kessler TM: Estudo da Memória Operacional em Pré-escolares; master tesis. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 1997. http://jararaca.ufsm.br/websites/ppgdch/download/dis.1997/themis.pdf.
Pinheiro L, Correa J, Mousinho R: eficácia de estratégias de remediação fonoaudiológica na avaliação das dificuldades de aprendizagem. Rev Psicopedagog 2012; 29: 215–225.
Alvarenga KF, Duarte JL, Silva DPC, Agostinho-Pesse RS, Negrato CA, Costa OA: Cognitive P300 potential in subjects with diabetes mellitus. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2005; 71: 202–207.
González ROM, Espinel AI, Rosquete RG: Remedial interventions for children with reading disabilities: speech perception – an effective component in phonological training? J Learn Disabil 2002; 35: 334–342.
Salgado CA, Capellini SA: Phonological remediation program in students with developmental dyslexia. Pro Fono 2008; 20: 31–36.
Cherry R, Rubinstein A: Comparing monotic and diotic selective auditory attention abilities in children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006; 37: 137–142.
Idiazábal-Aletxa MA, Saperas-Rodríguez M: Auditory processing in specific language disorder. Rev Neurol 2008; 46: 91–95.
Bicalho LGR, Alves LM: A nomeação seriada rápida em escolares com e sem queixas de problemas de aprendizagem em escola pública e particular. CEFAC 2010; 12: 608–616.
Ehri LC: Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English; in Metsala JL, Ehri LC: Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp 3–40.
Morgado I: The psychobiology of learning and memory: fundamentals and recent advances (in Spanish). Rev Neurol 2005; 40: 289–297.
Santos MR, Siqueira M: Consciência fonológica e memória. Rev Fono Atul 2002; 5: 48–53.
Fletcher JM, Lyons GR, Fuchs LS, Barnes MA: Transtornos de aprendizagem: da identificação à intervenção. Porto Alegre, Artmed, 2009.
Queiroga BA, Borba DM, Vogeley AC: Habilidades metalinguísticas e a apropriação do sistema ortográfico. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2004; 9: 73–80.
Tenório S, Ávila C: Processamento fonológico e desempenho escolar nas séries iniciais do ensino fundamental. CEFAC 2012; 14: 30–38.
Capovilla FC, Capovilla AGS: Compreendendo a natureza dos problemas de aquisição de leitura e escrita: mapeando o envolvimento de distúrbios cognitivos de discriminação fonológica, velocidade de processamento e memória fonológica. Cadern Psicopedagog 2001; 1: 14–37.
Stanovich KE: Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden variety poor reader: the phonological-core variable-difference model. J Lear Disabil 1988; 21: 590–604.
Capellini AS: Eficácia do programa de remediação fonológica em escolares com distúrbio específico de leitura e distúrbio de aprendizagem; doctoral dissertation. Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2001. http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=vtls000222879.
Navas ALGP, Santos MTM: Aquisição e desenvolvimento da linguagem escrita; in Santos MTM, Navas ALGP (eds): Distúrbios de Leitura e Escrita: teoria e prática. São Paulo, Manole, 2004, vol 1, pp 1–26.
Guarinello AC, Berberian AP, Massi GA, Santana AP, Rivabem K, Jacob LCB, et al: Dificuldades de aprendizagem da escrita: uma análise de acompanhamentos clínicos dessa modalidade de linguagem. Rev Let 2006; 70: 247–266.
Baker S, Gersten R, Graham S: Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: research-based applications and examples. J Learn Disabil 2003; 36: 109–123.
Singer BD, Bashir AS: Developmental variations in writing composition skills; in Stone ER, Silliman BJ, Ehren BJ, Apel K (eds): Handbook of Language and Literacy: Development and Disorders. New York, The Guilford Press, 2006, pp 559–582.
Leite RA, Wertzner HF, Matas CG: Long latency auditory evoked potentials in children with phonological disorder. Pro Fono 2010; 22:561–566.
Jucla M, Nenert R, Chaix Y, Demonet JF: Remediation effects on N170 and P300 in children with developmental dyslexia. Behav Neurol 2010; 22: 121–129.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.