Purpose: Speech-language pathologists routinely assess physical tension during evaluation of those who stutter. If speakers experience tension that is not visible to clinicians, then judgments of severity may be inaccurate. This study addressed this potential discrepancy by comparing judgments of tension by people who stutter and expert clinicians to determine if clinicians could accurately identify the speakers’ experience of physical tension. Method: Ten adults who stutter were audio-video recorded in two speaking samples. Two board-certified specialists in fluency evaluated the samples using the Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 and a checklist adapted for this study. Speakers rated their tension using the same forms, and then discussed their experiences in a qualitative interview so that themes related to physical tension could be identified. Results: The degree of tension reported by speakers was higher than that observed by specialists. Tension in parts of the body that were less visible to the observer (chest, abdomen, throat) was reported more by speakers than by specialists. The thematic analysis revealed that speakers’ experience of tension changes over time and that these changes may be related to speakers’ acceptance of stuttering. Conclusion: The lack of agreement between speaker and specialist perceptions of tension suggests that using self-reports is a necessary component for supporting the accurate diagnosis of tension in stuttering.

1.
Bloodstein O, Bernstein Ratner N: A Handbook on Stuttering, ed 6. New York, Thomson-Delmar, 2008.
2.
Yaruss JS, Quesal R: Stuttering and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): an update. J Commun Disord 2004; 37: 35–52.
3.
Brutten EJ, Shoemaker DJ: The Modification of Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, 1967.
4.
Snidecor J: Tension and facial appearance in stuttering; in Johnson W (ed): Stuttering in Children and Adults. Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press, 1955.
5.
Wingate ME: A standard definition of stuttering. J Speech Hear Disord 1964; 29: 484–489.
6.
Starkweather CW: Fluency and Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1987.
7.
Bloodstein O: A rating scale study of conditions under which stuttering is reduced or absent. J Speech Hear Disord 1950; 15: 29–36.
8.
Johnson W: Stuttering and What You Can Do about It. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1961.
9.
Starkweather CW, Givens-Ackerman J: Stuttering. Austin, Pro-Ed, 1997.
10.
Johnson W: Stuttering; in: Speech Handicapped School Children. New York, Harper & Row, 1967, pp 229–329.
11.
Sheehan JG: Tension patterns during stuttering in relation to conflict, anxiety-binding, and reinforcement. Speech Monogr 1954; 21: 272–279.
12.
Martin R, Haroldson SK: Stuttering and speech naturalness: audio and audiovisual judgments. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 521–528.
13.
Riley GD: A stuttering severity instrument for children and adults. J Speech Hear Disord 1972; 37: 314–322.
14.
Riley GD: Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI-4), ed 3. Austin, Pro-Ed, 2009.
15.
Lewis K: Do SSI-3 scores adequately reflect observations of stuttering behaviors? J Speech Lang Pathol 1995; 4: 46–59.
16.
Shapiro A: An electromyographic analysis of the fluent and dysfluent utterances of several types of stutterers. J Fluency Disord 1980; 5: 203–231.
17.
Smith A, Denny M, Shaffer L, Kelly E, Hirano M: Activity of intrinsic laryngeal muscles in fluent and disfluent speech. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 329–348.
18.
De Felicio CM, Rodrigues RL, Freitas G, Vitti M, Regalo SCH: Comparison of upper and lower lip muscle activity between stutterers and fluent speakers. Int J Pediatr Otorhino-laryngol 2007; 71: 1187–1192.
19.
Denny M, Smith A: Gradations in a pattern of neuromuscular activity associated with stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1216–1229.
20.
Smith A, Luschei E, Denny M, Wood J, Hirano M, Badylak M: Spectral analyses of activity of laryngeal and orofacial muscles in stutterers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56: 1303–1311.
21.
Yaruss JS, Quesal R: Overall assessment of the speaker’s experience of stuttering (OASES): documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. J Fluency Disord 2006; 31: 90–115.
22.
Yaruss JS, Quesal R: Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering (OASES). Bloomington, Pearson Assessments, 2010.
23.
Guntupalli VK, Kalinowski J, Saltuklaroglu T: The need for self-report data in the assessment of stuttering therapy efficacy: repetitions and prolongations of speech. The stuttering syndrome. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2006; 41: 1–18.
24.
Ingham RJ, Warner A, Byrd A, Cotton J: Speech effort measurement and stuttering: investigating the chorus reading effect. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49: 660–670.
25.
Ingham RJ, Bothe A, Jang E, Yates L, Cotton J, Seybold I: Measurement of speech effort during fluency-inducing conditions in adults who do and do not stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52: 1286–1301.
26.
Yaruss JS, Quesal R, Reeves L, Molt L, Kluetz B, Caruso A, McClure J, Lewis F: Speech treatment and support group experiences of people who participate in the National Stuttering Association. J Fluency Disord 2002; 27: 115–134.
27.
Cordes AK, Ingham RJ: Time-interval measurement of stuttering: establishing and modifying judgment accuracy. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 298–310.
28.
Kully D, Boberg E: An investigation of the inter-clinic agreement in the identification of fluent and stuttered syllables. J Fluency Disord 1988; 13: 309–318.
29.
Bricker-Katz G, Lincoln M, McCabe P: Older people who stutter: barriers to communication and perceptions of treatment needs. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2010; 45: 15–30.
30.
Plexico LW, Manning WH, Levitt H: Coping responses by adults who stutter. Part I. Protecting self and others. J Fluency Disord 2009; 34: 87–107.
31.
Martin R, Haroldson SK: Stuttering as involuntary loss of speech control: barking up a new tree. J Speech Hear Disord 1986; 51: 187–191.
32.
Moore SE, Perkins WH: Validity and reliability of judgments of authentic and simulated stuttering. J Speech Hear Disord 1990; 55: 383–391.
33.
Boyatzis RE: Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1998.
34.
Bainbridge LA, Stavros C, Ebrahimian M, Wang Y, Ingham RJ: The efficacy of stuttering measurement training: evaluating two training programs. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58: 278–286.
35.
Cordes AK, Ingham RJ: Effects of time-interval judgment training on real-time measurement of stuttering. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 862–879.
36.
Constantino CD, Leslie P, Quesal R, Yaruss JS: A preliminary investigation of daily variability of stuttering in adults. J Commun Disord 2016; 60: 39–50.
37.
Van Riper C: The Treatment of Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1973.
38.
Sheehan JG: The modification of stuttering through non-reinforcement. J Abnorm Psychol 1951; 46: 51–63.
39.
Williams DE: A point of view about stuttering. J Speech Hear Disord 1957; 22: 390–397.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.