Objective: Antibullying initiatives indicate that all school-based personnel should accept responsibility for changing the school climate and eliminating bullying. This study examined if victims seeking assistance for bullying contacted speech-language pathologists (SLPs), SLPs' preparation to address bullying and their current perceptions of responsibilities and interventions. Methods: A mailed survey consisting of a questionnaire and scale on bullying intervention strategies was completed by 418 school-based SLPs. Results: Sixty-one (14.6%) SLPs reported that victims on their caseloads told them directly about being bullied during the last month. The majority of SLPs (84.9%) reported that bullying was a problem in schools, and 65.1% reported that they had observed students being bullied in the past month. Less than half of the SLPs (46.7%) reported feeling prepared to deal with bullying episodes. Thirty-six SLPs (7.9%) reported that they did not address bullying issues because it was outside the scope of practice or job responsibilities. Conclusions: This is the first large study to report that victims seek help from SLPs directly for assistance with bullying incidents. SLPs stated that they received some training in addressing bullying issues but did not feel prepared. SLPs thought bullying was a problem but were undecided about the best strategies for assisting the students.

Keywords:
Victimization, Students, Quality of life, Speech-language pathology, Bullying, Education, Perceptual rating
1.
Hong JS, Espelage DL: A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: an ecological system analysis. Aggress Violent Behavior 2012;17:311-322.
2.
Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton B, et al: Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA 2001;285:2094-2100.
3.
Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR: School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health 2009;45:368-375.
4.
Olweus D: Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Malden, Blackwell Publishing, 1993.
5.
Olweus D: Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994;35:1171-1190.
6.
Barhight LR, Hubbard JA, Hyde CT: Children's physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Dev 2013;84:375-390.
7.
Espelage DL, De La Rue L: School bullying: its nature and ecology. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2012;24:3-10.
8.
Kowalski RM, Limber, SP: Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health 2012;53:S13-S20.
9.
Özdemir M, Håkan S: Bullies, victims, and bully-victims: a longitudinal examination of the effects of bullying-victimization experiences on youth well-being. J Aggress Confl Peace Res 2011;3:97-102.
10.
Penning SL, Bhagwanjee A, Kaymarlin G: Bullying boys: the traumatic effects of bullying in male adolescent learners. J Child Adolesc Ment Health 2010;22:131-143.
11.
Slonje R, Smith PK: Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol 2008;49:147-154.
12.
Turner MG, Exum ML, Brame, R, Holt, TJ: Bullying victimization and adolescent mental health: general and typological effects across sex. J Crim Justice 2013;41:53-59.
13.
Vanderbilt D, Augustyn M: The effects of bullying. Paediatr Child Health 2010;20:315-320.
14.
Juvonen J, Graham S: Bullying in schools: the power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annu Rev Psychol 2014;65:159-185.
15.
Limber SP, Olweus D, Luxenberg H: Bullying in US Schools, 2012 Status Report. Center City, MN, Hazelden Foundation, 2013.
16.
Smith P: Understanding School Bullying: Its Nature and Prevention Strategies. London, Sage Publishing, 2014.
17.
Stassen Berger K: Update on bullying at school: science forgotten? Dev Rev 2007;27:90-126.
18.
Ttofi MM, Farrington DP: Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. J Exp Criminol 2011;7:27-56.
19.
Bauman S, Del Rio A: Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. J Educ Psychol 2006;98:219-239.
20.
Boulton MJ, Hardcastle K, Down J, Fowles J, Simmonds JA: A comparison of preservice teachers' responses to cyber versus traditional bullying scenarios: similarities and differences and implications for practice. J Teach Educ 2014;65:145-155.
21.
Bradshaw CP, Waasdorp TE, O'Brennan LM, Gulemetova M: Teachers' and education support professionals' perspectives on bullying and prevention: findings from a national education association study. School Psych Rev 2013;42:280-301.
22.
James DJ, Lawlor M, Courtney P, Flynn A, Henry B, Murphy L: Bullying behaviour in secondary schools: what roles do teachers play? Child Abuse Rev 2008;17:160-173.
23.
Veenstra R, Siegwart L, Huitsing G, Sainio M, Salmivalli C: The role of teachers in bullying: the relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. J Educ Psychol 2014;106:1135-1143.
24.
Wang C, Swearer SM, Lembeck AC, Berry B: Teachers matter: an examination of student-teacher relationships, attitudes toward bullying, and bullying behavior. J Appl School Psychol 2015;31:219-238.
25.
Boulton MJ, Murphy D, Lloyd J, Besling S, Coote J, Lewis J, Perrin R, Walsh L: Helping counts: predicting children's intentions to disclose being bullied to teachers from prior social support experiences. Brit Educ Res J 2013;39:209-221.
26.
Espelage DL, Polanin JR, Low SK: Teacher and staff perceptions of school environment as predictors of student aggression, victimization, and willingness to intervene in bullying situations. School Psychol Quart 2014;29:287-298.
27.
Hymel S, McClure R, Miller M, Shumka E, Trach J: Addressing school bullying: insights from theories of group processes. J Appl Dev Psychol 2015;37:16-24.
28.
Rigby K: Bullying in schools: addressing desires, not only behaviours. Educ Psychol Rev 2012;24:339-348.
29.
Richard JF, Schneider BH, Pascal M: Revisiting the whole-school approach to bullying: really looking at the whole school. School Psychol Int 2012;33:263-284.
30.
Troop-Gordon W: The role of the classroom teacher in the lives of children victimized by peers. Child Dev Perspect 2015;9:55-60.
31.
Copeland WE, Wolke D, Angold A, Costello EJ: Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry 2013;70:419-426.
32.
Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ: Bullying in childhood, externalizing behaviors, and adult offending: evidence from a 30-year study. J School Violence 2014;13:146-164.
33.
Klomek AB, Sourander A, Kumpulainen K, Piha J, Tamminen T, Moilanen I, et al: Childhood bullying as a risk for later depression and suicidal ideation among Finnish males. J Affect Disord 2008;109:47-55.
34.
Sourander A: The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. Can J Psychiatry 2010;55:282-287.
35.
Vaillancourt T, Hymel S, McDougall P: The biological underpinnings of peer victimization: understanding why and how the effects of bullying can last a lifetime. Theory Pract 2013;52:241-248.
36.
Wolke D, Sapouna M: Big men feeling small: childhood bullying experience, muscle dysmorphia and other mental health problems in bodybuilders. Psychol Sport Exerc 2008;9:595-604.
37.
Takizawa R, Maughan B, Arseneault A: Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying victimization: evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. Am J Psychiatry 2014;171:777-784.
38.
Blake JJ, Lund EM, Zhou Q, Kwok O, Benz MR: National prevalence rates of bully victimization among students with disabilities in the United States. School Psychol Quart 2012;27:210-222.
39.
Christensen LL, Fraynt RJ, Neece CL, Baker BL: Bullying adolescents with intellectual disability. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil 2012;5:49-65.
40.
Estell DB, Farmer TW, Irvin MJ, Crowther A, Akos P, Boudah DJ: Students with exceptionalities and the peer group context of bullying and victimization in late elementary school. J Child Fam Stud 2009;18:136-150.
41.
Farmer TW, Petrin R, Sprott Brooks D, Hamm JV, Lambert K, Gravelle M: Bullying involvement and the school adjustment of rural students with and without disabilities. J Emot Behav Disord 2012;20:19-37.
42.
Farmer TW, Wike TL, Alexander QR, Rodkin PC, Mehtaji M: Students with disabilities and involvement in peer victimization: theory, research, and considerations for the future. Rem Spec Educ 2015;36:263-274.
43.
Flynt SW, Morton RC: Bullying and children with disabilities. J Instr Psychol 2004;31:330-334.
44.
Hartley MT, Bauman S, Nixon CL, Davis S: Comparative study of bullying victimization among students in general and special education. Except Children 2015;81:176-193.
45.
Mishna F: Learning disabilities and bullying double jeopardy. J Learn Disabil 2003;36:336-347.
46.
Maag JW, Katsiyannis A: Bullying and students with disabilities: legal and practice considerations. Behav Disorders 2012;15:78-86.
47.
Redmond SM: Peer victimization among students with specific language impairment, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and typical development. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2011;42:520-535.
48.
Rose CA, Espelage DL, Monda-Amaya LE: Bullying and victimization rates among students in general and special education: a comparative analysis. Educ Psychol 2009;29:761-776.
49.
Rose CA, Forber-Pratt AJ, Espelage DL, Aragon SR: The influence of psychosocial factors on bullying involvement of students with disabilities. Theory Pract 2013;52:272-279.
50.
Son E, Parish SL, Peterson NA: National prevalence of peer victimization among young children with disabilities in the United States. Child Youth Serv Rev 2012;34:1540-1545.
51.
Rose CA, Monda-Amaya L, Espelage DL: Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: a review of the literature. Rem Spec Educ 2011;32:114-129.
52.
Rose CA, Simpson CG, Moss A: The bullying dynamic: prevalence of involvement among a large-scale sample of middle and high school youth with and without disabilities. Psychol Schools 2015;52:515-531.
53.
Espelage DL, Rose CA, Polanin JR: Social-emotional learning program to reduce bullying, fighting, and victimization among middle school students with disabilities. Rem Spec Educ 2015;36:299-311.
54.
Faith MA, Reed G, Heppner CE, Hamill LC, Tarkenton TR, Donewar CW: Bullying in medically fragile youth: a review of risks, protective factors, and recommendations for medical providers. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2015;36:285-301.
55.
Hong ER, Neely L, Lund EM: Addressing bullying of students with autism suggestions for families and educators. Interv Sch Clin 2015;50:157-162.
56.
Raskauskas J, Modell S: Modifying anti-bullying programs to include students with disabilities. Teach Except Child 2011;44:60-68.
57.
Studer JR, Mynatt BS: Bullying prevention in middle schools: a collaborative approach: collaborative, proactive anti-bullying interventions and policies that strive to create and sustain a safe environment for all adolescents. Middle School J 2015;46:25-32.
58.
Blood GW: Bullying be gone. ASHA Lead 2014;19:36-42.
59.
Blood GW, Blood IM: Cyberbullying in students with communication and social disabilities: speech-language pathologists' perceptions. Proceedings from the Ireland International Conference on Education (IICE-2015). Dublin, 2015, pp 78-85.
60.
Blood GW, Boyle MP, Blood IM, Nalesnik GR: Bullying in children who stutter: speech-language pathologists' perceptions and intervention strategies. J Fluency Disord 2010;35:92-109.
61.
Blood GW, Blood IM, Coniglio AD, Finke EH, Boyle MP: Familiarity breeds support: speech-language pathologists' perceptions of bullying of students with autism spectrum disorders. J Commun Disord 2013;46:169-180.
62.
Blood GW, Decker KL, Raviotti KA, Leibig AM, Blood IM: Bullying in schools: speech language pathologists' responses to specific bullying incidents. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids 2014;2:121-129.
63.
Blood GW, Robins LA, Blood IM, Boyle MP, Finke EH: Bullying, school-based speech-language pathologists, and English language learners: seriousness, intervention, and strategy selection. Perspect School Based Issues 2011;12:128-138.
64.
Bauman S, Rigby K, Hoppa K: US teachers' and school counsellors' strategies for handling school bullying incidents. Educ Psychol 2008;28:837-856.
65.
Kochenderfer-Ladd B, Pelletier ME: Teachers' views and beliefs about bullying: influences on classroom management strategies and students' coping with peer victimization. J School Psychol 2008;46:431-453.
66.
Nicolaides S, Toda Y, Smith PK: Knowledge and attitudes about school bullying in trainee teachers. Br J Educ Psychol 2002;72:105-118.
67.
Pernice-Duca F, Taiariol J, Yoon J: Perceptions of school and family climates and experiences of relational aggression. J School Violence 2010;9:303-319.
68.
Yoon JS, Kerber K: Bullying: Elementary teachers' attitudes and intervention strategies. Res Educ 2003;69:27-35.
69.
Vagias WM: Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism and Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University, 2006. https://www.clemson.edu/centers-institutes/tourism/documents/sample-scales.pdf.
70.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics, ed 6. Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 2012.
71.
Dowling MJ, Carey TA: Victims of bullying: whom they seek help from and why: an Australian sample. Psychol Schools 2013;50:798-809.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.