Overview: Working music theater singers (MTS) typically have a heavy vocal load and little is known about their perception of vocal function. The Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) was used to assess professional MTS' perceptions of current singing voice status and to compare scores across demographic and performance characteristics and to evaluate the construct validity of the EASE and its subscales (VF = Vocal Fatigue, PRI = Pathologic-Risk Indicators). Methods: Professional MTS (n = 284) completed an online survey including the EASE and two additional Vocal Concern (VC) items. Scores were compared across age, gender, whether currently working, role, perceived vocal load over the past 24 h and self-reported voice problem. Results: For the whole cohort, statistically significant differences were found on all subscales according to whether or not singers perceived themselves to have a voice problem (p < 0.001). Currently performing singers were significantly different from those not performing in a show on the EASE Total (p = 0.014) and VF (p = 0.002), but not for PRI and VC. In the currently performing singer group, significant differences were found for gender, role and perceived voice problem on the EASE Total and all subscales (p < 0.01). Significantly higher VF scores were recorded for singers with heavy vocal load (p = 0.01), but there were no differences on the EASE Total (p = 0.57), PRI (p = 0.19) or VC subscales (p = 0.53). Among these performing singers, no significant age differences were found for any EASE subscales. Conclusions: These findings provide further validation of the EASE as a useful tool for measuring singers' perceptions of vocal function and suggest that the subscales should be scored separately. Future evaluation of the EASE against objective clinical assessments (e.g., videostroboscopy) is recommended. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

1.
Richter B, Löhle E, Maier W, Kliemann B, Verdolini K: Working conditions on stage: climatic considerations. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2000;25:80.
2.
Wanke E: Survey of health problems in musical theater students: a pilot study. Med Problems Perform Artists 2012;27:205-211.
3.
Phyland DJ, Greenwood K, Oates JM: Self-reported voice problems among three groups of professional singers. J Voice 1999;13:602.
4.
Richter B, Löhle E, Maier W, Kliemann B, Verdolini K: Harmful substances on the opera stage: possible negative effects on singers' respiratory tracts. J Voice 2002;16:72.
5.
Spivey N: Music theater singing…let's talk. Part 2: Examining the debate on belting. J Sing 2008;64:607.
6.
LeBorgne W, Lee L, Stemple J, Bush H: Perceptual findings on the Broadway belt voice. J Voice 2010;24:678-689.
7.
Björkner E: Musical theater and opera singing - why so different? A study of subglottal pressure, voice source, and formant frequency characteristics. J Voice 2008;22:533-540.
8.
Eller N, Skylv G, Dahlin E, Suadicini P, Gyntelberg F: Health and lifestyle characteristics of professional singers and instrumentalists. Occup Med (Lond) 1992;42:89-92.
9.
Vintturi J, Alku P, Lauri ER, Sala E, Sihvo M, Vilkman E: Objective analysis of vocal warm-up with special reference to ergonomic factors. J Voice 2001;15:36-53.
10.
Titze I: Toward occupational safety criteria for vocalization. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 1999;24:49-54.
11.
Laukkanen AM, Kankare E: Vocal loading-related changes in male teachers' voices investigated before and after a working day. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2006;58:229-239.
12.
McCabe DJ, Titze IR: Chant therapy for treating vocal fatigue among public school teachers: a preliminary study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002;11:356-369.
13.
Titze IR: Mechanical stress in phonation. J Voice 1994;8:99.
14.
Solomon NP: Vocal fatigue and its relation to vocal hyperfunction. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2008;10:254.
15.
Titze IR, Svec JG, Popolo PS: Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003;46:919-932.
16.
Schweinfurth J, Thibeault SL: Does hyaluronic acid distribution in the larynx relate to the newborn's capacity for crying? Laryngoscope 2008;118:1692-1699.
17.
Hunter E, Titze I: Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009;118:449-460.
18.
Branski RC, Verdolini K, Sandulache V, Rosen CA, Hebda PA: Vocal fold wound healing: a review for clinicians. J Voice 2006;20:432-442.
19.
Verdolini K, Ramig LO: Review: occupational risks for voice problems. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2001;26:37.
20.
Maclagan MA, Welham NV: Vocal fatigue: current knowledge and future directions. J Voice 2003;17:21-30.
21.
Verdolini K, Rosen CA, Branski RC, Hebda PA: Shifts in biochemical markers associated with wound healing in laryngeal secretions following phonotrauma: a preliminary study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003;112:1021-1025.
22.
Schloneger MJ: Graduate student voice use and vocal efficiency in an opera rehearsal week: a case study. J Voice 2010;25:265-273.
23.
Li NYK, Verdolini K, Clermont G, Mi Q, Rubinstein EN, Hebda PA, Vodovotz Y: A patient-specific in silico model of inflammation and healing tested in acute vocal fold injury. PloS One 2008;3:e2789.
24.
Behrman A, Rutledge J, Hembree A, Sheridan S: Vocal hygiene education, voice production therapy, and the role of patient adherence: a treatment effectiveness study in women with phonotrauma. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008;51:350-366.
25.
Phyland DJ, Thibeault SL, Benninger MS, Vallance N, Greenwood KM, Smith JA: Perspectives on the impact of vocal function of heavy vocal load among working professional music theater performers. J Voice 2013;27:390-399.
26.
Sabol JW, Lee L, Stemple JC: The value of vocal function exercises in the practice regimen of singers. J Voice 1995;9:27-36.
27.
Gehling D, Sridharan S, Fritz M, Friedmann DR, Fang Y, Amin MR, Branski RC: Backstage at Broadway: a demographic study. J Voice 2014;28:311-315.
28.
Miller MK, Verdolini K: Frequency and risk factors for voice problems in teachers of singing and control subjects. J Voice 1995;9:348-362.
29.
Cohen SM, Jacobsen BH, Garrett GC, Noordzij PJ, Stewart MG, Attia A, Ossoff RH, Cleveland TF: Creation and validation of the singing voice handicap index. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;116:402-406.
30.
Morsomme D, Simon C, Jamart J, Remacle M, Verduyckt I: A proposal to adapt the voice handicap index to the singing voice. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 2005;126:305-313.
31.
Benninger MS: Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients. J Voice 1998;12:540.
32.
Murry T, Zschommler A, Prokop J: Voice handicap in singers. J Voice 2009;23:376.
33.
Moreti F, Ávila MEB, Rocha C, Borrego MCM, Oliveira G, Behlau M: Influence of complaints and singing style in singers voice handicap. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2012;24:296-300.
34.
Phyland DJ, Pallant J, Benninger MS, Thibeault SL, Greenwood KM, Smith JA, Vallance N: Development and preliminary validation of the EASE: a tool to measure perceived singing voice function. J Voice 2013;27:454-462.
35.
Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, ed 4. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.
36.
Roach KE: Measurement of health outcomes: reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:8-12.
37.
Nunnally J: Psychometric Theory. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1978.
38.
Lauri ER, Alku P, Vilkman E, Sala E, Sihvo S: Effects of prolonged oral reading on time-based glottal flow waveform parameters with special reference to gender differences. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1997;49:234-246.
39.
Herrington-Hall BL, Lee L, Stemple JC, Niemi K: Description of laryngeal pathologies by age, sex, occupation in a treatment-seeking sample. J Speech Hear Disord 1988;53:57-64.
40.
Carding PN, Wilson JA, Mackenzie K, Deary IJ: Measuring voice outcomes: state of the science review. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:823-829.
41.
Branski RC, Cukier-Blaj S, Pusic A, et al: Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: a systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures. J Voice 2010;24:193-198.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.