Background and Objectives: There is a lack of consensus regarding the clinical presentation and diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to explore voice-related abnormalities in a group of LPR patients, diagnosed with a 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring. Patients and Methods: Eighty-two patients with voice-related problems participated in the study. Diagnosis of LPR was made using a 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring. Patients were divided accordingly into positive and negative pH groups. Comparisons between the two groups were done, including results of clinical presentation, Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), reflux symptom index (RSI), reflux finding score (RFS), and acoustic measurements. The correlation was conducted between Ryan scores and other variables including VHI-10, RSI, and RFS. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for RSI and VHI-10. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical presentation, RFS or acoustic measures. Significant positive correlations were found between the Ryan composite measurements and both severity ratings (VHI-10, RSI). Conclusion: LPR clinical presentation appears to be non-specific in terms of symptoms and laryngeal findings. LPR appears to have an effect on the patients' self-perception of voice problems. Further studies are needed to clarify the effect of LPR on acoustic measurements.

1.
Oelschlager BK, Chang L, Pope CE 2nd, Pellegrini CA: Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux. J Surg Res 2005;128:55-60.
2.
Vailati C, Mazzoleni G, Bondi S, Bussi M, Testoni PA, Passaretti S: Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for laryngopharyngeal reflux: is it a reliable test before therapy? J Voice 2013;27:84-89.
3.
Qadeer MA, Swoger J, Milstein C, Hicks DM, Ponsky J, Richter JE, Abelson TI, Vaezi MF: Correlation between symptoms and laryngeal signs in laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1947-1952.
4.
Friedman M, Hamilton C, Samuelson CG, Kelley K, Taylor R, Darling R, Taylor D, Fisher M, Maley A: The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:952-958.
5.
Merati AL, Lim HJ, Ulualp SO, Toohill RJ: Meta-analysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114:177-182.
6.
Vaezi MF, Schroeder PL, Richter JE: Reproducibility of proximal probe pH parameters in 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:825-829.
7.
Beaver ME, Stasney CR, Weitzel E, Stewart MG, Donovan DT, Parke RB Jr, Rodriguez M: Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease with digital imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:103-108.
8.
Wiener GJ, Koufman JA, Wu WC, Cooper JB, Richter JE, Castell DO: Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84:1503-1508.
9.
Shaw GY, Searl JP, Young JL, Miner PB: Subjective, laryngoscopic, and acoustic measurements of laryngeal reflux before and after treatment with omeprazole. J Voice 1996;10:410-418.
10.
Wolf E: Self-condensing pH sensor. US patent No 7,166,201. San Diego, Sierra Medical Technology Inc, 2007.
11.
Wiener GJ, Kelly C, Wolf EH, Schmeltzer ME, Bankert CS: Dx-pH measurement system: a sensitive device for detecting liquid and aerosolized supraesophageal gastric reflux (SEGR). Gastroenterology 2006;130(suppl S2):A-115.
12.
Wiener GJ, Tsukashima R, Kelly C, Wolf E, Schmeltzer M, Bankert C, Fisk L, Vaezi M: Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for the detection of liquid and aerosolized supraesophageal gastric reflux. J Voice 2009;23:498-504.
13.
Golub JS, Johns MM 3rd, Lim JH, DelGaudio JM, Klein AM: Comparison of an oropharyngeal pH probe and a standard dual pH probe for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009;118:1-5.
14.
Pribuisiene R, Uloza V, Kupcinskas L, Jonaitis L: Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients. J Voice 2006;20:128-136.
15.
Oguz H, Tarhan E, Korkmaz M, Yilmaz U, Safak MA, Demirci M, Ozluoglu LN: Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. J Voice 2007;21:203-210.
16.
Pribuisiene R, Uloza V, Saferis V: Multidimensional voice analysis of reflux laryngitis patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:35-40.
17.
Farahat M: Validation and reliability of Arabic Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Saudi J Otorhinol Head Neck Surg 2012;14:11-17.
18.
Farahat M, Malki KH, Mesallam TA: Development of the Arabic version of Reflux Symptom Index. J Voice 2012;26:814.e15-9.
19.
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA: The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 2001;111:1313-1317.
20.
Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, Tang AL, Zehetner J, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, Abate E, Banki F, DeMeester SR, DeMeester TR: A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1422-1429.
21.
Barry DW, Vaezi MF: Laryngopharyngeal reflux: more questions than answers. Cleve Clin J Med 2010;77:327-334.
22.
Hoppo T, Komatsu Y, Nieponice A, Schrenker J, Jobe BA: Toward an improved understanding of isolated upright reflux: positional effects on the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. World J Surg 2012;36:1623-1631.
23.
Cesari U, Galli J, Ricciardiello F, Cavaliere M, Galli V: Dysphonia and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2004;24:13-19.
24.
Ozturk O, Oz F, Karakullukcu B, Oghan F, Guclu E, Ada M: Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a cause and effect relationship or coincidence? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:935-939.
25.
Lewin JS, Gillenwater AM, Garrett JD, Bishop-Leone JK, Nguyen DD, Callender DL, Ayers GD, Myers JN: Characterization of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with premalignant or early carcinomas of the larynx. Cancer 2003;97:1010-1014.
26.
Vaezi MF: Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Cornerstone 2003;5:32-38; discussion 39-40.
27.
Diamond L: Laryngopharyngeal reflux - it's not GERD. JAAPA 2005;18:50-53.
28.
Khan AM, Hashmi SR, Elahi F, Tariq M, Ingrams DR: Laryngopharyngeal reflux: a literature review. Surgeon 2006;4:221-225.
29.
Lundy DS, Casiano RR, Sullivan PA, Roy S, Xue JW, Evans J: Incidence of abnormal laryngeal findings in asymptomatic singing students. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:69-77.
30.
Elias ME, Sataloff RT, Rosen DC, Heuer RJ, Spiegel JR: Normal strobovideolaryngoscopy: variability in healthy singers. J Voice 1997;11:104-107.
31.
Heman-Ackah YD, Dean CM, Sataloff RT: Strobovideolaryngoscopic findings in singing teachers. J Voice 2002;16:81-86.
32.
Reulbach TR, Belafsky PC, Blalock PD, Koufman JA, Postma GN: Occult laryngeal pathology in a community-based cohort. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:448-450.
33.
Hicks DM, Ours TM, Abelson TI, Vaezi MF, Richter JE: The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers. J Voice 2002;16:564-579.
34.
Milstein CF, Charbel S, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, Richter JE, Vaezi MF: Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs. flexible laryngoscope). Laryngoscope 2005;115:2256-2261.
35.
Branski RC, Bhattacharyya N, Shapiro J: The reliability of the assessment of endoscopic laryngeal findings associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1019-1024.
36.
Jaspersen D, Kulig M, Labenz J, Leodolter A, Lind T, Meyer-Sabellek W, Vieth M, Willich SN, Lindner D, Stolte M, Malfertheiner P: Prevalence of extra-oesophageal manifestations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an analysis based on the progerd study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:1515-1520.
37.
Musser J, Kelchner L, Neils-Strunjas J, Montrose M: A comparison of rating scales used in the diagnosis of extraesophageal reflux. J Voice 2011;25:293-300.
38.
Vaezi MF, Richter JE, Stasney CR, Spiegel JR, Iannuzzi RA, Crawley JA, Hwang C, Sostek MB, Shaker R: Treatment of chronic posterior laryngitis with esomeprazole. Laryngoscope 2006;116:254-260.
39.
Selby JC, Gilbert HR, Lerman JW: Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux pre- and post-treatment. J Voice 2003;17:557-570.
40.
Ross JA, Noordzji JP, Woo P: Voice disorders in patients with suspected laryngo-pharyngeal reflux disease. J Voice 1998;12:84-88.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.