Objectives: It has been suggested that dyslexia is linked to a core cognitive deficit in phonological awareness tasks and/or in the processing of auditory stimuli. Auditory evoked potentials are a valid, objective measure of the accuracy of central auditory processing in humans. The aim of this study was to assess auditory evoked potentials in children with dyslexia. Patients and Methods: Sixty-six children participated in the study. A set of hearing tests and the recording of complex event-related potentials (ERPs) were performed. Results: Mixmatch negativity (MMN) and P300 waves were significantly more frequent in the healthy children (control group) than in children with dyslexia. The P300 wave was present in all subjects from the control group, the MMN wave in 92% of them. In the dyslexic group, complex ERPs were recorded roughly 33% of the time. Latencies of complex ERPs in children with dyslexia were greater than latencies in children in the control group. MMN and P300 maturation (change with age) was observed only for the control group. A wide range of MMN and P300 responses was observed across children with dyslexia. Conclusion: Complex ERPs may be useful in determining the condition of audiologic functions; however, on their own they are not sufficient to recognize dyslexia because of the heterogeneity of nonspecific changes.

Keywords:
Audiology, Child language, Dyslexia, Speech and language therapy
1.
Kujala T, Myllyviita K, Tervaniemi M, Ahlo K, Kallio JN, Näätänen R: Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements. Psychophysiology 2000;37:262-266.
2.
Goryczka-Grela R: Analysis of hearing perception in dyslexic children(in Polish). Ann Univ Mariae Curie Skłodowska 2002;XV:1-13.
3.
Manis FR, Mcbride-Chang C, Seidenberg MS, Keating P, Doi LM, Munson B, Petersen A: Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia? J Exp Child Psychol 1997;66:211-235.
4.
Habib M: The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: an overview and working hypothesis. Brain 2000;123:2373-2399.
5.
Blakemore SJ, Frith U: The learning brain: lessons for education: a précis. Dev Sci 2005;8:459-471.
6.
Stein J, Walsh V: To see but not to read: the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends Neurosci 1997;20:147-152.
7.
Nicolson R, Fawcett A, Dean P: Dyslexia development and the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 2001;24:515 - 516.
8.
Vlachos F, Papathanasiou I, Andreou G: Cerebellum and reading. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2007;59:177-183.
9.
de Montfort Supple M: Dyslexia: oral and written language disorder. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000;52:7-13.
10.
Jerger J, Musiek F: Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorder in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:464-474.
11.
Burkard R, Don M, Eggermont J: Auditory Evoked Potentials. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
12.
Naatanen R, Escera C: Mismatch negativity: clinical and other applications. Audiol Neurootol 2000;5:105-110.
13.
Schulte-Körne G, Deimel W, Bartling J, Remschmidt H: The role of phonological awareness, speech perception and auditory temporal processing for dyslexia. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;8(suppl 3):28-34.
14.
Sharma M, Purdy SC, Newall P, Wheldall K, Berman R, Dillon H: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of auditory processing deficits in children with reading disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1130-1144.
15.
Kujala T, Naatanen R: The mismatch negativity in evaluating central auditory dysfunction in dyslexia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001;25:535-543.
16.
Kujala T, Lovio R, Lepisto T, Laasonen M, Näätänen R: Evaluation of multi-attribute auditory discrimination in dyslexia detected with the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:885-893.
17.
Baldeweg T, Richardson A, Watkins S, Foale C, Gruzelier J: Impaired auditory frequency discrimination in dyslexia detected witch mismatch evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 1999;45:495-503.
18.
Bauer P, Burger M, Kummer P, Lohscheller J, Eyshold U, Doellinger M: Correlation between psychometric tests and mismatch negativity in preschool children. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2009;61:206-216.
19.
Corbera S, Escera C, Artigas J: Impaired duration mismatch negativity in developmental dyslexia. Neuroreport 2006;17:1051-1055.
20.
Jirsa RE: The clinical utility of P3 AERP in children with auditory processing disorders. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:903-912.
21.
Taylor MJ, Baldeweg T: Application of EEG, ERP and intracranial recordings to the investigation of cognitive functions in children. Dev Sci 2002;5:318-334.
22.
Purdy SC, Kelly A, Davies M: Auditory brainstem responses, middle latency response, and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;1:367-382.
23.
Hall JW III: New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston, Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, 2007.
24.
Picton TW: The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992;9:456-479.
25.
Picton TW, Alain C, Otten L, Ritter W: Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol 2000;5:111-139.
26.
Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Koch DB: Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science 1996;273:971-973.
27.
Zgorzalewicz M: Auditory and visual evoked potentials in children and adolescents with migraine and tension headache. Poznań, Wydawnictwo UM, 2004.
28.
Kraus N, Cheou M: Speech sound representation in the brain. Audiol Neurootol 2000;5:140-150.
29.
Shtyrov Y, Kujala T, Palva S, Ilmoniemi R, Naatanen R: Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuroimage 2000;12:657-663.
30.
Shtyrov Y, Kulaja T, Palva, S, Ilmoniemi R, Naatanen R: Left hemisphere's dominance in speech processing is not entirely based on acoustic structure of speech sounds. Neuroimage 2000;11:299.
31.
Leppänen P, Richardson U, Pihko E, Eklund KM, Guttorm TK, Aro M, Lyytinen H: Brain responses to changes in speech sound durations differ between infants with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Dev Neuropsychol 2002;22:407-422.
32.
Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA, Pugh K, et al: Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998;95:2636-2641.
33.
Katz J: Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
34.
Shafer VL, Morr ML, Kreuzer JA, Kurtzberg D: Maturation of mismatch negativity in school-age children. Ear Hear 2000;21:242-251.
35.
Korpilahti P, Lang HA: Auditory ERP components and mismatch negativity in dysphasic children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;91:256-264.
36.
Csepe V, Dieckmann B, Hoke M, Ross B: Mismatch negativity to pitch change of acoustic stimuli in preschool and school age children. Proc EPIC 1992;10:32.
37.
Shafer VL, Morr ML, Kreuzer JA, Kurtzberg D: Maturation of mismatch negativity in school-age children. Ear Hear 2000;21:242-251.
38.
Kraus N, McGee T, Sharma A, Carrell T, Nicol T: Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli. Ear Hear 1992;13:158-164.
39.
Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Nicol T, Cunningham J: Speech-sound discrimination in school age children: psychological and neurophysiologic measures. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999;42:1042-1060.
40.
Johnstone S, Barry RJ, Anderson JW, Coyle SF: Age-related changes in child and adolescent event-related potential component morphology, amplitude and latency to standard and target stimuli in an auditory oddball task. Int J Psychophysiol 1996;24:223-238.
41.
Zgorzalewicz M: Endogenous and exogenous evoked potentials in the most common neurologic syndromes during development (in Polish). Przegl Lek 2001;58(suppl 1):16-21.
42.
Kolker IA: Using the P300 potential for the analysis of cognitive functions in children. Neurophysiology 2002;34:1573-9007.
43.
Müller-Kortkamp C: CERA findings in children. 37th Meet NES - GNA - SNE, Bad Kissingen, April 2010.
44.
Schulte-Körne G, Deimel W, Bartling J, Remschmidt H: Auditory processing and dyslexia: evidence for a speech processing deficit. Neuroreport 1998;9:337-340.
45.
Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Koch DB: Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning disorders. Science 1996;273:971-973.
46.
Taylor MJ, Keenan NK: ERPs to orthographic, phonological and semantic classification tasks in normal and dyslexic children. Dev Neuropsychol 1999;15:307-326.
47.
Snowling MJ: Individual differences in development reading skills among children; in Dyslexia: From Brain Tests to Clinical Practise (Dysleksja: od badań mózgu do praktyki). Warszawa, Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. M. Nenckiego PAN, 2004, pp 77-97.
48.
Ramus F: Neurobiology of dyslexia: a reinterpretation of the data. Trends Neurosci 2004;27:720-726.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.