The aim of this article is to explicate the uniqueness of the motor activity implied in spoken language production and to emphasize how important it is, from a theoretical and a clinical perspective, to consider the motor events associated with speaking as domain-specific, i.e., as pertaining to the domain of linguistic expression. First, phylogenetic data are reviewed demonstrating the specificity of the human vocal tract motor network regarding (i) the entrenchment of laryngeal motor skills within the organization of vocal tract movements, (ii) the evolution of a neural basis for skill acquisition within this system, and (iii) the integration of this system into an auditory-motor network. Second, ontogenetic evidence and existing knowledge about the experience-dependent plasticity of the brain are reported to explicate that during speech acquisition the vocal tract motor system is constrained by universal properties of speech production and by the specific phonological properties of the speaker's ambient language. Third, clinical data from dysarthria and apraxia of speech provide the background for a discussion about the theoretical underpinnings of domain-general versus domain-specific views of speech motor control. The article ends with a brief sketch of a holistic neurophonetic approach in experimental inquiries, assessment, and treatment of neuromotor speech impairment.

Keywords:
Articulation, Diagnosis, Dysarthria, Motor speech, Speech motor coordination, Speech therapy
1.
Goldstein L, Byrd D, Saltzman E: The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. In: Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System, edited by Arbib MA. Cambridge: University Press, 2006.
2.
Ziegler W: Apraxic failure and the hierarchical structure of speech motor plans: A non-linear probabilistic model. In: Assessment of Motor Speech Disorders, edited by Lowit A, Kent RD. Plural Publishing Group, 2011.
3.
Simko J, Cummins F: Sequencing and optimization within an embodied task dynamic model. Cognitive Science 2011;35:527-562.
4.
Bunton K: Speech versus Nonspeech: Different Tasks, Different Neural Organization. Semin Speech Lang 2008;29:267-275.
5.
Weismer G: Philosophy of research in motor speech disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006;20:315-349.
6.
Wilson EM, Green JR, Yunusova Y, Moore CA: Task specificity in early oral motor development. Semin Speech Lang 2008;29:257-266.
7.
Ziegler W: Speech motor control is task-specific. Evidence from dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology 2003;17:3-36.
8.
Ziegler W: Distinctions between speech and nonspeech motor control. A neurophonetic view. In: Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes, and Techniques, edited by Tabain M, Harrington J. New York: Psychology Press, 2006.
9.
Brown S, Laird AR, Pfordresher PQ, Thelen SM, Turkeltaub P, Liotti M: The somatotopy of speech: phonation and articulation in the human motor cortex. Brain Cogn 2009;70:31-41.
10.
Eigentler A, Rhomberg J, Nachbauer W, Ritzer I, Poewe W, Boesch S: The scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia correlates with dysarthria assessment in Friedreich's ataxia. J Neurol 2012;259:420-426.
11.
Ballard KJ, Solomon NP, Robin DA, Moon JB, Folkins JW: Nonspeech assessment of the speech production mechanism. In: Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders, edited by McNeil MR. New York - Stuttgart: Thieme, 2009.
12.
Mackenzie C, Muir M, Allen C: Non-speech oro-motor exercise use in acquired dysarthria management: regimes and rationales. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2010.
13.
Owren MJ, Amoss RT, Rendall D: Two organizing principles of vocal production: Implications for nonhuman and human primates. Am J Primatol 2011;73:530-544.
14.
Ackermann H, Hage SR, Ziegler W: Brain mechanisms of acoustic communication in humans and nonhuman primates: An evolutionary perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (under revision).
15.
Wallman J: Aping Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
16.
Sherwood CC, Hof PR, Holloway RL, Semendeferi K, Gannon PJ, Frahm HD, Zilles K: Evolution of the brainstem orofacial motor system in primates: a comparative study of trigeminal, facial, and hypoglossal nuclei. J Hum Evol 2005;48:45-84.
17.
Jürgens U, Alipour M: A comparative study on the cortico-hypoglossal connections in primates, using biotin dextranamine. Neurosci Lett 2002;328:245-248.
18.
Simonyan K, Horwitz B: Laryngeal motor cortex and control of speech in humans. Neuroscientist 2011;17:197-208.
19.
Bouchard KE, Mesgarani N, Johnson K, Chang EF: Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature 2013;495:327-332.
20.
Ghazanfar AA, Takahashi DY, Mathur N, Fitch WT: Cineradiography of monkey lip-smacking reveals putative precursors of speech dynamics. Curr Biol 2012;22:1176-1182.
21.
Davis BL, MacNeilage PF: The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995;38:1199-1211.
22.
Fitch WT: Speech science: Tuned to the rhythm. Nature 2013;494:434-435.
23.
Smith A: Speech motor development: Integrating muscles, movements, and linguistic units. Journal of Communication Disorders 2006;39:331-349.
24.
Lai CS, Fisher SE, Hurst JA, Vargha-Khadem F, Monaco AP: A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature 2001;413:519-523.
25.
Alcock KJ, Passingham RE, Watkins K, Vargha-Khadem F: Pitch and timing abilities in inherited speech and language impairment. Brain Lang 2000;75:34-46.
26.
Alcock KJ, Passingham RE, Watkins KE, Vargha-Khadem F: Oral dyspraxia in inherited speech and language impairment and acquired dysphasia. Brain and Language 2000;75:17-33.
27.
Lai CS, Gerrelli D, Monaco AP, Fisher SE, Copp AJ: FOXP2 expression during brain development coincides with adult sites of pathology in a severe speech and language disorder. Brain 2003;126:2455-2462.
28.
Enard W: FOXP2 and the role of cortico-basal ganglia circuits in speech and language evolution. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011;21:415-424.
29.
Liegeois FJ, Morgan AT: Neural bases of childhood speech disorders: lateralization and plasticity for speech functions during development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36:439-458.
30.
Watkins KE, Vargha-Khadem F, Ashburner J, Passingham RE, Connelly A, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, Mishkin M, Gadian DG: MRI analysis of an inherited speech and language disorder: structural brain abnormalities. Brain 2002;125:465-478.
31.
Graybiel AM, Saka E: The basal ganglia and the control of action. In: The Cognitive Neurosciences, edited by Gazzaniga MS. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
32.
Ackermann H, Ziegler W: A birdsong perspective on human speech production. In: Birdsong, Speech, and Language. Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain, edited by Bolhuis JJ, Everaert M. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.
33.
Petkov CI, Jarvis ED: Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates. Front Evol Neurosci 4:12. doi: 10.3389/fnevo. 2012.00012.
34.
Petrides M, Pandya DN: Distinct parietal and temporal pathways to the homologues of Broca's area in the monkey. PLoS Biol 2009;7:e1000170.
35.
Guenther FH, Hampson M, Johnson D: A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review 1998;105:611-633.
36.
Perkell JS, Matthies M, Lane H, Guenther FH, Wilhelms-Tricarico R, Wozniak J, Guiod P: Speech motor control - acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory-feedback and internal models. Speech Communication 1997;22:227-250.
37.
Catani M, Mesulam M-M: The arcuate fasciculus and the disconnection theme in language and aphasia: History and current state. Cortex 2008;44:953-961.
38.
Hickok G: Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:135-145.
39.
Rilling JK, Glasser MF, Jbabdi S, Andersson J, Preuss TM: Continuity, divergence, and the evolution of brain language pathways. Front Evol Neurosci 2011;3:11.
40.
Jürgens U, Kirzinger A, Cramon DYV: The effects of deep-reaching lesions in the cortical face area on phonation. A combined case report and experimental monkey study. Cortex 1982;18:125-140.
41.
Guenther FH, Ghosh SS, Tourville JA: Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang 2006;96:280-301.
42.
Cai S, Beal DS, Ghosh SS, Tiede MK, Guenther FH, Perkell JS: Weak responses to auditory feedback perturbation during articulation in persons who stutter: Evidence for abnormal auditory-motor transformation. PLoS ONE 7:e41830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041830.
43.
Reiterer SM, Hu X, Erb M, Rota G, Nardo D, Grodd W, Winkler S, Ackermann H: Individual differences in audio-vocal speech imitation aptitude in late bilinguals: functional neuro-imaging and brain morphology. Front Psychol 2011;2:271.
44.
Green JR, Moore CA, Higashikawa M, Steeve RW: The physiologic development of speech motor control: lip and jaw coordination. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:239-255.
45.
Moore CA, Caulfield TJ, Green JR: Relative kinematics of the rib cage and abdomen during speech and nonspeech behaviors of 15-month-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2001;44:80-94.
46.
Whalen DH, Levitt AG, Wang Q: Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language 1991;18:501-516.
47.
Astruc L, Payne E, Post B, Vanrell M, Prieto P: Tonal targets in early child English, Spanish, and Catalan. Language and Speech 2013;56:in press.
48.
Vihman MM, Kunnari S: The sources of phonological knowledge: a cross-linguistic perspective. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 2006;35:133-164.
49.
Payne E, Post B, Astruc L, Prieto P, Vanrell MM: Measuring child rhythm. Lang Speech 2012;55:203-229.
50.
Mampe B, Friederici AD, Christophe A, Wermke K: Newborns' cry melody is shaped by their native language. Curr Biol 2009;19:1994-1997.
51.
Lee SA, Davis B, MacNeilage P: Universal production patterns and ambient language influences in babbling: a cross-linguistic study of Korean- and English-learning infants. J Child Lang 2010;37:293-318.
52.
De Boysson-Bardies B, Halle P, Sagart L, Durand C: A crosslinguistic investigation of vowel formants in babbling. Journal of Child Language 1989;16:1-17.
53.
Sokol SB, Fey ME: Production of /sh/ in trochaic and nontrochaic weak contexts. Clin Linguist Phon 2006;20:677-689.
54.
Arbisi-Kelm T, Beckman ME: Prosodic structure and consonant development across language. In: Phonetics and Phonology. Interactions and Interrelations, edited by Vigário MC, Frota S, Freitas MJ. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009.
55.
Ballard KJ, Robin DA, Folkins JW: An integrative model of speech motor control: a response to Ziegler. Aphasiology 2003;17:37-48.
56.
Ziegler W, Aichert I, Staiger A: Apraxia of Speech: Concepts and Controversies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2012;55:S1485-S1501.
57.
Monfils MH, Plautz EJ, Kleim JA: In search of the motor engram: motor map plasticity as a mechanism for encoding motor experience. Neuroscientist 2005;11:471-483.
58.
Gaser C, Schlaug G: Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J Neurosci 2003;23:9240-9245.
59.
Bengtsson SL, Nagy Z, Skare S, Forsman L, Forssberg H, Ullen F: Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:1148-1150.
60.
Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Taub E: Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 1995;270:305-307.
61.
Imfeld A, Oechslin MS, Meyer M, Loenneker T, Jancke L: White matter plasticity in the corticospinal tract of musicians: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroimage 2009;46:600-607.
62.
Doyon J, Benali H: Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005;15:161-167.
63.
Svensson P, Romaniello A, Wang K, Arendt-Nielsen L, Sessle BJ: One hour of tongue-task training is associated with plasticity in corticomotor control of the human tongue musculature. Exp Brain Res 2006;173:165-173.
64.
Chang SE, Kenney MK, Loucks TM, Poletto CJ, Ludlow CL: Common neural substrates support speech and non-speech vocal tract gestures. Neuroimage 2009;47:314-325.
65.
Riecker A, Ackermann H, Wildgruber D, Dogil G, Grodd W: Opposite hemispheric lateralization effects during speaking and singing at motor cortex, insula and cerebellum. NeuroReport 2000;11:1997-2000.
66.
Wildgruber D, Ackermann H, Klose U, Kardatzki B, Grodd W: Functional lateralization of speech production at primary motor cortex: a fMRI study. NeuroReport 1996;7:2791-2795.
67.
Simonyan K, Ostuni J, Ludlow CL, Horwitz B: Functional but not structural networks of the human laryngeal motor cortex show left hemispheric lateralization during syllable but not breathing production. J Neurosci 2009;29:14912-14923.
68.
Salmelin R, Sams M: Motor cortex involvement during verbal versus non-verbal lip and tongue movements. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;16:81-91.
69.
Sowman PF, Flavel SC, McShane CL, Sakuma S, Miles TS, Nordstrom MA: Asymmetric activation of motor cortex controlling human anterior digastric muscles during speech and target-directed jaw movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009;102:159-166.
70.
Moser D, Fridriksson J, Bonilha L, Healy EW, Baylis G, Baker JM, Rorden C: Neural recruitment for the production of native and novel speech sounds. Neuroimage 2009;46:549-557.
71.
Ballard KJ, Robin DA: Assessment of AOS for treatment planning. Seminars in Speech and Language 2002;23:281-292.
72.
Folkins JW, Moon JB, Luschei ES, Robin DA, Tye-Murray N, Moll KL: What can nonspeech tasks tell us about speech motor disabilities? Journal of Phonetics 1995;23:139-147.
73.
Ziegler W, Vogel M: Dysarthrie. Verstehen - untersuchen - behandeln. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2010.
74.
Maas E, Robin DA, Wright DL, Ballard KJ: Motor programming in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language 2008;106:107-118.
75.
Petrides M, Cadoret G, Mackey S: Orofacial somatomotor responses in the macaque monkey homologue of Broca's area. Nature 2005;435:1235-1238.
76.
Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V: Cortical mechanisms subserving object grasping, action understanding, and imitation. In: The Cognitive Neurosciences, edited by Gazzaniga MS. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
77.
Wallez C, Schaeffer J, Meguerditchian A, Vauclair J, Schapiro SJ, Hopkins WD: Contrast of hemispheric lateralization for oro-facial movements between learned attention-getting sounds and species-typical vocalizations in chimpanzees: extension in a second colony. Brain and Language 2012;123:75-79.
78.
Fazio P, Cantagallo A, Craighero L, D'Ausilio A, Roy AC, Pozzo T, Calzolari F, Granieri E: Encoding of human action in Broca's area. Brain 2009;132:1980-1988.
79.
Koechlin E, Jubault T: Broca's area and the hierarchical organization of human behavior. Neuron 2006;50:963-974.
80.
Higuchi S, Chaminade T, Imamizu H, Kawato M: Shared neural correlates for language and tool use in Broca's area. NeuroReport 2009;20:1376-1381.
81.
Clerget E, Badets A, Duqué J, Olivier E: Role of Broca's area in motor sequence programming: a cTBS study. NeuroReport 2011;22:965-969.
82.
Ballard KJ, Granier JP, Robin DA: Understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology 2000;14:969-995.
83.
Robin DA, Jacks A, Hageman C, Clark HM, Woodworth G: Visuomotor tracking abilities of speakers with apraxia of speech or conduction aphasia. Brain and Language 2008;106:98-106.
84.
Aichert I, Ziegler W: Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language 2004;88:148-159.
85.
Staiger A, Ziegler W: Syllable frequency and syllable structure in the spontaneous speech production of patients with apraxia of speech. Aphasiology 2008;22:1201-1215.
86.
Schoor A, Aichert I, Ziegler W: A motor learning perspective on phonetic syllable kinships: How training effects transfer from learned to new syllables in severe apraxia of speech. Aphasiology in press: 2012.
87.
Aichert I, Büchner M, Ziegler W: Why is ['ju:do] easier than [ju've:l]? Perceptual and acoustic analyses of word stress in patients with apraxia of speech. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie 2011;17:15.
88.
Hixon TJ, Weismer G, Hoit JD: Preclinical Speech Science: Anatomy, Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception: Preparation for Clinical Study and Praxis. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, 2008.
89.
Ziegler W: Modelling the architecture of phonetic plans: Evidence from apraxia of speech. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009;24:631-661.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.