Aims: To assess whether individual parameters or combinations of voice range profile parameters (also called ‘features’) are able to yield a clear cluster separation with which three basic female voice categories can be discriminated and can provide a basis for settling the issue of voice classification. Methods: The voice range profiles of 206 female conservatory singing students were recorded, parameterized into more compact descriptions (‘features’), and subjected to a cluster analysis. Results: The three-cluster case provided the most consistent solution across all feature combinations. The feature that led to the best cluster separation was the ratio of the perimeter length of the chest voice part of the voice range profile versus the total perimeter length. Conclusions: Based on a statistical analysis of voice range profile parameters, the ratio of the perimeter length of the chest voice versus the total perimeter length was shown to yield a clear separation into three basic female voice types, which in turn may give us a basis for settling the issue of voice classification.

1.
Bunch M: Dynamics of the singing voice; in Arnold GE, Winckel F, Wyke BD (eds): Disorders of Human Communication 6. Vienna, Springer, 1982.
2.
Coleman RF: Performance demands and the performer’s vocal capabilities. J Voice 1987;1:209–216.
3.
Garde E: La voix. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1954.
4.
Lycke H: Stemclassificatie en Fonetogram. Dynamiek tussen Morfologie en Functie; in de Jong F (ed): VOX 2007: Spreken en Zingen. Twee Werelden Apart? Nijmegen, Drukkerij Graficolor, 2007.
5.
Stalmans R, De Bodt M: Classificatie van Stemmen. Logopedie 2003;31–36.
6.
Tarneaud J: Traité Pratique de Phonologie et de Phoniatrie, ed 2. Paris, Librairie Maloine, 1961.
7.
Thurmer S: The tessiturogram. J Voice 1988;4:327–329.
8.
Coleman RF: Performance demands and the performer’s vocal capabilities. J Voice 1987;1:209–216.
9.
Burns P: Clinical management of Country and Western singers. J Voice 1991;5:349–353.
10.
McKinney J: The singing/acting young adult from a singing instruction perspective. J Voice 1997;11:153–155.
11.
Sundberg J: Vocal tract resonance; in Sataloff RT (Ed): Professional Voice. The Science and Art of Clinical Care. New York, Raven Press, 1991, pp 49–68.
12.
Abitbol J: L’Odyssée de la Voix. Paris, Laffont, 2005.
13.
Barthélémy Y: La Voix Libérée: Une Nouvelle Technique pour l’Art Lyrique et la Rééducation Vocale. Paris, Laffont, 1984.
14.
Schutte HK: Over het Fonetogram. Log Fon 1975;47:82–92.
15.
Klingholz F, Martin F: Die quantitative Auswertung der Stimmfeldmessung. Sprache Stimme Gehör 1983;7:106–110.
16.
Schutte HK, Seidner W: Recommendation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography. Folia Phoniatr 1983;35:286–288.
17.
Klingholz F, Martin F, Jolk A: Die Bestimmung der Registerbrüche aus dem Stimmfeld. Sprache Stimme Gehör 1985;9:109–111.
18.
Klingholz F, Martin F, Jolk A: Das dreidimensionale Stimmfeld. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) 1986;65:588–591.
19.
Klingholz F, Jolk A, Martin F: Stimmfelduntersuchungen bei Knabenstimmen (Tölzer Knabenchor). Sprache Stimme Gehör 1989;13:107–111.
20.
Pabon JPH: Kwaliteitsaspecten in het Fonetogram. Logopedie 1997;10:20–33.
21.
Pabon JPH, Plomp R: Automatic phonetogram recording supplemented with acoustical voice-quality parameters. J Speech Hear Res 1988;31:710–722.
22.
Pabon JPH: Objective acoustic voice-quality parameters in the computer phonetogram. J Voice 1991;3:203–216.
23.
Airainer R, Klingholz F: Quantitative evaluation of phonetograms in the case of functional dysphonia. J Voice 1993;7:136–141.
24.
Giovanni A, Robert D, Establier N, Teston B, Zanaret M, Cannoni M: Objective evaluation of dysphonia: preliminary results of a device allowing simultaneous acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1996;48:175–185.
25.
Liu TA, Channell RW: Reliability of pitch discrimination of vowel and piano tones. J Voice 1995;9:394–402.
26.
Wapnick J, Ekholm E: Expert consensus in solo voice performance evaluation. J Voice 1997;11:429–436.
27.
De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C: Test-retest study of the GRBAS Scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice 1997;11:74–80.
28.
Oates J, Russell A: Learning voice analysis using an interactive multi-media package: development and preliminary evaluation. J Voice 1998;12:500–512.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.