Objective/Hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to assess the satisfaction and quality of life in laryngectomees after vocal rehabilitation using voice prostheses. We evaluated the impact on quality of life between laryngectomees with voice prostheses, laryngectomees without them and healthy controls. Methods: This was a prospective study on a sample of laryngectomees in an Italian university hospital. Our study population was composed of 42 patients who had previously undergone a total laryngectomy; in 24 of them, voice rehabilitation was obtained with a voice prosthesis device (group A), while 18 of them learned oesophageal voice (group B). The results were compared with a group of 25 healthy controls (group C). In order to investigate the quality of life, we administered the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) to the 3 groups. Moreover, self-satisfaction of the subjects in group A was assessed by single questions regarding their use of the voice prosthesis. Results: A statistical difference in the SF-36 was detected for social functioning (SF) between groups A and B. Role physical, SF and role emotional were significantly better in group C than in group A. Group A stated they were very satisfied with voice quality while there were still some problems regarding prosthesis lifetime and communication at the telephone or in noisy environments. Conclusions: Voice prosthesis implantation in laryngectomees showed positive effects on patients’ quality of life; however, there are still some negative aspects. At present, an early diagnosis of larynx cancer with a partial laryngectomy in order to preserve phonatory function is the gold standard.

Keywords:
Total laryngectomy, Voice prosthesis, Phonatory valve
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.