Background/Aims: The aim of the present study is to construct a simple method for visualizing and quantifying the audibility of speech on the audiogram and to predict speech intelligibility. The proposed method involves a series of indices on the audiogram form reflecting the sound pressure level distribution of running speech. The indices that coincide with a patient’s pure tone thresholds reflect speech audibility and give evidence of residual functional hearing capacity. Patients and Methods: Two validation studies were conducted among sensorineurally hearing-impaired participants (n = 56 and n = 37, respectively) to investigate the relation with speech recognition ability and hearing disability. Results: The potential of the new audibility indices as predictors for speech reception thresholds is comparable to the predictive potential of the ANSI 1968 articulation index and the ANSI 1997 speech intelligibility index. The sum of indices or a weighted combination can explain considerable proportions of variance in speech reception results for sentences in quiet free field conditions. The proportions of variance that can be explained in questionnaire results on hearing disability are less, presumably because the threshold indices almost exclusively reflect message audibility and much less the psychosocial consequences of hearing deficits. Conclusion: The outcomes underpin the validity of the new audibility indexing system, even though the proposed method may be better suited for predicting relative performance across a set of conditions than for predicting absolute speech recognition performance.

Keywords:
Speech area, Running speech, Sound level measurement, Speech reception threshold, Hearing disability
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.