In the rehabilitation of cleft palate patients the quality of spoken language represents one of the most important aspects of successful social integration. It is therefore necessary to direct special attention to phoniatric care and speech therapy following operative reconstruction. One of the main problems is the comparison of subjective and objective measures of the degree and type of nasal disorder. In an interdisciplinary project at the University of Jena nasometry was assessed. Due to a lack of norm values for German a representative sample for the calibration of cleft palate patients and normal subjects was collected. Speech was elicited using standardized and phonetically validated reading materials. Nasalance measurements were compared with judgements made by a group of trained listeners who were asked to assess voice quality (RBH) and nasality. A database containing nasalance values and acoustic signals from 120 subjects was built up. The results generally exhibited highly significant correlations between instrumental measurements and auditory judgements. Profiles of norm values for a phonetically and statistically reliable standard for German were obtained, which in turn can be used as a comparative basis for further studies.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.