Background: Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement postulates non-local triadic interaction between patient (Px), practitioner (Pr) and potentised medicine (Rx), resulting in the patient's journey to cure; the in-depth homeopathic interview is considered a major contributing factor in this process. Also, by modelling entelechy, a quantised gyroscopic analogue of the Vital Force (Vf) has been developed. Objective: To discover whether entanglement notions explain the mode of action of homeopathy during the treatment of epidemic diseases, when the individualising in-depth homeopathic interview is neither possible nor necessary. Method: The current Vf wave equation applies specifically to the in-depth patient/practitioner consultation in chronic dis-ease. A generalised form of the Vf wave equation, an earlier hypothesis based on quantum field theory (QFT) and PPR entanglement were all re-investigated. Results: The generalised Vf wave equation was found applicable in 3 main conditions: acute self-limiting, chronic and epidemic dis-ease. In the latter, a single, coherent Vf epidemic ‘wave function' covering all susceptible beings could be identified, which, after practitioner intervention, disappears. Analogies were drawn between groups of atoms in a p-doped semiconductor and a collection of susceptible beings in an epidemic. Here, genus epidemicus is likened to an ‘n-type dopant', which forms a ‘p-n junction' with the dis-ease. Using the QFT hypothesis/metaphor, genus epidemicus acts as a ‘gauge field' restoring ‘global invariance' to the symmetry-broken, symptom-expressing Vf, i.e., restoring health. Conclusion: Entanglement hypotheses/metaphors may have application in the homeopathic therapeutic process beyond the one-to-one in-depth interview, and so are relevant to describing the mode of action of homeopathy during treatment of epidemic disease.

1.
Walach H: Homeopathy as semiotic. Semiotica 1991;83:81-85.
2.
Walach H: Magic of signs. Br Hom J 2000;89:127-140.
[PubMed]
3.
Gernert D: Towards a closed description of observation processes. BioSystems 2000;54:165-180.
[PubMed]
4.
Gernert D: Conditions for entanglement. Front Perspect 2005;14:8-13.
5.
Milgrom LR: Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement: Part 1. A qualitative non-local metaphor for homeopathy based on quantum theory. Homeopathy 2002;91:239-248.
[PubMed]
6.
Walach H: Generalised entanglement: a new theoretical model for understanding the effects of complementary and alternative medicine. J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:549-559.
[PubMed]
7.
Atmanspacher H, Römer H, Walach H: Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Found Phys 2002;32:379-406.
8.
Nadeau R, Kafatos M: The Non-Local Universe: The New Physics and Matters of the Mind. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 1999.
9.
Weingärtner O: An approach to the scientific identification of a therapeutically active ingredient of high potencies. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 2002;9:229-233.
[PubMed]
10.
Weingärtner O: The nature of the active ingredient in ultra-molecular dilutions. Homeopathy 2007;96:220-226.
[PubMed]
11.
Walach H: Entanglement model of homeopathy as an example of generalised entanglement predicted by weak quantum theory. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 2003;10:192-200.
[PubMed]
12.
Hyland ME: Does a form of ‘entanglement' between people explain healing? An examination of hypotheses and methodology. Complement Ther Med 2004;12:198-208.
[PubMed]
13.
Milgrom LR: Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement: Part 3. Refining the quantum metaphor for homeopathy. Homeopathy 2003;92:152-160.
[PubMed]
14.
Milgrom LR: Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement: Part 4. Towards classification and unification of the different entanglement models for homeopathy. Homeopathy 2004;93:34-42.
[PubMed]
15.
Milgrom LR: Journeys in the country of the blind: entanglement theory and the effects of blinding on trials of homeopathy and homeopathic provings. eCAM 2007;4:7.
[PubMed]
16.
Milgrom LR: A new geometrical description of entanglement and the curative homeopathic process. J Altern Comp Med 2008;14:329-339.
[PubMed]
17.
Milgrom LR: Toward a topological description of the therapeutic process. J Altern Comp Med 2010;16:1-13.
[PubMed]
18.
Milgrom LR: Toward a topological description of the therapeutic process. Part 2: Practitioner and patient perspectives of the ‘journey to cure'. J Altern Comp Med 2012;18:187-199.
[PubMed]
19.
Milgrom LR: Toward a topological description of the therapeutic process. Part 3: Two new metaphors based on quantum superposition, wave function ‘collapse', and conic sections. J Altern Comp Med 2014;20:452-460.
[PubMed]
20.
Greenberger DM, Horne MA, Shimony A, Zeilinger A: Bell's theorem without inequalities. Am J Phys 1990;58:1131-1143.
21.
Walach H, von Stillfried N: Generalised quantum theory - basic idea and general intuition: a background story and overview. Axiomathes 2011;21:185-209.
22.
Zeilinger A: Quantum teleportation and the nature of reality. www.btgjapan.org/catalysts/anton.html, 2004 (last accessed March 21, 2008).
23.
d'Espagnet B: On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2006.
24.
Milgrom LR: Treating Leick with like: response to criticisms of the use of entanglement to illustrate homeopathy. Homeopathy 2008;97:96-99.
[PubMed]
25.
Scully MO, Zubairy MS, Agarwal GS, Walther H: Extracting work from a single heat bath via vanishing quantum coherence. Science 2003;299:862-864.
[PubMed]
26.
Wooters WK: Quantum entanglement as a quantifiable resource. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 1998;89:127-140.
27.
Auyung SY: How Is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.
28.
Ullman D: Discovering Homeopathy: Medicine for the 21st Century, revised ed. Berkeley, North Atlantic Books, 1991.
29.
Hahnemann S: Cure and Prevention of Scarlet Fever. Pamphlet, Gotha, 1801; also in Dudgeon RE (ed): The Lesser Writings of Samuel Hahnemann. Kessinger Legacy Reprints. Whitefish, Kessinger Publishing, 2010.
30.
Hahnemann S: Observations of the scarlet fever. Samuel Hahnemann Sllg Anzeig der Deutschen 1808;160.
31.
Homeopathic Thesaurus: Key Terms to Be Used in Homeopathy, ed 3 (multilingual). www.homeopathyeurope.org/publications/thesaurus/homeothesaurusmulti.pdf, 2007 (last accessed July 28, 2015).
32.
Watson I: A Guide to the Methodologies of Homeopathy, revised ed. Kendal, Cutting Edge Publications, 1999, p 23.
33.
Kent JT: Lectures on Homeopathic Philosophy, Lecture III, What the Physician Must Perceive, ed 5. Sittingbourne, Homeopathic Book Service, 1990, pp 37-39.
34.
From the Mediaeval morality play ‘The Summoning of Everyman': he/she was imagined as devoid of individuality so as to create a moral message applicable to everyone. ‘Everyman' - definition from Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/free (last accessed August 2, 2015).
35.
Milgrom LR: ‘Torque-like' action of remedies and diseases on the Vital Force and their consequences for homeopathic treatment. J Altern Comp Med 2006;12:915-929.
[PubMed]
36.
Milgrom LR: Towards a new model of the homeopathic process based on quantum field theory. Forsch Komplementärmed 2006;12:174-183.
[PubMed]
37.
Milgrom LR: Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 7: A gyroscopic metaphor for the Vital Force and its use to illustrate some of the empirical laws of homeopathy. Forsch Komplementärmed 2004;11:212-223.
[PubMed]
38.
Hahnemann S: The Organon of Medicine, edition 6B (Based on the translation of Hahnemann's own written revision for the sixth edition by Dudgeon and W. Boericke, and the new redaction of the German edition by Kurt Hochstetter). Hochstetter K (ed), Editorial Universitaria, San Francisco, Chile, 1977.
39.
www.britannica.com/topic/entelechy.
40.
Kent JT: Lectures on Homeopathic Philosophy, Lecture XXIV: Idiosyncrasies. Sittingbourne, Homeopathic Book Service, 1990.
41.
Atkins PW, Friedman RS: Molecular Quantum Mechanics, ed 3. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.
42.
Milgrom LR: Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 8: Laser-like action of the homeopathic therapeutic encounter as predicted by a gyroscopic metaphor for the Vital Force. Forsch Komplementärmed 2005;12:206-213.
[PubMed]
43.
Feynman R, Leighton R, Sands M: The Feynman Lectures on Physics: The New Millennium Edition vol I. Ch 22 - Algebra. (© 1963, 2006, 2013 California Institute of Technology), Basic Books, Philadelphia, USA. See also www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_22.html (last accessed September 13, 2016).
44.
Feynman R, Leighton R, Sands M: The Feynman Lectures on Physics: The New Millennium Edition vol I. Ch 33 - Polarisation. (© 1963, 2006, 2013 California Institute of Technology), Basic Books, Philadelphia, USA. See also www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_33.html (last accessed September 13, 2016).
45.
Sherr J: The Dynamics and Methodology of Homeopathic Provings. West Malvern, Dynamis Books, 1994.
46.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/elpro.html (last accessed November 27, 2015).
47.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/pnjun.html#c2 and http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/pnjun.html (last accessed November 27, 2015).
48.
Auyung S: How is quantum field theory possible? New York, Oxford University Press, 1995.
49.
Feynman RP: QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. London, Penguin Books, 1990.
50.
Gribbin J: Q is for Quantum. London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1998.
51.
Hankey A: Self-consistent theories of health and healing. J Altern Comp Med 2008;14:221-223.
[PubMed]
52.
Gaertner K: Into the width and depth of homeopathy in India - report on a journey. http://hpathy.com/ homeopathy-papers/into-the-width-and-depth-of- homeopathy-in-india-report-on-a-journey/, 2013 (last accessed November 30, 2015).
53.
Chalmers DJ: Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud 1995;2:200-219.
54.
Irwin M, Vedhara K: Human Psychoneuroimmunology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
55.
Hameroff S, Penrose R: Consciousness in the universe: a review of the ‘Orch OR' theory. Phys Life Rev 2014;11:39-78.
[PubMed]
56.
Hankey A: Complexity biology-based information structures can explain subjectivity, objective reduction of wave packets, and non-computability. Cosmos and History 2014;10:237-250.
57.
Rodriguez X, Arroyo-Santos A: The function of scientific metaphors: an example of the creative power of metaphors in biological theories. www.academia.edu/903704/The_Function_of_Scientific_Metaphors_An_Example_of_the_Creative_Power_of_Metaphors_in_Biological_Theories, January 2011.
58.
Erikson M, Lindstrom B: Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:376-381.
[PubMed]
59.
Hankey A: A complexity basis for phenomenology: how information states at criticality offer a new approach to understanding experience of self, being and time. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2015;119:288-302.
[PubMed]
You do not currently have access to this content.