Background: We are performing a nationwide survey in a random sample of German general practitioners (GPs), orthopedists, and internists on the use of placebos and nonspecific as well as complementary treatments and their association with basic professional attitudes. In this article we explain the theoretical considerations behind the study approach and the development of the questionnaire. Methods: Based on a systematic review of published surveys, own surveys on the topic, and on theoretical considerations we developed a preliminary version of a 4-page questionnaire that was tested for feasibility in a convenience sample of 80 participants of a general medical education event. We also performed cognitive interviews with 8 physicians to investigate whether the questions were understood adequately. Results: The questions on typical placebos and complementary treatments were well understood and easy to answer for participants. Discussions about the phrasing of questions on nonspecific treatments during interview reflected the vagueness of this concept; but this did not seem to create major problems when answering the related questions. The original questions regarding basic professional attitudes partly were not understood in the manner intended. The relevant questions were modified but the interviews suggest that these issues are difficult to grasp in a quantitative survey. Conclusion: Our testing procedures suggest that our questionnaire is well-suited to investigate our questions with some limitations regarding the issue of basic professional attitudes.

Journal Section:
Original Article <i>· </i> Originalarbeit
Keywords:
Placebos, Placebo effect, Complementary therapies, Cross-sectional study, Germany
1.
Fässler M, Meissner K, Schneider A, Linde K: Frequency and circumstances of placebo use in clinical practice - a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Med 2010;8:15.
[PubMed]
2.
Louhiala P: What do we really know about the deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice? J Med Ethics 2012;38:403-405.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100420
3.
Bundesärztekammer (ed): Stellungnahme ‘Placebo in der Medizin'. Köln, Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, 2011.
4.
Lange HU: Zur Praxis der Placebobehandlung in einer psychiatrischen Klinik. Psychiat Prax 1981;8:147-151.
[PubMed]
5.
Bernateck M, Karst M, Eberhard S, Vivell W, Fischer MJ, Stichtenoth DO: Placebotherapie: Analyse von Umfang und Erwartung in einer Klinik der Maximalversorgung. Schmerz 2009;23:47-53.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-008-0733-x
6.
Meissner K, Höfner L, Fässler M, Linde K: Widespread use of pure and impure placebo interventions by GPs in Germany. Fam Pract 2012;29:79-85.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmr045
7.
Comaroff J: A bitter pill to swallow: placebo therapy in general practice. Sociol Rev 1976;24:79-96.
[PubMed]
8.
Henriksen K, Hansen EH: The threatened self: general practitioners' self-perception in relation to prescribing medicine. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:47-55.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.004
9.
Weiss MC, Scott D: Whose rationality? A qualitative analysis of general practitioners' prescribing. Pharm J 1997;259:339-341.
[PubMed]
10.
Butler CC, Rollnick S, Pill R, Maggs-Rapport F, Stott N: Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats. BMJ 1998;317:637-642.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7159.637
11.
Kumar S, Little P, Britten N: Why do general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for sore throat? Grounded theory interview study. BMJ 2003;326:138.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7381.138
12.
Hrobjartsson A, Norup M: The use of placebo interventions in medical practice - a national questionnaire survey of Danish clinicians. Eval Health Prof 2003;26:153-165.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278703026002002
13.
Fässler M, Gnadinger M, Rosemann T, Biller-Andorno N: Use of placebo interventions among Swiss primary care providers. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:144.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-144
14.
Kermen R, Hickner J, Brody H, Hasham I: Family physicians believe the placebo effect is therapeutic but often use real drugs as placebos. Fam Med 2010;42:636-642.
[PubMed]
15.
O'Riordan M, Dahinden A, Aktürk Z, Ortiz JM, Dağdeviren N, Elwyn G, Micallef A, Murtonen M, Samuelson M, Struk P, Tayar D, Thesen J: Dealing with uncertainty in general practice: an essential skill for the general practitioner. Qual Prim Care 2011;19:175-181.
[PubMed]
16.
Morris CJ, Cantrill JA, Weiss MC: GPs attitudes to minor ailments. Fam Pract 2001;18:581-585.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/18.6.581
17.
Tilscher H: Konservative Orthopädie - Manuelle Medizin. Mehr als nur eine mögliche Vernunftehe? Manuelle Medizin 2006;44:171-176.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-006-0429-1
18.
Fent R, Rosemann T, Fassler M, Senn O, Huber CA: The use of pure and impure placebo interventions in primary care - a qualitative approach. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12:11.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-11
19.
Willis G: Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2005.
20.
Linde K, Fässler M, Meissner K: Placebo interventions, placebo effects and clinical practice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011;366:1905-1912.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0383
21.
VanGeest J P, Johnson TP, Welch VL: Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 2007;30:303-321.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278707307899
22.
Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;8:MR000008.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4
© 2013 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2013
You do not currently have access to this content.