Medical practices that reside outside the mainstream medical structures have existed for centuries, often waxing and waning in prominence and use for various reasons. Recently, there has been a resurgence in interest and use of such practices in the USA generally referred to under the label of ‘complementary and alternative medicine' (CAM). In this article we summarize some of the highlight events that punctuated this resurgence over the last 20 years. As in the past, social forces affecting these trends circulate around power, resources, and scope of practice. However, a prominent feature of this dynamic is a discussion about the role of science and ‘evidence-based medicine' in addressing pluralistic healthcare-related practices. In the early years of this period, attempts to formulate the place of CAM practices as they relate to epistemology, nonconventional assumptions about health and healing, and the complexity of understanding ‘whole systems' were discussed and often examined. Less attention is being paid to those core assumptions in more recent times. The focus now seems to be on how CAM practices can be judiciously and effectively ‘integrated' into mainstream medicine. Examples of how this dynamic is evolving are described.

1.
Bivins R: Alternative Medicine? A History. New York, Oxford Univ Press, 2008.
2.
Flexner A: Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York, NY, Carnegie Foundation, 1910.
3.
Willis E: Introduction: taking stock of medical dominance. Health Soc Rev 2006;15:421-431.
4.
Eisenberg DM, Kaptchuk TJ, Laine C, Davidoff F: Complementary and alternative medicine - an Annals series. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:208.
[PubMed]
5.
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL: Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med 1993;328:246-252.
[PubMed]
6.
Sampson WI: Why the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) Should Be Defunded. www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/nccam.html (accessed 30.01.2013).
7.
A Report to the National Institutes of Health on Alternative Medical Systems and Practices in the United States. Chantilly, VA: Workshop in Alternative Medicine; September 14-16, 1992.
8.
Jonas W: Researching alternative medicine. Nat Med 1997;3:824-827.
[PubMed]
9.
Anonymous: Defining and describing complementary and alternative medicine. Panel on Definition and Description, CAM Research Methodology Conference, April 1995. Altern Ther Health Med Mar 1997;3:49-57.
[PubMed]
10.
Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group: Effect of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) in major depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;287:1807-1814.
[PubMed]
11.
Jonas W: St John's Wort and depression. JAMA 2002;288:446.
[PubMed]
12.
Hufford DJ: Evaluating complementary and alternative medicine: the limits of science and of scientists. J Law Med Ethics 2003;31:198-212.
[PubMed]
13.
Sampson WI: The braid of the ‘Alternative Medicine' movement. Sci Rev Altern Med 2013;3:12964264.
14.
Jonas W: Policy, the public, and priorities in alternative medicine research. Annals AAPSS 2002;583:29-43.
15.
Vickers A, Cassileth B, Ernst E, Fisher P, Goldman P, Jonas W, Kang S-K, Lewith G, Schulz K, Silagy C: How should we research unconventional therapies? Int J Tech Assess Health Care 1997;13:11-121.
[PubMed]
16.
Levin J, Glass T, Kushi L, Schuck J, Steele L, Jonas W: Quantitative methods in research on complementary and alternative medicine: a methodological manifesto. Med Care 1997;35:1079-1094.
[PubMed]
17.
Anonymous: The Science and Clinical Applications of Meditation. Paper presented at: Mind and Life XIII: Investigating the Mind 2005 The Science and Clinical Applications of Meditation; November 8-10 2005; DAR Constitution Hall, Washington DC.
18.
Anonymous: NIH Consensus Conference. Acupuncture. JAMA 1998;280:1518-1524.
[PubMed]
19.
Moerman D, Jonas W, Bush P, Edwards R, Herxheimer A, Kleijnen J, Roberts A, Schiltz M, Solfvin J, Geest SVD: Placebo effects and research in alternative and conventional medicine. Chin J Integr Trad West Med 1996;2:141-148.
20.
Hammer MR, Jonas WB: Managing social conflict in complementary and alternative medicine research: the case of antineoplastons. Integr Cancer Ther Mar 2004;3:59-65.
[PubMed]
21.
Jonas W, Ives J, Rollwagen F, Denman D, Hintz K, Hammer M, Crawford C, Henry K: Can specific biological signals be digitized? FASEB 2006;20:23-28.
[PubMed]
22.
Angell M, Kassirer J: Alternative medicine - the risks of untested and unregulated remedies. N Engl J Med 1998;339:839-841.
[PubMed]
23.
Callahan D: The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Accommodating Pluralism. Washington, D.C., Georgetown University Press, 2004.
24.
Jaroff L: Bee pollen bureaucracy. New York Times October 6, 1997.
25.
Brown D: Scientists speak out against federal funds for research on alternative medicine. Washington Post March 17, 2009.
26.
Tsouderos T: Federal center pays good money for suspect medicine. Chicago Tribune December 11, 2011.
27.
Barnes P, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data 2004;27:1-19.
[PubMed]
28.
Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United Satates, 2007. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr012.pdf (accessed 30.01.2013).
[PubMed]
29.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the American Public: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in the United States. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 2005.
[PubMed]
30.
White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy: Final Report 2002. www.whccamp.hhs.gov/pdfs/fr2002_document.pdf (accessed 30.01.2013).
[PubMed]
31.
Eisenberg D, Buring J, Hrbek A, Davis R, Connelly M, Cherkin D, Levy D, Cunningham M, O'Connor B, Post D: A model of integrative care for low-back pain. J Altern Complement Med 2012;18:1-9.
[PubMed]
32.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf (accessed 30.01.2013).
33.
Report on health care fraud from the Special Committee on Health Care Fraud. Austin, TX: Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, 1997.
34.
The Patient Centered Medical Home. Seven Core Features, Evidence and Transformational Change. www.aafp.org/online/etc/medialib/aafp_org/documents/about/pcmh.Par.0001.File.tmp/PCMH.pdf (accessed 30.01.2013).
35.
Hufford D: Methodology; in Cobb MR, Puchalski CM, Rumbold B (eds): Oxford Textbook of Spirituality in Healthcare. New York, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp 309-322.
36.
McCaffrey AM, Eisenberg DM, Legedza AT, Davis RB, Phillips RS: Prayer for health concerns: results of a national survey on prevalence and patterns of use. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:858-862.
[PubMed]
37.
Astin JA: Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA 1998;279:1548-1553.
[PubMed]
38.
Hufford D: Strengths and weaknesses in the field of spirituality and health; in Grassie W (ed): Advanced Methodologies in the Scientific Study of Religion and Spirituality. Philadelphia, Metanexus Institute, 2010, pp 73-116.
39.
Boon H, Verhoef M, O'Hara D, Findlay B, Majid N: Integrative healthcare: arriving at a working definition. Altern Ther Health Med 2004;10:48-56.
[PubMed]
40.
Khorsan R, Coulter I, Crawford C, Hsiao A: Systematic review of integrative health care research: randomized control trials, clinical controlled trials, and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011;pii:636134.
[PubMed]
41.
Jonas W: Building an evidence house: challenges and solutions to research in complementary and alternative medicine. Forsch Komplementmed 2005;12:159-167.
[PubMed]
42.
Jonas W: The evidence house: how to build an inclusive base for complementary medicine. Western J Med 2001;175:79-80.
[PubMed]
43.
Uehleke B, Fønnebø V, Johannessen H, Lewith G, von Ammon K, Falkenberg T, Brinkhaus B, Reiter B: The Roadmap for European CAM Research. An Explanation of the CAMbrella Project and its Key Findings. http://passthrough.fw-notify.net/download/716144/http://www.cambrella.eu/aduploads/cambrellaroadmap.pdf (accessed 30.01.2013).
44.
Eisenberg D: Integrative medicine in 2021: an imagined retrospective. Explore 2012;8:81-84.
[PubMed]
45.
Coulter ID, Khorsan R, Crawford C, Hsiao AF: Integrative health care under review: an emerging field. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010;33:690-710.
[PubMed]
46.
Herman PM, Poindexter BL, Witt CM, Eisenberg DM: Are complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations. BMJ Open 2012;pii:e001046.
[PubMed]
47.
Herman P: Evaluating the Economics of Complementary and Integrative Medicine. Alexandria, Samueli Institute, 2012.
You do not currently have access to this content.