Introduction: Fetal scalp electrode (FSE) is considered the gold standard for the intrapartum monitoring of the fetal heart rate (FHR) being associated with the lowest rate of signal loss and artifacts including the recording of the maternal heart rate. FSE acquires a fetal electrocardiogram and evaluates the time intervals between successive R waves. As such, it allows the recording of the beat-to-beat fluctuation of the FHR. However, due to the precise estimation of the inter-beat interval, FSE may also demonstrate recurrent atrial ectopic beats and register a highly oscillatory FHR pattern mimicking a saltatory or ZigZag appearance. Case Presentation: We herein describe a case of intrapartum supraventricular ectopic beats leading to the recording of a saltatory appearance of the FHR that could be demonstrated using FSE only and precluded a reliable assessment of intrapartum fetal oxygenation. Transabdominal gray-scale and M-mode ultrasound assessment of the fetal heart documented supraventricular ectopic beats recurring in 1 out of 10–12 beats, thus supporting the hypothesis that the abnormal FHR pattern on the CTG trace was secondary to fetal arrhythmia and not to rapidly evolving fetal hypoxia. Conclusion: In supraventricular fetal arrhythmia, the use of FSE for continuous intrapartum FHR monitoring differently from external ultrasound transducer may capture a highly variable CTG pattern which is caused by the registration of the ectopic atrial beats and not by a rapidly evolving hypoxia.

1.
Ayres-de-Campos
D
,
Spong
CY
,
Chandraharan
E
:
FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel
.
FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography
.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
.
2015
;
131
(
1
):
13
24
.
2.
Kiely
DJ
,
Hobson
S
,
Tyndall
K
,
Oppenheimer
L
.
Technical update no. 429: maternal heart rate artefact during intrapartum fetal health surveillance
.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
.
2022
;
44
(
9
):
1016
27.e1
.
3.
Ayres-de-Campos
D
,
Nogueira-Reis
Z
.
Technical characteristics of current cardiotocographic monitors
.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
.
2016
;
30
:
22
32
.
4.
Nunes
I
,
Ayres-de-Campos
D
,
Costa-Santos
C
,
Bernardes
J
.
Differences between external and internal fetal heart rate monitoring during the second stage of labor: a prospective observational study
.
J Perinat Med
.
2014
;
42
(
4
):
493
8
.
5.
Gracia-Perez-Bonfils
A
,
Vigneswaran
K
,
Cuadras
D
,
Chandraharan
E
.
Does the saltatory pattern on cardiotocograph (CTG) trace really exist? The ZigZag pattern as an alternative definition and its correlation with perinatal outcomes
.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
.
2021
;
34
(
21
):
3537
45
.
6.
Bakker
PC
,
Colenbrander
GJ
,
Verstraeten
AA
,
Van Geijn
HP
.
The quality of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring
.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
.
2004
;
116
(
1
):
22
7
.
7.
Tarvonen
MJ
,
Lear
CA
,
Andersson
S
,
Gunn
AJ
,
Teramo
KA
.
Increased variability of fetal heart rate during labour: a review of preclinical and clinical studies
.
BJOG
.
2022
;
129
(
12
):
2070
81
.
8.
Bet
BB
,
Eijsbroek
FC
,
van Leeuwen
E
,
Linskens
IH
,
Knobbe
I
,
Clur
SA
, et al
.
Fetal premature atrial contractions: natural course, risk factors and adverse outcome
.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
.
2024
;
63
(
5
):
650
7
.
You do not currently have access to this content.