Objective: DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) is associated with microdeletions of chromosome 22q11. It is the second most common cause of congenital heart disease and is an important consideration whenever a conotruncal cardiac anomaly is identified. The availability of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is altering the practice of prenatal genetics and maternal-fetal medicine, resulting in a decline in invasive testing. Antenatal ultrasound and other biomarkers have their own limitation. NIPT was proposed to screen DGS with cell-free DNA in Taiwan. Here, we present our experience of prenatal diagnosis of DGS in our center. Methods: This was a retrospective study between November 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020, in Taiwan. Data were collected from 7,826 pregnant women self-referred for DGS screening with massive parallel shotgun sequencing-based NIPT. High-risk cases subsequently received amniocentesis for array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to confirm the diagnosis. Characteristics of pregnancies were documented when participants received the test. Report of NIPT was completed 2 weeks after the test. Follow-up on high-risk cases was completed by telephone interview on January 30, 2021. Results: Thirteen cases showed high risk by NIPT, and 7 cases were confirmed by aCGH. The sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64.57–100.00%) and 99.92% (95% CI 99.83–99.96%). The prevalence of DGS was 1 in 1,118 pregnancies. The positive predictive rate was 53.85% (95% CI 29.14–76.79%). One true positive (TP) showed US anomaly, and 5 TPs selected termination. Discussion/Conclusion: NIPT demonstrated good performance in DGS screening. Detection of 22q11.2 deletion could be combined with routine screening to facilitate proper intervention.

1.
Sullivan
KE
.
Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: DiGeorge syndrome/velocardiofacial Syndrome
.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am
.
2008
;
28
(
2
):
353
66
. .
2.
Botto
LD
,
May
K
,
Fernhoff
PM
,
Correa
A
,
Coleman
K
,
Rasmussen
SA
,
A population-based study of the 22q11.2 deletion: phenotype, incidence, and contribution to major birth defects in the population
.
Pediatrics
.
2003
;
112
(
1 Pt 1
):
101
7
. .
3.
Gross
SJ
,
Stosic
M
,
McDonald-McGinn
DM
,
Bassett
AS
,
Norvez
A
,
Dhamankar
R
,
Clinical experience with single-nucleotide polymorphism-based non-invasive prenatal screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
.
2016
;
47
(
2
):
177
83
. .
4.
Ravi
H
,
McNeill
G
,
Goel
S
,
Meltzer
SD
,
Hunkapiller
N
,
Ryan
A
,
Validation of a SNP-based non-invasive prenatal test to detect the fetal 22q11.2 deletion in maternal plasma samples
.
PLoS One
.
2018
;
13
(
2
):
e0193476
. .
5.
McDonald-McGinn
DM
,
Sullivan
KE
,
Marino
B
,
Philip
N
,
Swillen
A
,
Vorstman
JA
,
22q11.2 deletion syndrome
.
Nat Rev Dis Primers
.
2015
;
1
:
15071
. .
6.
Bassett
AS
,
McDonald-McGinn
DM
,
Devriendt
K
,
Digilio
MC
,
Goldenberg
P
,
Habel
A
,
Practical guidelines for managing patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
.
J Pediatr
.
2011
;
159
(
2
):
332
9.e1
. .
7.
Schmid
M
,
Wang
E
,
Bogard
PE
,
Bevilacqua
E
,
Hacker
C
,
Wang
S
,
Prenatal screening for 22q11.2 deletion using a targeted microarray-based cell-free DNA test
.
Fetal Diagn Ther
.
2018
;
44
(
4
):
299
304
. .
8.
McDonald-McGinn
DM
,
Tonnesen
MK
,
Laufer-Cahana
A
,
Finucane
B
,
Driscoll
DA
,
Emanuel
BS
,
Phenotype of the 22q11.2 deletion in individuals identified through an affected relative: cast a wide FISHing net!
Genet Med
.
2001
;
3
(
1
):
23
9
. .
9.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics
.
Committee opinion No. 545: noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
.
Obstet Gynecol
.
2012 Dec
;
120
(
6
):
1532
4
.
10.
Niederstrasser
SL
,
Hammer
K
,
Möllers
M
,
Falkenberg
MK
,
Schmidt
R
,
Steinhard
J
,
Fetal loss following invasive prenatal testing: a comparison of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis
.
J Perinat Med
.
2017
;
45
(
2
):
193
8
. .
11.
Jordan
VK
,
Zaveri
HP
,
Scott
DA
.
1p36 deletion syndrome: an update
.
Appl Clin Genet
.
2015
;
8
:
189
200
. .
12.
Cerruti Mainardi
P
.
Cri du chat syndrome
.
Orphanet J Rare Dis
.
2006
;
1
:
33
. .
13.
Cassidy
SB
,
Dykens
E
,
Williams
CA
.
Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes: sister imprinted disorders
.
Am J Med Genet
.
2000
;
97
(
2
):
136
46
. .
14.
Cassidy
SB
,
Driscoll
DJ
.
Prader-Willi syndrome
.
Eur J Hum Genet
.
2009
;
17
(
1
):
3
13
. .
15.
Martin
K
,
Iyengar
S
,
Kalyan
A
,
Lan
C
,
Simon
AL
,
Stosic
M
,
Clinical experience with a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based non-invasive prenatal test for five clinically significant microdeletions
.
Clin Genet
.
2018
;
93
(
2
):
293
300
. .
16.
Wapner
RJ
,
Babiarz
JE
,
Levy
B
,
Stosic
M
,
Zimmermann
B
,
Sigurjonsson
S
,
Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
.
2015
;
212
(
3
):
332.e1
9
. .
17.
Srinivasan
A
,
Bianchi
DW
,
Huang
H
,
Sehnert
AJ
,
Rava
RP
.
Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma
.
Am J Hum Genet
.
2013
;
92
(
2
):
167
76
. .
18.
Kyburz
A
,
Bauersfeld
U
,
Schinzel
A
,
Riegel
M
,
Hug
M
,
Tomaske
M
,
The fate of children with microdeletion 22q11.2 syndrome and congenital heart defect: clinical course and cardiac outcome
.
Pediatr Cardiol
.
2008
;
29
(
1
):
76
83
. .
19.
Cheung
EN
,
George
SR
,
Andrade
DM
,
Chow
EW
,
Silversides
CK
,
Bassett
AS
.
Neonatal hypocalcemia, neonatal seizures, and intellectual disability in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
.
Genet Med
.
2014
;
16
(
1
):
40
4
. .
20.
Liang
D
,
Cram
DS
,
Tan
H
,
Linpeng
S
,
Liu
Y
,
Sun
H
,
Clinical utility of noninvasive prenatal screening for expanded chromosome disease syndromes
.
Genet Med
.
2019
;
21
(
9
):
1998
2006
. .
21.
Helgeson
J
,
Wardrop
J
,
Boomer
T
,
Almasri
E
,
Paxton
WB
,
Saldivar
JS
,
Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole-genome noninvasive prenatal testing
.
Prenat Diagn
.
2015
;
35
(
10
):
999
1004
. .
22.
Donnelly
JC
,
Platt
LD
,
Rebarber
A
,
Zachary
J
,
Grobman
WA
,
Wapner
RJ
.
Association of copy number variants with specific ultrasonographically detected fetal anomalies
.
Obstet Gynecol
.
2014
;
124
(
1
):
83
90
. .
23.
Shaw
SW
,
Hsiao
CH
,
Chen
CY
,
Ren
Y
,
Tian
F
,
Tsai
C
,
Noninvasive prenatal testing for whole fetal chromosomal aneuploidies: a multicenter prospective cohort trial in Taiwan
.
Fetal Diagn Ther
.
2014
;
35
(
1
):
13
7
. .
24.
Boon
EM
,
Faas
BH
.
Benefits and limitations of whole genome versus targeted approaches for noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies
.
Prenat Diagn
.
2013
;
33
(
6
):
563
8
. .
25.
Shaikh
TH
,
Kurahashi
H
,
Saitta
SC
,
O’Hare
AM
,
Hu
P
,
Roe
BA
,
Chromosome 22-specific low copy repeats and the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: genomic organization and deletion endpoint analysis
.
Hum Mol Genet
.
2000
;
9
(
4
):
489
501
. .
26.
Buiting
K
.
Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome
.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet
.
2010
;
154c
(
3
):
365
76
. .
27.
Bahamat
AA
,
Assidi
M
,
Lary
SA
,
Almughamsi
MM
,
Peer Zada
AA
,
Chaudhary
A
,
Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for the diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome in Saudi Arabian population
.
Cytogenet Genome Res
.
2018
;
154
(
1
):
20
9
. .
28.
Gregg
AR
,
Skotko
BG
,
Benkendorf
JL
,
Monaghan
KG
,
Bajaj
K
,
Best
RG
,
Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
.
Genet Med
.
2016
;
18
(
10
):
1056
65
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.