Objective: To investigate the proportion and type of fetal anomalies that are associated with polyhydramnios and to examine whether in cases with idiopathic polyhydramnios during the course of pregnancy and fetal anomalies only diagnosed after birth, antenatal characteristics differ. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving all pregnancies with polyhydramnios defined by a deepest pool of amniotic fluid ≥8 cm and a detailed ultrasound examination, a 75 g glucose tolerance test and a TORCH serology. Results: Between 2004 and 2010, 272 pregnancies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In 89 (32.7%) and 65 (23.9%) cases, there was a fetal anomaly or diabetes. In 118 (43.4%) pregnancies, polyhydramnios was classified as idiopathic. In 11 (9.3%) of the 118 fetuses, an anomaly was found after birth, mainly gastrointestinal atresia. In these cases, median deepest pool of amniotic fluid was 9.6 cm, and median estimated fetal weight was at the 69th centile, whereas in cases without anomalies diagnosed after birth, median deepest pool was 9.0 cm and median estimated fetal weight at the 90th centile (Mann-Whitney U test: deepest pool p = 0.116, and estimated fetal weight centile p = 0.377). There was also no difference in the maternal and gestational age distribution of these cases (Mann-Whitney U test: maternal age p = 0.293, and gestational age p = 0.499). Conclusion: In about 40% of pregnancies, polyhydramnios remains unexplained during the course of pregnancy. In 10% of these cases, an anomaly will only be found after birth. In this group, antenatal characteristics such as amniotic fluid volume, estimated fetal weight or gestational and maternal age at the time of diagnosis do not help to detect these anomalies before birth.

Keywords:
Amniotic fluid, Amniotic fluid index, Major anomalies, Idiopathic polyhydramnios
1.
Queenan JT, Thompson W, Whitfield CR, Shah SI: Amniotic fluid volumes in normal pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;114:34–38.
2.
Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, Lutgendorf MA, Magann MI, Morrison JC: A review of idiopathic hydramnios and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007;62:795–802.
3.
Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, Santos-Ramos R, Twickler DM: Hydramnios: anomaly prevalence and sonographic detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:134–139.
4.
Many A, Lazebnik N, Hill LM: The underlying cause of polyhydramnios determines prematurity. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:55–57.
5.
Shoham I, Wiznitzer A, Silberstein T, Fraser D, Holcberg G, Katz M, et al: Gestational diabetes complicated by hydramnios was not associated with increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;100:46–49.
6.
Desmedt EJ, Henry OA, Beischer NA: Polyhydramnios and associated maternal and fetal complications in singleton pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:1115–1122.
7.
Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, Simpson LL: Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011, Epub ahead of print.
8.
Magann EF, Sanderson M, Martin JN, Chauhan S: The amniotic fluid index, single deepest pocket, and two-diameter pocket in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1581–1588.
9.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984;150:535–540.
10.
Fok WY, Chan LY, Lau TK: The influence of fetal position on amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:162–165.
11.
Magann EF, Doherty DA, Chauhan SP, Busch FWJ, Mecacci F, Morrison JC: How well do the amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket indices (below the 3rd and 5th and above the 95th and 97th percentiles) predict oligohydramnios and hydramnios? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:164–169.
12.
Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, Magann MI, Morrison JC: The evidence for abandoning the amniotic fluid index in favor of the single deepest pocket. Am J Perinatol 2007;24:549–555.
13.
Ben-Chetrit A, Hochner-Celnikier D, Ron M, Yagel S: Hydramnios in the third trimester of pregnancy: a change in the distribution of accompanying fetal anomalies as a result of early ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1344–1345.
14.
Ozawa K, Ishikawa H, Maruyama Y, Nagata, T, Nagase H, Itani Y, Kurosawa K, Yamanaka M: Congenital omphalocele and polyhydramnios: a study of 52 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011;30:184–188.
15.
Kleiner B, Callen PW, Filly RA: Sonographic analysis of the fetus with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:359–363.
16.
Barkin SZ, Pretorius DH, Beckett MK, Manchester DK, Nelson TR, Manco-Johnson ML: Severe polyhydramnios: incidence of anomalies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:155–159.
17.
Abdel-Fattah SA, Bhat A, Illanes S, Bartha JL, Carrington D: TORCH test for fetal medicine indications: only CMV is necessary in the United Kingdom. Prenat Diagn 2005;25:1028–1031.
18.
Fayyaz H, Rafi J: TORCH screening in polyhydramnios: an observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011, Epub ahead of print.
19.
Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft: Evidenzbasierte Leitlinie zu Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge. http://www.deutsche-diabetesgesellschaft.de/redaktion/news/EbLL_GDM_ENDFASSUNG_2011_01_28_E1.pdf, accessed on January 15, 2012.
20.
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991–2002.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.