Objective: To examine the effect of method of conception on adverse pregnancy outcome after the 11–13 weeks scan. Methods: Prospective screening study for adverse obstetric outcomes in women with singleton pregnancies and live fetus with no obvious defects at 11+0–13+6 weeks. The method of conception was recorded as spontaneous, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and assisted by ovulation induction (OI) drugs without IVF. Regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the method of conception and pregnancy outcome after adjustment for maternal characteristics. Results: In the study population of 41,577 pregnancies, conception was spontaneous in 40,261 (96.9%), by IVF in 634 (1.5%) and by OI in 682 (1.6%). In the pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology, compared to spontaneous conceptions, there was a higher risk of stillbirth, pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, delivery of small for gestational age neonates and caesarean section. However, multiple regression analysis showed that after taking into account maternal characteristics, the only significant contributions of IVF were for pre-eclampsia and elective caesarean section and the contributions of OI were for miscarriage, spontaneous early preterm delivery and small for gestational age. Conclusions: Conception by IVF and OI is associated with increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcome.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.