Aim: To compare the influence of different modes of vaginal delivery in breech presentation on perinatal outcome. Materials and Methods: During the period 2000–2005, perinatal outcome of newborns was compared in 144 vaginal breech deliveries divided into 5 groups depending on the mode of delivery used (Bracht, Thiessen, Müller, Mauriceau-Levret-Veit-Smellie (MLVS), classical arm release). Neonates transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit were further divided into 2 groups – premature infants and term neonates – in order to follow their perinatal outcome separately. In addition, maternal demographic and antenatal parameters were observed. Results: Of 144 deliveries, the most often used mode was Bracht (78.47%), followed by Thiessen (9.03%), Müller (8.33%), MLVS (3.47%) and classical arm release (0.69%). 77.08% of pregnancies were term and 22.92% premature urgent or precipitate deliveries (22–37 gestational weeks). Apgar score >7 at 5 min was noted in Thiessen (100%), followed by Bracht (90.26%), Müller (75%), MLVS (80%) along with arterial cord blood pH value. 40 neonates were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit. They were delivered by Thiessen (7.69%), Bracht (28.32%), Müller (33.33%), MLVS (40%) and classical arm release (100%). 60% of those transferred were premature infants and 40% term neonates transferred mostly on account of perinatal maladaptation or perinatal hypoxia. Apgar scores and arterial cord blood pH value of newborns transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were better when less aggressive modes of vaginal delivery were used. 92% of neonates delivered by the Thiessen mode required no other medical care; this percentage decreased in other more active modes (p < 0.001) and was 72% versus other active groups (p < 0.01) for the Bracht mode. Conclusion: Less-traumatizing actions during vaginal delivery of breech presentation have less harmful consequences and therefore better perinatal outcome. Incidence of AS <7 and lower arterial cord blood pH value rise with the aggressiveness of the mode of vaginal delivery used.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.